My favorite teams
Wrong again.pot......meet Kettle. My views nets the same results that resulted in what was ruled on the field, not to mention voted on by all 32 NFL owners and passed. Your views represent that of a butt hurt Bears fan looking for a loophole in a rule that would have benefited the Bears.
You are correct here. My ability to comprehend what would make sense to happen after this play would preclude me from the obfuscation required in the NFL Rules Committee.Your ability to comprehend what the end result of that specific play should have been clearly illustrates why you shouldn't be.
I fail to grasp most of your nonsense including what "unanimous" remotely has to do with anything here.What part of "my opinion" is it you fail to grasp? The official on the field that witnessed the play in real time ruled it incomplete. Your "crew" that overturned that call had the benefit of slow motion replay. Regardless, it was not unanimous.
So you do agree it was ruled complete after the review? Ok, and compound that with a fumble after said catch and you have a catch retroactively being a non-catch. Objectively a logical contradiction once you grant it was ruled an eventual catch.Nice try. Your twisting my words. I never said that, I said it should be an incomplete catch, not that under the current rules it was.
What's your point? If he did then the Bears would have had possession and we wouldn't have this convo. That doesn't make the rule as it is logical.Robinson, Miller...who cares, tell him to hold onto the ball next time and we won't have this conversation. Or better yet, have the presence of mind, if he thought he did indeed catch the ball, to go pick up the ball.
That doesn't stop the fact that if it stands this way, there would be every incentive for both offensive and defensive players fighting for the ball after every incompletion just in case a review might come up disregarding the whistle or refs saying "stop fighting we blew the whistle".
Another completely irrelevant observation by you.The fact he didn't seems to suggest even Miller thought it was incomplete.......
Yep Parkey sucks. Good one?Doink....doink......
Yep whoopee doo for the Bears. They definitely should have done better with the talent. Wait ... what is your implication from that? That therefore your Lions don't suck?Oh, and the Bears finished last in 4 out of the last five years, and went one and done in the playoffs this year, whoopee doo.
Everything you said is true and also the Lions simultaneously suck worse. Is what it is. I am curious because when the Bears sucked I was always happy to agree in my frustration with how shit they were. Interesting.