what does it even mean that he's not good enough to start on a contender?
you know, taj gibson isn't a player that could start on a championship team. let's let him go. in fact let's get rid of brewer too.
of course that's an idiotic idea. if you have a 20 ppg scorer that you get for below market value, you'd be a moron not to do it.
as well, what does that even mean? that he can't be the best player on a championship team or that the laws of the universe will not allow him to be in the starting lineup and win a title?
if ben gordon is the best player for the job, you can't start larry freaking hughes in front of him so he can come off the bench.
i'm sorry my posts are so incoherent. it's late.
__________________
B/R Featured Columnist
check it out
Marshon Brooks
2011-12 Stats: 13.7 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.8 apg, 0.7 spg, 0.3 bpg, 21.5 mpg, 46.3% FG, 33.3% 3pt, 83.3% FT
|