Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 23 to 44 of 124

Thread: Can we talk about that weird catch and fumble incomplete pass?

  1. #23
    President Stoopid Pegger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Communist Canada
    Posts
    4,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by remydat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Really not that completed. The catch and fumble are two separate things. The rule should be whether there was a catch. If there was then it is a catch. If there is no clear recovery then like any other situation, the ball stays with the offense. Pretty simple really.
    Well it's not that easy for this specific situation. If the defenders are all around the ball and the ref is blowing the play dead are the defenders supposed to ignore the whistle? What if they jump on a ball and start a scrum for the recovery? Are they risking an unnecessary roughness or delay of game type penalty by ignoring the whistle and making the play go on beyond when the ref said it was over?

    The refs don't want to determine the outcome of a game, but based on the evolution of the rule book/replay they are being put in spots where they can materially mess things up while trying to make the right call. My guess is the ref close was just judging the reception based on last year's definition, so called it incomplete.

    Personally I think they created the rule on some weird Madden glitch.

    Get your mind out of the gutter...

  2. #24
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by didshereallysaythat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You guys are missing the actual rule here for when no one recovers the ball.

    If they call it a catch on the field and down by contact (and looking at the replay it's really a fumble) then the catch stands and the team that fumbled keeps the ball there.

    A catch that really happened is only called incomplete if it was called incomplete on the field so they stay with the call. So it's not about magically turning it into incomplete. It's about not OVERTURNING the call.
    Who is missing what?

    You are explaining the same way many others have. Nobody is saying they "magically turned it into incomplete". They called it incomplete and can't correct the determination of a CATCH, based on whether anyone recovered a FUMBLE that occurred AFTER the catch.

    It's nonsensical, and Dungy, a member of the rules committee, said as much.

  3. #25
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Milton Waddams View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't get not going after every loose ball. That's one of the things I respected about Lovie's players...they'd always try to pick it up and score. What's the downside to hustling after it, just in case? You don't look cool?

    It was like that free TD they gave GB in the 2013 finale (which sent them to the playoffs and left us home). Their guy only picked it up b/c the ball happened to fall near their sideline, so their sideline was yelling at their guy to pick it up and try to score. It was the BEARS first year after Lovie, with Tucker running the D. How in the F did all those guys who played for Lovie (Briggs, etc...) just stop scooping up the loose football b/c he was gone? He'd only been gone for months at that point. You forgot to not "loaf" on a loose ball? Ugh.
    Briggs stopped doing anything the day Lovie was fired.

  4. #26
    President Stoopid Pegger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Communist Canada
    Posts
    4,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TL1961 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Who is missing what?

    You are explaining the same way many others have. Nobody is saying they "magically turned it into incomplete". They called it incomplete and can't correct the determination of a CATCH, based on whether anyone recovered a FUMBLE that occurred AFTER the catch.

    It's nonsensical, and Dungy, a member of the rules committee, said as much.
    This is the problem we are in where most of the rule book was written before reply captured as many items as it does. I could imagine when a game day ref gets on the phone and he's being quoted 'subsection 12 of addendum G linked to part 2 of paragraph 6...' then he's asked to explain that to a blood hungry home crowd in an extremely important part of the game.

    It's like when they tried to remove the 'grey' area of what a catch is and isn't. People lost their minds, so they changed it back. The problem is we want the grey area on some of those calls, but when you can review it and slow it down in high def from multiple angles the underlying call materially changes.
    Get your mind out of the gutter...

  5. #27
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    12

    Default

    If Parkey makes the kick, this is a moot point.

  6. #28
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    3,019

    Default

    I don't like this rule because it isn't logical. You are penalizing a team because the refs screwed up. Imagine the scenario: a QB threw an "incomplete pass" during contact on 3d down and nobody picks up the ball off the ground at the whistle, it's now 4th in field goal range. The defensive team challenges for the strip sack. It becomes clear that the throwing motion hadn't started when the ball came loose, and should be rules a strip sack.

    Should the refs (a) maintain that the ball was incomplete because nobody recovered the football when the play was blown dead, despite review proving that there was never a pass attempt (b) march the team on offense back to the point of the review-reversed strip and the ball remain with the offense or (c) the ball awarded to the defensive team for forcing a fumble. The answer seems obvious to me, you go with choice B.

    I'm equally annoyed by this as I am about the fumble in the opponent's endzone is a turnover, instead of spotting the ball at the point of the fumble. It is like the rules have exceptions carved out specifically to throw in aggravating wrinkles and give fans something to complain about besides how much money ownership gets on the labor of the players.
    3 - Kaleb McGary, Right Tackle
    4 - Chase Hansen, S/LB
    5 - Alex Barnes, RB
    7 - Sean Krepsz, C/G

  7. #29
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    12

    Default

    From where I was sitting, Seattle was in a much better position to recover the fumble. We actually caught a break.

  8. #30
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gud Brant View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If Parkey makes the kick, this is a moot point.
    Well, it would still be a rule, and can certainly happen again, so it's far from moot.

    But thanks for trolling.

  9. #31
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gud Brant View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    From where I was sitting, Seattle was in a much better position to recover the fumble. We actually caught a break.
    Wow, you had some seriously shitty view.

  10. #32
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    29,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pegger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Well it's not that easy for this specific situation. If the defenders are all around the ball and the ref is blowing the play dead are the defenders supposed to ignore the whistle? What if they jump on a ball and start a scrum for the recovery? Are they risking an unnecessary roughness or delay of game type penalty by ignoring the whistle and making the play go on beyond when the ref said it was over?

    The refs don't want to determine the outcome of a game, but based on the evolution of the rule book/replay they are being put in spots where they can materially mess things up while trying to make the right call. My guess is the ref close was just judging the reception based on last year's definition, so called it incomplete.

    Personally I think they created the rule on some weird Madden glitch.

    After his Int Roquan ran it all the way back the whistle. Players do that all the time. You should always get the ball. No excuses.

    And again if no clear recovery then ball goes back to O. Really not an issue.

  11. #33
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gallagher View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm equally annoyed by this as I am about the fumble in the opponent's endzone is a turnover, instead of spotting the ball at the point of the fumble. It is like the rules have exceptions carved out specifically to throw in aggravating wrinkles and give fans something to complain about besides how much money ownership gets on the labor of the players.
    I would guess that the rule at the endzone is to avoid a team from being able to pitch the ball forward through the endzone and be awarded with a TD. So it seems there was some reason for it. But I agree it is not the best solution.

    They later somewhat addressed this for balls into, not through, the endzone by saying only the player who fumbled can recover it, or else it comes back to the point of the fumble.

    Your suggestion to do the same if it goes out of bounds in the endzone or out the back, makes very good sense. Everywhere else on the field the ball reverts to the offense if OB before recovered.

    They may have at least had a reason for the rule, but it's not the best solution. The one yesterday seems to have never had a good reason, and Dungy seemed to say as much.

  12. #34
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by remydat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    After his Int Roquan ran it all the way back the whistle. Players do that all the time. You should always get the ball. No excuses.

    And again if no clear recovery then ball goes back to O. Really not an issue.
    You're only going to make us feel worse. I'm not sure that Roquan and the intended receiver made contact after Roquan had possession.

  13. #35
    All-Star BEARZOMBIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    5,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AuCN View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yeah, they blew the whistle. Why would anyone go pick up the ball?
    Because coaches train players to regardless of whistle

  14. #36
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    8,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This is why players are coached to pick up that ball regardless of whistles and what not. Had a Bears player picked it up, it’s their ball at that spot.
    Yeah but in this case the ref stepped right in front of Anthony Miller, and was waving his hands signaling an incomplete pass. Why would a reasonable person, given that signal, run up to the ball to pick it up? I understand if there was some doubt or lack of certainty but the ref was like 2 feet away from him whistling and waving the pass off.

  15. #37
    The Truth Spartan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    27,267

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ikkoikki View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yeah but in this case the ref stepped right in front of Anthony Miller, and was waving his hands signaling an incomplete pass. Why would a reasonable person, given that signal, run up to the ball to pick it up? I understand if there was some doubt or lack of certainty but the ref was like 2 feet away from him whistling and waving the pass off.
    Just pick the ball up and hand it to the ref saying heís wrong. No need to try to advance it, the whistle means the play is dead right there. Just need to possess it. Itís a good habit to get your players into anyway, kinda like running hard to first base, in baseball, on a ground ball thatís fielded even though you know youíll be out 99 out of 100 times.

  16. #38
    CCS HoF: Class of 2014 HeHateMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    slums of shaolin
    Posts
    25,624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gud Brant View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    From where I was sitting, Seattle was in a much better position to recover the fumble. We actually caught a break.
    Is your TV a Toshiba?

  17. #39
    CCS Donator Dick Jauron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois.
    Posts
    670

    Default

    Stupid rule that the NFL will certainly be sure to fix in the off season.

  18. #40
    President Stoopid Pegger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Communist Canada
    Posts
    4,692

    Default

    For those caught up on the stupidity of the rule can anyone make sense why a fumble at the 1 inch line stays with the offense, but if it's on the goaline or in the endzone it's a change of possession (touchback)?

    Or how can you have an offside on the defense (5 yard penalty), hold by the OL (10 yard penalty) and a pass interference by the D back (could be long yardage) and when it all happens at the same time we pretend nothing happened?

    There are many rules that don't make any sense. We've accepted them and work around them just because we've been exposed to them. This will be no different.
    Get your mind out of the gutter...

  19. #41
    Huevos Rancheros Burque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    6,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HeHateMe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Miller really should have recovered it and ran it in. That sucked.
    After the incomplete symbol, by the (incorrect) official, it would've been a dead ball had he recovered. I still think the old mantra about if "there is a ball on the ground pick it" up applies here though.
    The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.

  20. #42
    CBMB Legend Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    The refs blew it dead after the ball came out, that should count for something!
    when it was caught the play was still live, the refs blew it dead at the fumble, that is what should be ruled out.
    I know right from wrong. Wrong is the fun one.

    ďLetís eat GrandmaĒ or ďLetís eat, GrandmaĒ- Punctuation saves lives.

    I have an inferiority complex about my superiority complex.
    I know Iím better than you, but I feel really bad about it.

    If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it than how bad of a decision can it really be?
    Hidden Content

  21. #43
    CCS HoF: Class of 2014 HeHateMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    slums of shaolin
    Posts
    25,624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Burque View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    After the incomplete symbol, by the (incorrect) official, it would've been a dead ball had he recovered. I still think the old mantra about if there is a ball on the ground pick it up applies here though.

    It always applies. Idk why ppl are saying he couldn't because he absolutely could have.

  22. #44
    Huevos Rancheros Burque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    6,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pegger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For those caught up on the stupidity of the rule can anyone make sense why a fumble at the 1 inch line stays with the offense, but if it's on the goaline or in the endzone it's a change of possession (touchback)?

    Or how can you have an offside on the defense (5 yard penalty), hold by the OL (10 yard penalty) and a pass interference by the D back (could be long yardage) and when it all happens at the same time we pretend nothing happened?

    There are many rules that don't make any sense. We've accepted them and work around them just because we've been exposed to them. This will be no different.


    This rule makes perfect sense to me. If you start fumbling outside the endzone and it goes into and out of the endzone why would you get the ball back? Can you offer me a reason that would make any sense and where you would spot the ball?


    to the bit about multiple penalties what is your suggestion? I do not think stacking penalties makes any sense at all.
    The large print giveth and the small print taketh away.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •