Gar hints that team will look for point guard while Rose heals
NO.
HINRICH
25.6 MPG, 41.4 FG%, 34.6 3pt%, 78.1 FT%, 2.8apg, 0.8spg, 6.6ppg
CJ WATSON
23.7 MPG, 36.8 FG%, 39.3 3pt%, 80.8 FT%, 4.1apg, 0.9spg, 9.7ppg
We have something better than Hinrich. We need something better than CJ Watson.
1.Nash
2.Miller
3.Dragic
4.Bayless
Last edited by thechosenone; 05-17-2012 at 06:43 AM.
HInrich is a shell of himself. So no.
Nash will want starters money. He has already come out and said he feels he can start for 3 more years and is reluctant to take a back up role, unless he absolutely has to.
2011-2012 stats comparison from all players mentioned
Code:Rk Player Season Age G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS 1 Jerryd Bayless 2011-12 23 31 11 705 117 276 .424 44 104 .423 75 88 .852 8 58 66 118 24 4 53 70 353 2 Goran Dragic 2011-12 25 66 28 1752 277 600 .462 68 202 .337 153 190 .805 53 115 168 351 85 10 157 166 775 3 Kirk Hinrich 2011-12 31 48 31 1237 122 295 .414 47 136 .346 25 32 .781 11 90 101 132 38 11 58 100 316 4 Andre Miller 2011-12 35 66 7 1809 242 552 .438 18 83 .217 137 169 .811 53 168 221 441 63 9 177 133 639 5 Steve Nash 2011-12 37 62 62 1961 295 555 .532 55 141 .390 127 142 .894 26 160 186 664 38 8 229 53 772 6 C.J. Watson 2011-12 27 49 25 1159 161 437 .368 68 173 .393 84 104 .808 21 84 105 200 45 8 97 103 474Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
If Nash is not coming, I wouldn't mind Bayless or Dragic.
Nash is going to Miami, the teams that can afford to pay him starters money he will have absolutely no interest in.
"What are you doin Dragic? Did you not get the memo?" Come to chicago...
I believe that the best choice is Bayless. And the reasons why I believe this are:
1.He is mostly a SG so when Rose will be back he will be our starter or bench SG
2.If he starts the game he can score 30 points in a game
3.He is a 42.3% 3pt shooter
4.He is a 85.2% free throw shooter
5.He won't have a problem being a bench player. He was a bench player in a worse team.
6.He won't be expensive.
7.He is 23 years old.
But Dragic would be nice too. He is a great player and a way better PG than CJ Watson and Bayless.
Last edited by thechosenone; 05-17-2012 at 09:05 AM.
Good luck affording some of those guys.Originally Posted by thechosenone
If we can't afford a better player than Watson then what's the point of getting a worse player than Watson? Το replace Lucas? We can get Mike James for this.
Last edited by thechosenone; 05-17-2012 at 10:11 AM.
Who do you think the Bulls will get?
Who is affordable?
Watson will be back and they'll draft a PG.
What cj Watson can't lead us to a title
Bayless!!!!!
Hmm...
Do you think that this will solve the problem?
I personally don't think so.
CJ hasn't been playing good enough and a PG from the draft will most likely be worse than CJ, at least in his first season
Who in the draft could we get that would be better than Watson. With our spot in the draft nobody.
Teague could slip to the late 20's.
Not sure. Watson will likely be back though.
just an FYI...this site is garbage
Looks pretty close to the others I have seen on the net..my first time on that site
DraftExpress: Mock Draft
Is this any better?
I have seen some sites saying we will get lamb.
As a UK fan, I can chime in on Lamb and Teague.
Lamb is a solid shooter, like Korver, but better. He sees the court better and actually defends well. He doesn't have much size, but he's a reliable outside threat with good speed to go with it. If he is available when the Bulls are up, he is a great choice.
As for Teague, I honestly don't think he's ready to start at PG in the NBA yet. Having him fill in for Rose would be a big role for him to fill in his first year out of college. He has a lot of potential, but I honestly believe he should've stayed at least one more year at UK.
Uhh. May want to rephrase that.
Plus thought you were an ND fan.
ND football and I follow their basketball team a bit. I only like UK basketball though.Uhh. May want to rephrase that.
Plus thought you were an ND fan.
As for Lamb, he can't really create his own shot. He's a spot-up guy mostly. In two years at UK, he shot around 47% from the field and over 47% from beyond the arc compared to Korver's 43% and 41% from deep. Granted the NBA and college are vastly different and his two years are a small sample size compared to Korver's career in the NBA, but I think he has the ability to be a better shooter than Korver in the long run.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks