- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,433
- Location:
- Chicago
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,122
- Liked Posts:
- 1,642
- Location:
- Misery
If the Hawks got anything decent in return, I'd say to make it happen. Need that salary dump.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Hammer, stalberg and beach for gagner 
ray:
Sent from my Motorola Xoom Tablet using Tapatalk
ray:Sent from my Motorola Xoom Tablet using Tapatalk
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,122
- Liked Posts:
- 1,642
- Location:
- Misery
Hammer, stalberg and beach for gagner
Sent from my Motorola Xoom Tablet using Tapatalk
I'd do it.
HawkWriter
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts:
- 3,491
- Liked Posts:
- 1,341
A Hammer for Gagner (base of a trade) makes a lot is sense for both teams. It has been reported for a while that the Oil had interest in Hammer, Subban, and just about any other available Dman.
- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,947
- Liked Posts:
- 3,118
Sign me up for a Hammer plus for Gagner swap.
- Joined:
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts:
- 485
- Liked Posts:
- 165
- Location:
- Texas
You know, I hate to sound like a sentimentalist, and he's SUCKED since he's been gone, and maybe it was just that he played with the Wizzer, but Cam Barker just came available on the cheap.
Trade Hammer and a spare part and get Gagner and sign Barker. Mmmmm...
As an aside, much as I have disliked Stalberg in the past, you can't get wheels like that and 20+ goals a season for what we're paying him. His production isn't huge and he misses open nets like that's his job, but he's pretty much a bargain. I'd be loathe to shed him at the price we're paying. Replacing his production and speed would cost an arm and a leg.
Trade Hammer and a spare part and get Gagner and sign Barker. Mmmmm...
As an aside, much as I have disliked Stalberg in the past, you can't get wheels like that and 20+ goals a season for what we're paying him. His production isn't huge and he misses open nets like that's his job, but he's pretty much a bargain. I'd be loathe to shed him at the price we're paying. Replacing his production and speed would cost an arm and a leg.
Diehardfan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,260
- Liked Posts:
- 6,680
- Location:
- Western Burbs
My favorite teams
Not against the trade but just questioning why it should be Hammer plus. I know Hammer isnt the greatest dman but Gagner isnt great by any stretch either. He had 47 pts last year but 8 of them came against the Hawks when they folded their tent early. He's a 14-15 goal guy....not exactly a star in the making. Make the deal even up.
HawkWriter
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts:
- 3,491
- Liked Posts:
- 1,341
Please no. Cam Barker is not a fit on this team except for being on the PP. After that, he might open up more holes than he plugs.
- Joined:
- May 29, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,248
- Liked Posts:
- 553
- Location:
- Des Moines IA
I agree, the hawks already did the Cam Barker experiment no need to rehash it.
- Joined:
- Apr 23, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,227
- Liked Posts:
- 1,551
- Location:
- Rockford, IL
No to Barker. I wouldn't send 2 roster players for Gagner. It'd have to be Hammer, spec, and maybe a pick.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
If we get Barker, can we trade him for a nick leddy again?
Btw, WHERE THE FUCK IS KIM JOHNSSON?
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
Btw, WHERE THE FUCK IS KIM JOHNSSON?
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,061
- Liked Posts:
- 7,246
which clearly we dont need any help with.
HawkWriter
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts:
- 3,491
- Liked Posts:
- 1,341
Did you somehow manage to not read the next 10 or so words after that? Do you really get that excited when I post that you attempt to start shit by agreeing (when trying to make it seem like disagreeing) with me in what is supposed to be a backhanded comment towards my way?
Clearly he would help on the PP but in my opinion he would open up other holes, especially with his lack of PK ability and how bad he is 5on5.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,061
- Liked Posts:
- 7,246
as a 6th man he wouldnt be bad to have.
I think you need to get over yourself. Just expressing my opinion. It is ok for me to do that, and really you shouldnt be all to mad about it since you have a tremendous following in the hawks forum with some fans that just dont have a thought. So relax, and be very proud.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
He would not be a good fit here...
And why do you care so much who likes hawkwriter anyway?
Yea yea i know..
"Lulz and stuffz"
Did i forget something?
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,061
- Liked Posts:
- 7,246
He would not be a good fit here...
And why do you care so much who likes hawkwriter anyway?
Yea yea i know..
"Lulz and stuffz"
Did i forget something?
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
I dont. Just pointing out how he shouldnt get bent out of shape when I disagree with him. Trying to make sure he stays positive and...........
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoaktW-Lu38]Always Look On The Bright Side of Life - Life Of Brian (Monty Python) Lyrics - YouTube[/ame]
HawkWriter
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts:
- 3,491
- Liked Posts:
- 1,341
My whole point is that you didn't even disagree with me...yet you attempt to make it look like you did by taking what I said out of context.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,061
- Liked Posts:
- 7,246
sorry. I should have said:
1) 6th man is ok if top 4 gets an upgrade
2) We need the help on the PP so he should be fine.
again as a 6th man.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
You know Q...bottom pair defenseman dont get pp time
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
