Doesn't mean anything. He's saying that because as a player he's supposed to not let the rumors affect his routine.Originally Posted by DewsSox79
dempster just left wrigley and was asked about tomorrow. " Im planning on pitching tomorrow night "
Doesn't mean anything. He's saying that because as a player he's supposed to not let the rumors affect his routine.
Signatures are overrated.
...But as a Cub?
just sayin. its to the point where if he poops it gets posted.
will there be a surprise team?
Sent from my USCfans guide to being an uneducated baseball fan using Tapatalk
I think the surprise is whether Sori is involved or not. That could get real dicey with both of them having to agree to go.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Brett Jackson could be in a package with Dempster?
I read yesterday that Jackson is probably being called up.
But again I would be okay with trading Jackson. The luster is coming off of him as a prospect and we have a ton of talented OF in Sczcur, Soler, Almora.
Depending on what happens with Pence and Victorino, the Cubs may end up losing all the leverage here in trying to package an OF with Dempster to LA.
Kaplan
http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-c...37&feedID=8487
Says their are three suitors for Dempster and basically is playing the Dempster is holding out for LA til the last second but will cave if their a deal to go to a contender angle. Not sure if I buy it, but the other suitors are the Rangers and Yankees.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Dodgers are close to get VIctorino fro Lindbloom and another prospect (hope for Phils sake the 2nd player is the big one). Can pretty much rule out the Demp-Sori LA scenarios now.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Heyman says the Yanks aren't in on Dempster. http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/jo...in-a-staredown
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Stark also saying the Yanks are shooting down interest in Dempster. Danny Knobler correctly summarizes the more the Cubs float other teams being interested in Dempster the clearer it becomes that LA is the only option.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Josh Lindbloom and Ethan Martin is the return for Victorino.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Rosenthal is saying that the Dodgers had two big deals that are unlikely now but also says that Dodgers remained focused on Dempster.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Well the Dodgers seem to be heavily involved on Dodgers according to the national guys on twitter. I am wondering if the Dodgers real offer for Dempster (and no I don't mean Reed, Lee or Webster) is going to be made now that they've got the bullpen arm and bats they wanted. Garrett Gould and Aaron Miller has been my prediction for a while.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Bowden says Dempster deal to LA is done except for dotting i's and crossing t's.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Bye Bye Dempsta
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
New thread time?
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
Yeah, I'll close this one. To the new thread!
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks