Bears meet with HaHa Clinton-Dix

Matt2012

Well-known member
670
676
68
Seems odd. Can he play SS? I can't imagine we're signing him for depth unless he's very cheap. Is he known to be a versatile guy?
 

twetz

New member
61
34
0
No thanks. Packers were happy to dump him and they were hurting at safety. That should tell you everything you need to know. The talk was that he felt he was so good he could freelance and his work ethic was questioned.
 

Visionman

Well-known member
3,350
1,141
70
No thanks. Packers were happy to dump him. That should tell you everything you need to know. The talk was that he felt he was so good he could freelance and his work ethic was questioned.
Questioned by Erin?
 

Aesopian

Hooters Waitress
10,366
4,562
75
No thanks. Packers were happy to dump him. That should tell you everything you need to know. The talk was that he felt he was so good he could freelance and his work ethic was questioned.
He underperformed with the Redskins so his value is low it would be a cheap one year prove it deal.
 

BEARZOMBIE

Well-known member
6,402
2,727
70
Packers might be happy to be rid of him cause they need difference makers on defense that was talentless. When you have ballers like Mack trevethian smith hicks fuller Jackson then you can get by with a haha. We have a budget at about 6 mil a year for safety he probably fits in perfectly with that
 

Aesopian

Hooters Waitress
10,366
4,562
75
Packers might be happy to be rid of him cause they need difference makers on defense that was talentless. When you have ballers like Mack trevethian smith hicks fuller Jackson then you can get by with a haha. We have a budget at about 6 mil a year for safety he probably fits in perfectly with that
Also an upgrade from Amos.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
4,801
2,039
70
If they could get him cheaper and less years than Amos, it’s a win.
 

Bears4Ever_34

Well-known member
6,979
1,940
70
The problem is that neither Dix nor Eddie Jackson can tackle. As a safety, that's kind of a problem. I don't like the pairing all that much.
 

legendxofxlink

True Number 51
5,678
4,118
70
The skins are trying to sign him back. He might take the fuck off under Pagano, behind a relentless front 7 and beside another bama safety. I’ll accept it
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
4,715
2,126
70
Ha Ha is every bit as good as Amos. Would be weird to have him while the Packers have Amos.
Depends on your perspective. Dix can't really tackle at all. Jackson's not a good tackler. Amos was a great tackler. But HCD runs circles around Amos in coverage. Amos is certainly more consistent though, which I think gives him the edge.
 

Raskolnikov

Well-known member
13,593
3,622
75
Seems odd. Can he play SS? I can't imagine we're signing him for depth unless he's very cheap. Is he known to be a versatile guy?
In today’s nfl with our front 7, a great balance would be two FS’s. But yes of the two haha is bigger and more physical.
 

Raskolnikov

Well-known member
13,593
3,622
75
Keep in mind we also have Smith in year two playing deep linebacker and should just pas his stats if the safeties are soft. We got our P.Willis
 

TL1961

Well-known member
17,706
5,981
85
No thanks. Packers were happy to dump him and they were hurting at safety. That should tell you everything you need to know. The talk was that he felt he was so good he could freelance and his work ethic was questioned.
That sounds like a coaching issue.
 
Top