Reply With Quotetitle is deserving for sure.
Shitty Twins at Shitty White Sox IST: 9/3/12-9/5/12
Samuel Deduno vs Hector Santiago
Scott Diamond vs Jose Quintana
PJ Walters vs Jake Peavy
2013 Attendance Tracker: 3-1
title is deserving for sure.
Grumpy old men
72-61=shitty
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
they will be shitty if they dont make the playoffs. just like in 06 when they won 90 games and didnt make the playoffs.Originally Posted by Jntg4
72-61=shitty
anything short of a world series ring is a failure in my book. ALDS, ALCS, etc....all that would be is an extended season
Not only are you ignorant on baseball, you are ignorant on the Sox. Would it be disappointing? Yes, but not a failure by any means. Very Successful seas especially given what we had and all the injuries we suffered.
Hidden Content
Follow Me on Twitter: @sportsdream - Sports Tweets, Life, God, etc.
>= .500 = not shitty
Chicago Championships:Chicago Bears (9): 1921, 1932, 1933, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1963, 1985
Chicago Blackhawks (4): 1934, 1938, 1961, 2010
Chicago Bulls (6): 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Chicago Cardinals (2): 1925, 1947
Chicago Cubs (8): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1907, 1908
Chicago Fire (5): 1998 (MLS); 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006 (USOC)
Chicago Sting (2): 1981, 1984
Chicago Whales (1): 1915
Chicago White Sox (4): 1901, 1906, 1917, 2005
Chicago (41): 1876, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1885, 1886, 1901, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1915, 1917, 1921, 1925, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1938, 1940, 1941, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1961, 1963, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2010
Who Will Win Chicago's 42nd?
Best Chance in 2013: Hidden Content Hidden Content
I say forget what happened on the most recent road trip. The Sox have a 10 game homestand coming up. Time to get some home cooking going. This is a series that the Sox can sweep.
What is your addiction with Dews?
72-61 is not a dissapointing record. Sure it could be better but the Sox have already surpassed my expectations for 2012.
It is more than a little funny that you call someone out for being addicted to a poster here.
Warning, the following may be Not Safe For Work or a storyline spoiler.
Are these starting Pitchers or the first two fights in the next UFC event?
Hidden Content -- Go here. Good shirts, good quality, good prices.
Fantasy Mock Draft:
QB - M, Ryan (1)
RB - A. Foster (2)
WR(x3) - A. Johnson (4), D Thomas (6), M. Wallace (9)
TE - H. Miller (19)
OT(x2) - J. Bushrod (10), R. Reiff (16)
OG(x2) - D. DeCastro (14)
OC - B. Meester (20)
DT(x2) - C. Liuget (18)
DE(x2) - C. Johnson (5), M. Wilkerson (15)
CB(x2) - M. Claiborne (8), D. McCourty (11)
S(x2) - M. Barron (13), B. Pollard (17)
LB(x3) - C. Matthews (3), N. Bowman (7) B. Wagner (12)
If you feel that making the post season or being over .500 is a success than so be it, those are low standards. The only thing that is a success is winning the WS. It doesnt matter what SI and analysts said about the sox before the season, the fact is they still have a lot of talent on this team that should be contending for the playoffs so it shouldnt be a surprise.
oh and keep neg repping me with your lovely obession.
Ironic. Dews loved more than me yet Dews is the one attacking. :Sigh:
Hidden Content
Follow Me on Twitter: @sportsdream - Sports Tweets, Life, God, etc.
websters dictionary has the def of the word attacking. please look it up.
you have a complex.
Yeah, of getting you away from me.
Hidden Content
Follow Me on Twitter: @sportsdream - Sports Tweets, Life, God, etc.
so back to the subject..........
sox really really need to bring the bats out and get back to owning 1st place. A lot can be said if they do this from a mental aspect. get back to winning and feeling good. Santiago needs a strong start, no walks as he faces a shitload of lefties!
Im worried about the quintana start the most...just because of josh willingham who owns him.
Who ever thought of the format for this troll is fantastic. There is a similar troll on my Mets forum I post at.Yeah, of getting you away from me.
2013 Attendance Tracker: 3-1
They've never faced this pitcher before, so they'll probably get owned.
Win two, and lets get back on top.
2013 Attendance Tracker: 3-1
You post on a Mets forum? I love the Mets. One of my favorite and most rare collectibles is a Let's Do It Again Mets can from RC without the end on it. I might be the only one that still has one.
Hidden Content
Follow Me on Twitter: @sportsdream - Sports Tweets, Life, God, etc.
901 is a mets fan?
Mets are my NL team.
2013 Attendance Tracker: 3-1
If this isn't a free "bounce back hand me out", I don't know what is. They will sweep the Twins. If they don't, it may be time to enter panic mode.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks