Reply With QuoteBernier would be awesome!
wait... someone would take Frolik? GO STAN! GO NOW!Originally Posted by DewsSox79
Bernier would be awesome!
HockeyyInsiderr on twitter has hawks in talks with sabers. Kane for Miller are the two huge pieces other players would be involved.
ESPN Bracketology - First 4 out. As of Jan 15th
are you serious?
Don't think Miller is worth Kaner, just don't see it.
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
please make it happen!Hockeyy Insiderr@HockeyyInsiderr
Nothing imminent as of right now, but 2 sources did confirm to me that Miller for Kane discussions are back on. #Sabres #Blackhawks
Only 15th in Goalie Point Shares last year too... pretty much just average.
EDIT: Scratch that, 12th, but still not top of the line.
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
Again why I'm not a fan of stats like these...
Miller came off a concussion last year after being train wrecked by Lucic. Something very important to note. Miller is a very solid goaltender and would likely thrive on a team like the Blackhawks.
I would do it in a heartbeat. Miller is lights out on the big stage. In Chicago and playing with a team that has a legit shot, i think his game would get back to 2010 Olympics style.
ESPN Bracketology - First 4 out. As of Jan 15th
I dont post much, but when I do, I prefer to make it count.
ESPN Bracketology - First 4 out. As of Jan 15th
so you would pray for a lock out,which could very well negatively impact the sport that you so covet, and hurt it from an exposure perspective?for a lock out so I don't have to hear the Hawks brass sucking off these so called great "prospects".
a lockout could hurt the sport's popularity, which in turn might hurt the sport from an exposure and coverage perspective
as a hockey fan, that probably wouldn't be a good thing
i also don't understand how someone who seems to like hockey so much would want an entire season of it completely skipped
it just makes no sense
We already don't have enough Top 6 forwards... and with the question marks on Hossa and the odds Stalberg keeps it up... I don't want to be left with a Top 6 of Toews, Sharp, an unhealthy Hossa, and three should-be-third-liners.
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
So you'd rather not play at all? WTF?
I guess we should just take your scouting report than, i mean brunette is good at board battles, standing in front of the net and stuffz.
I want this to happen, but the concussion thing for:
1) is always scary
2) still didnt impact as much on the GPs side as hawkwriter suggested as the following are his SV% and GP the last few years
06/07 63 GP .911
07/08 76 GP .906
08/09 59 GP .918
09/10 69 GP .929
10/11 66 GP .916
11/12 63 GP .916
High water mark of GP is 07/08 so I think its a little silly to say "oh his concussion is somethingz importantz to notez" when debating a PS when his games played are right around is career norm....but I guess some people dont look at stats, just what they see on the nhl network.
anyway. If this can be done, please do it like now!!!
just ignore him please, if your gonna turn every single one of his posts into an argument just ignore him
every one of his posts are wrong, and misdirected. If I see someone throwing a rubber ball against the wall trying to get it to stick, I will call them out. That is why he is the strawman. He also goes to "you're a modz and im here for goodszz discussionz" when he cant get himself out of a debate.
JNTG doesnt know a whole lot about hockey, but he is new to the sport and still learning, posters like that I can lay off of, but so called "i know everything but I dont look at any statsz" users I will call out every.single.time.
Alright alright fair enough. For future reference don't go calling me out because with Hockey I know next to nothing, pretty much awhen it comes the the Hawks
Also I try reading posts in here to learn about hockey but all I've learned is that it's fun to say boardz battlez with firez and passionz and stuffz
This is the best post I have read in a while!Alright alright fair enough. For future reference don't go calling me out because with Hockey I know next to nothing, pretty much a
Also I try reading posts in here to learn about hockey but all I've learned is that it's fun to say boardz battlez with firez and passionz and stuffz
That's why i picked it up tooAlright alright fair enough. For future reference don't go calling me out because with Hockey I know next to nothing, pretty much a
Also I try reading posts in here to learn about hockey but all I've learned is that it's fun to say boardz battlez with firez and passionz and stuffz
Pft, I now know why I stay far away from this forum (posting wise).
HawkPoster thinks he's a know it all about hockey.
Maybe TSN should hire him.
Stay far away then
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
And hockeyyinsiderr is a hack...ignore
Sent via Tapatalk on Droid RAZR MAXX
Yeah im only in this section when I get bored. Its either no one posting, or something stupid coming from one of the users.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks