Reply With QuoteDewey would do it for a reach around... if not for a favorOriginally Posted by nwfisch
I'll pay $100 to ban HawkWriter
Dewey would do it for a reach around... if not for a favor
I wish it wasn't in green...so then you really meant it and the $100 could then be turned around on CaptMoron
Why do you let him bother you so much?
He doesn't keep me up at night, I can assure you that.Why do you let him bother you so much?
He is a complete moron with his posts. He kills conversations and doesn't allow quality conversation between people who know shit with his posts. Also, I have an issue with someone who refuses to ever respond - the whole point of these sites are to have conversation.
$51.
Still waiting for our so called great secondary scoring people were drooling over.
Constantly waiting for Hossa, Kane, Sharp & Toews to do it all is going to catch up just like last yr when you have no secondary help.
They've giving up 73 goals already. Stan better address it soon or it'll be another short playoff stint.
Awesome win after being down 2, 2 minutes into the game.
Goals for "secondary scorers":
Stalberg-5
Montador-4
Bolland-7
Bickell-3
Frolik-3
And for comparison....
Toews-12
Sharp-10
Hossa-9
Kane-7
They really aren't too far apart. Bolland has as many as Kane and yet you think he sucks. Monty has been great and has 4. Stalberg has been playing well with 5.
ill match you.
Goals for "secondary scorers":
Stalberg-5
Montador-4
Bolland-7
Bickell-3
Frolik-3
And for comparison....
Toews-12
Sharp-10
Hossa-9
Kane-7
They really aren't too far apart. Bolland has as many as Kane and yet you think he sucks. Monty has been great and has 4. Stalberg has been playing well with 5.
...and of course Brunette with his 4 goals ...
Mind you Stalberg has 12 points in 20 games -which isn't really that bad.
OF course 20 of those goals were given up in the past 4 games (with 19 coming in 3 of them). . . but I'll give you that one- defense is important.
____
But of course, none of that matters ... forget getting 4 goals in about half of a period after being down early etc...
it really shouldn't require pledges to get rid of an obvious troll... although I do find it a little funny.
Last edited by southern_cross_116; 11-26-2011 at 03:22 AM.
Like I said in another thread the negatives are still being grout out after a win. Let alone complaining about goal scoring. It use to be amusing but now it is just getting way to old.
I understand criticizing the team, because sometimes they need it, but even after a win complaining about how we don't have goal scoring. Yeah, things could be a lot better, but right now the Hawks are finding a way to win. They'll figure it out eventually.
It's not that I dont mind criticizing the team. It's when the same players are posted over and over because they didn't score. It's really old now
Cawks said that he hates me posting so much that he leaves whenever he sees me post.
Maybe I will start post whoring the Hawks forum more and then nobody will have to cough up $50 (do it anyway though, Rush wants $$$).
EDIT: Damn it, my Fire Forum moderatorship doesn't give me ban hammer access.
Last edited by Jntg4; 11-26-2011 at 02:04 PM.
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
Lol aren't you the one who posts on his Facebook wall
No, I commented once on one of his anti-Stalberg posts and then he started posting on my wall about keeping it on the message board, lol.
Nice to see that it pissed him off anyway though.
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
Oh I know. I feel the exact same way.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks