OT: A Eulogy for the National League (DH)

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
NL_logo.png
The National League opened play yesterday in Miami, and it might be the last time it is truly significant to say the National League opened play. The death of the National League has been long coming. The domination of the American League in interleague play for years was a harbinger of things to come. Interleague play itself has ended a familiar way of life, and it is fitting that change should be the final undoing of the National League. Next year the Astros will move from the National League to the American League, and unless you live in Houston or are Lance Berkman you probably don’t care that much. This realignment will require interleague to be played all year round for the first time in baseball history, and the quaint tradition of playing by the rules of the home team’s ballpark will have to end.

The senior circuit is used to having the advantage. The very reason the DH was instituted in the American League to begin with was because of the domination of the National League. Those days have long since passed us by with the American League surpassing the National League in talent, but now that rule change meant to close the gap between the two leagues is going to become permanent. It is only a matter of time at this point.

American League teams have been complaining since the beginning of interleague about having their pitchers bat and not being able to use their DHs in NL parks. The union will not allow the loss of pay for a starting position. Fans for the most part would rather see the 10-9 games of the previous decade than the 2-1 games that baseball seems to be returning. So when the calls for having one set of rules overwhelm tradition it will be the National League that dies.

I have always been a National League guy. It should be natural considering the team I have rooted for since childhood was a National League club, and perhaps it is just nostalgia that makes me lament the end of National League ball. But I will miss the strategy. I miss the natural order of the lineup. I will miss the role of the eighth hitter in the National League lineup. I will miss the creativity of guys like Tony La Russa batting pitchers eighth. I will miss the differences in watching guys like Carlos Zambrano and Matt Garza hitting. And I don’t think it is wrong to feel a sense of loss at the way the National League has played baseball for 136 years and counting at this point.

I have long resented the designated hitter. There is something fundamental at odds with the spirit of the game. The designated hitter is supposed to remove the weakness of one position and replacing it with a player whose strength is that weakness. Pitchers are generally bad at hitting so lets allow a guy who can mash to hit for him. We have a guy that is a terrific hitter but a butcher in the field. If the point of baseball was to let players only do what they were best at why not have designated runners or fielders. It would make the game more exciting. Or for that matter why not just allow free substitutions to allow for the best matchups to occur throughout the game because that would be more exciting than watching a scrub middle reliever face a catcher hitting below the Mendoza line.

The reason we don’t do that is because the spirit of baseball is that the ball finds you as the saying goes. This devalues guys that are good at lots of things and instead puts the emphasis on players that are highly skilled in one area but flawed otherwise. A pitcher that could hit a little was always a useful advantage for the NL manager because he could leaving the pitcher in longer. That no longer matters in the American League game where the manager only has to concern himself with the matchup between the pitcher and batter.

And I will miss the double switch. Or rather I will miss watching managers comically overuse the double switch as if just to prove that they were a National League manager. But it was a thing of beauty to be able to play armchair manager as the pitcher spot was rolling around in the batting order. The mental gymnastics of what combinations would create the ideal situations in the following half inning and beyond was part of the fun of watching a game that many consider slow. Instead I will be treated in the near future to push button managing where the need for pinch hitters will be minimal and the focus will be on pitting the strength of players against another players strength instead of the National League stratagem of minimizing the weaknesses of your players.

Nothing has been said about this coming apocalypse to what has been baseball for 150 years. The change has only been hinted at by a few astute writers and commentators, but whether the world of the National League ends in the appropriate year of 2012 or later matters very little. The way that I and many of my ilk who favor the National League will be out of luck in the very near future as the game will be fundamental change for the first time since the introduction of the DH in 1973. So goodbye to double switches and strategy. Goodbye to actual baseball whenever it may come.
 
Last edited:

Shawon0Meter

PLAYOFFS?!?
Donator
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
5,444
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
Minnesota
This reminds me, I heard Tim Kurkjian say that there's 6 teams better in the AL than the best team in the NL and I had a hard time disagreeing.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
The best in the AL is better than the best of the NL. The bottom teams in both leagues are pretty terrible, and one benefit to the Astros moving is it adds the worst team in baseball to the AL.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Unless pitchers learn to hit better (unlikely) the AL will always be better offensively than the NL. By proxy, the AL will be forced to have better pitchers than the NL. If the NL wants to keep up, they either have to A- teach their pitchers that hitting doesn't have to look like an epileptic seizure or B- adopt the DH.

One is more likely than the other. Sorry.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
By the way, I hate the DH. But I hate easy outs much more.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
Unless pitchers learn to hit better (unlikely) the AL will always be better offensively than the NL. By proxy, the AL will be forced to have better pitchers than the NL. If the NL wants to keep up, they either have to A- teach their pitchers that hitting doesn't have to look like an epileptic seizure or B- adopt the DH.

One is more likely than the other. Sorry.

I know that the NL is going to lose this debate. That was kind of the point of my lament.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I know that the NL is going to lose this debate. That was kind of the point of my lament.

I was agreeing with you. Stop being so serious!

:cubstroll:
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
OT: The Designated Hitter

This article was just posted on HBT:

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/10/why-the-cardinals-would-never-move-to-the-al/

You can see my comment there:

I abhor the DH, but when…

1. Pitchers look like frightened deer in the batter’s box;

2. Everyone in the stadium, from the fans to the broadcasters to the pitcher’s own manager, knows that he is an almost-certain out;

3. When the pitcher himself makes no effort to get to first base on a bunt or an otherwise-difficult ground ball;

4. …and when the minor leagues use the DH about half the time and therefore make no effort to hone this “skill”…

…it’s probably time to let go.

It'd be great if all pitchers could pitch well AND hit like Fergie or Carlos Zambrano, but compared to their counterpart #9 hitters in the AL, Fergie and Z still sucked. It's impossible to devote enough time in the day to hone both the pitching and the hitting, not to mention the fact that the pitcher additionally has to learn how to field his position and to master baserunning on the off chance that he actually gets on base.

Enjoy this one :woot:
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
You guys must be all at work :lol:
 

2SeamHeat

I Know Nuffing!!!!!
Joined:
Aug 15, 2011
Posts:
897
Liked Posts:
188
Location:
West Texas
Nah, I don't think any of us wish to so much as think about the NL incorporating the DH, nonetheless discuss it. ;)
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Nope, just like real baseball. :troll:

I'd like real baseball more if the bloody pitcher could hit :lol: And I say that with all the hate in the world for the DH.
 

Mr. Cub

2016 World Series Champs!
Joined:
Dec 13, 2010
Posts:
4,857
Liked Posts:
1,039
Location:
Earth
I am not really in to changing how the game has been played for the last forever, but having/watching pitchers try to hit sucks. It kills rallies and it rarely leads to any good for the team. It is almost a guaranteed 2-3 outs a game. I actually wouldn't mind a DH move to the NL.
 

2SeamHeat

I Know Nuffing!!!!!
Joined:
Aug 15, 2011
Posts:
897
Liked Posts:
188
Location:
West Texas
I'd like real baseball more if the bloody pitcher could hit :lol: And I say that with all the hate in the world for the DH.

Oh I agree. Didn't use to be this way either. Pitchers may not have always been real hitters... but it's only been the past 20 years or so when they've become almost guaranteed outs. Guys like Ryan used to preach working out in the batting cages at least twice a week and taking batting practice the day before and of a start when he was with Houston. Now, it seems like only a few pitchers ever dare to try to take batting practice once ST ends. Hell, I remember Lasorda and Herzogg preaching about the importance of pitchers working on their hitting and baserunning almost as much as their pitching in the 80s and early 90s. Then, a few years ago, LaRussa made it mandatory for his SPs to take batting practice before every start and one other time during the week... and the baseball world seemed to want to crucify him. "Why make pitchers work that much harder?" Maybe because it benefits them and their team in the end... and maybe because pitchers are being babied too much these days to begin with.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
Remember a couple years back when a Yankee pitcher got injured running the bases and the Steinbrenners flipped because pitchers aren't supposed to do that? Yeah, it's kind of like that.
 

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
The National League using the Designated Hitter in the future? I could see it happening
 

Top