All Things Theo/Ricketts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
So is somebody going to explain why losing 100 times is acceptable? Its looking like a double dip too...

Can Willrust explain why Eric Chavez wouldnt be a benefit to this team at 3B besides bullshit assimilations to Mark Prior and citing how his 4 million is too expensive?

Can somebody explain from their 'dinner date' at the Epstein Mansion about what the gameplan is this offseason after the cubs likely lose another 100 games?

Where did Martini get that hilarious picture of Derrek Rose?


[video=youtube;1E6IfdUJn6s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E6IfdUJn6s[/video]



Sorry Patg006. Does this answer your question?
 

mountsalami

New member
Joined:
Aug 19, 2012
Posts:
854
Liked Posts:
1,129
Location:
Rectal Cavity
Boobaby1; Couldn't resist Salami. Will you forgive me?[/QUOTE said:
[video=youtube;erqJF_ppqbk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erqJF_ppqbk&feature=player_detailpage[/video]






I certainly do my friend.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Lets see:

Shitty moves:

Viz DL. Maholm 6-4 3.74 ERA 10 starts. Bad trade.

Signing Baker who is out til Aug for 5 mil....yippy.

DJ LeMahieu .294/.333/.353 at Col. for Ian Shitshorts hitting .095/.174/.095 in Iowa.

Break even moves:

Rizzo .263/.324/.505 for Cashner 4-2 3.38 ERA Yep this is looking break even.

Wood 4-3 2.73 ERA for Marshall 0-1 2.57 ERA Marshall has been on the DL but still is one of the best set ups in the league.


Good moves so far: Signing Soler about it. Villenueva fell out of the rotation. Feldman still hasn't pitch 6 mil value yet. Early on Jackson but so far a bust.

I'm lacking faith with this track record of bumbling.
 

The Bandit

vick27m
Donator
Joined:
Oct 18, 2010
Posts:
2,077
Liked Posts:
580
Location:
The open road
Lets see:

Shitty moves:

Viz DL. Maholm 6-4 3.74 ERA 10 starts. Bad trade.

Signing Baker who is out til Aug for 5 mil....yippy.

DJ LeMahieu .294/.333/.353 at Col. for Ian Shitshorts hitting .095/.174/.095 in Iowa.

Break even moves:

Rizzo .263/.324/.505 for Cashner 4-2 3.38 ERA Yep this is looking break even.

Wood 4-3 2.73 ERA for Marshall 0-1 2.57 ERA Marshall has been on the DL but still is one of the best set ups in the league.


Good moves so far: Signing Soler about it. Villenueva fell out of the rotation. Feldman still hasn't pitch 6 mil value yet. Early on Jackson but so far a bust.

I'm lacking faith with this track record of bumbling.

well, Maholm was signed as a hopeful for a decent spec return, and at the time even injured Viz was a good spec so it was a win in the aspect of why it was made, Baker... still not sure why he was brought in in the first place, Ian Stewart... we've gone over that trip already... Rizzo deal eh I'd lean towards the Cubs... if we didn't have Rizzo what would we have at 1B right now Bryan Lahair? Arms are easier to replace then a power position like 1B, plus the D. Gotta llve it, Wood deal for the Cubs is a win, numbers don't tell the story, Marshall was off loaded as a late inning specialist/possible closer for a left handed young arm that could be good, and Wood is progressing pretty well, so the Cubs are doing well for what they were looking for. the good listed were good, Jackson, bust but I doubt it's gonna be a bust the whole time.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Maholm was signed as a hopeful for a decent spec return

Dumb to do. Dumb to support it. Just justifying them being cheap.


Rizzo deal eh I'd lean towards the Cubs... if we didn't have Rizzo what would we have at 1B right now Bryan Lahair?

Fielder was on the market. Again they chose to be cheap.

Wood deal for the Cubs is a win, numbers don't tell the story, Marshall was off loaded as a late inning specialist/possible closer for a left handed young arm that could be good,

Right now we have Fuji playing DL carousel, Camp over the hill, Marmol a turd and a miracle closing right now vs a sure thing. See above, retain Maholm Wood not needed. Retain Cashner the potential loss of Garza is lessened. No need to overspend on Jackson. Feldman has been ok as a #5. Villenueva is fine as a 6th man.

Think about it:

If they did what I wanted them to do:

Retain A-Ram, Sign Fielder and went after Cespedes vs Soler.

Rotation last year would have been:

Dempster, Garza, Shark, Maholm, Zambrano, Cashner (injured) (didn't get into the trade for Z for a loser)

This year:

Shark, Garza, Cashner, Maholm, Feldman Saved 13 mil on not signing Jax and could have used it towards retaining Garza or put into Fielder's salary.

Team:
LF: Sori, CF Dejesus, RF Cespedes, 3B A-Ram, SS Castro, 2B DJ (Barney sux), 1B Fielder, C Castillo

That team could fight for a play off spot for years.

VS this joke going on.

Bottom like was they didn't want to get into a mega deal. So they went cheap and are tossing seasons away to get better picks and more allotment towards drafting and failing on to overseas market. Fuji is not young at all and has been injured.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Anyways I'm all about using the draft to build talent but not putting the minor league system ahead of the major league team.

With all the cash they invested into the front office you would figure they would be able to get quality players late round as Theo had to do in Bost. vs depending on high draft picks to rebuild....silly really.

An the F/A signings...just to aquire talent....Viz busted arm and Christian sucking in Tenn....great return values...
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
well, Maholm was signed as a hopeful for a decent spec return, and at the time even injured Viz was a good spec so it was a win in the aspect of why it was made,

Wrong.

There has been zero spec return as Vizcaino has yet to even throw a competitive pitch.

Total negative move.


Ian Stewart... we've gone over that trip already...
Yep, we sure have gone over it.

Totally dumb move.


arms are easier to replace then a power position like 1B, plus the D.

Clearly you have no understanding of how baseball works.

Arms are not even close to being easier to replace than the power positions.

Well at least not in real life, not sure about whatever make believe fairy tale world you are clearly living on.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
arms are easier to replace then a power position like 1B, plus the D.
Clearly you have no understanding of how baseball works.

Arms are not even close to being easier to replace than the power positions.

Well at least not in real life, not sure about whatever make believe fairy tale world you are clearly living on.

He said arms. Not quality arms.

Cashner could end up a 1 or a 2. That is a quality arm. He must be thinking Feldman quality when he was thinking of an easy arm to attain.
 

The Bandit

vick27m
Donator
Joined:
Oct 18, 2010
Posts:
2,077
Liked Posts:
580
Location:
The open road
Clearly you have no understanding of how baseball works.

Arms are not even close to being easier to replace than the power positions.

Well at least not in real life, not sure about whatever make believe fairy tale world you are clearly living on.

There are your reading skills at its finest. Arms are very easy to acquire, the quality is the real question. Free Agency is packed full of both good decent and bad arms none the less there are far more to acquire then a power hitting first baseman.

He said arms. Not quality arms.

Cashner could end up a 1 or a 2. That is a quality arm. He must be thinking Feldman quality when he was thinking of an easy arm to attain.

This.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Originally Posted by CSF77
He said arms. Not quality arms.

Cashner could end up a 1 or a 2. That is a quality arm. He must be thinking Feldman quality when he was thinking of an easy arm to attain.
This.
The fact you feel that signing a #5 on a bottom cellar is a good thing brings up more questions.

1. You seem to think that trading ML quality pitchers for TJ cheaper projects are ok.
2. You feel that it is ok to back fill the rotation with fringe talent as long as they are used to flip more questionable crap.


...........:bizarro:................................

Funny thing is:

Fielder:........12-13:$23M annually. 14-20:$24M annually
A Ram:........12:$6M, 13:$10M, 14:$16M, 15: mutual option ($4M buyout)
Cespedes:....12:$6.5M, 13:$8.5M, 14:$10.5M, 15:$10.5M
Maholm........12:$4.25M, 13:$6.5M club option ($0.5M buyout)
Marshall:........................13:$4.5M, 14:$5.5M, 15:$6.5M
Cashner:.................1 year/$0.5008M (2013) (Arb 1 next year)
LaMahieu.................min deal say .500M
2013: 53.5 mil here.

Add the rest:
Sori: 18 Mil
Garza: 10.25M
Marmol: 9.8M
Feldman: 6 M
Castro: 5M
Villanueva: 5M
Dejesus: 4.25M
Shark 2.64M
Navarro: 1.75M
Russell: 1.075M
Gregg .500M
Barney: .562M
Castillo: .500M

4 more .500 bench/pen filler. 2 mil
66.252M

Total: 119.752M Just under a 120M payroll which is doable as they have done it.
Looking at 2014:

9.8 mil off the books from Marmol. Gregg is providing that anyways.


Garza coming up but do you want to spend big on a #3 now. Shark and Cashner would be the 1-2 going forward. Might be better to look into a LH starter top of the rotation. (Trade for Price ie cash some chips that the farm is developing)

Maholm would still be a bargain as a back of the rotation as would Feldman. Or they could replace with more easy to attain F/A's.


Looking at it they could have done a better job and been in competition for a play off spot every year with out getting into 150 mil payrolls.
 

Willrust

New member
Joined:
May 1, 2013
Posts:
442
Liked Posts:
34
Kinda funny how everyone pisses and moans about Epstein/Hoyer "forcing" Ramirez out by not offering him an extension of more than 1 year, yet nobody mentions the fact that the previous management tried trading Ramirez only to be rebuffed by his executing the no trade clause in his agreement.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Kinda funny how everyone pisses and moans about Epstein/Hoyer "forcing" Ramirez out by not offering him an extension of more than 1 year, yet nobody mentions the fact that the previous management tried trading Ramirez only to be rebuffed by his executing the no trade clause in his agreement.

Again that was because of injuries and payroll issues. On top of it payroll was in the 145 mil range vs 120 mil range as I laid out being possible.

Silly argument.

Also I never was one of the guys saying get rid of him. Even back then 3B was a premium spot in the league and even injured A-Ram was considered one of the best.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
To be honest Vitters would have to produce this year and on to over come the loss of A-Rams production going forward.

Christian I do not believe is anything more then a back up. Dude can't hit over .250 at AA.
Candi at A ball was over rated and is proving why.

Geiger IS the best 3B in the system and he is not even considered a prospect.

Go figure.

Continue to tell me why not extending A-Ram was a bright idea and show me the wonderful 3B replacement.
 

Willrust

New member
Joined:
May 1, 2013
Posts:
442
Liked Posts:
34
To be honest Vitters would have to produce this year and on to over come the loss of A-Rams production going forward.

Christian I do not believe is anything more then a back up. Dude can't hit over .250 at AA.
Candi at A ball was over rated and is proving why.

Geiger IS the best 3B in the system and he is not even considered a prospect.

Go figure.

Continue to tell me why not extending A-Ram was a bright idea and show me the wonderful 3B replacement.

You are underselling Villanueva a bit. His defense is stellar and he projects to be a .260-.280 hitter with 15HR power. Also not ready to write off a 19 year old at A ball that has shown pretty good plate discipline. Geiger isn't a 3B as evident by his awful defensive metrics at the position.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,956
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
You are underselling Villanueva a bit. His defense is stellar and he projects to be a .260-.280 hitter with 15HR power. Also not ready to write off a 19 year old at A ball that has shown pretty good plate discipline. Geiger isn't a 3B as evident by his awful defensive metrics at the position.

Bad teams can not afford to place low producing players in premium hitting spots. Power at the corners D up the middle. Always some exceptions as you can go with a glove at a corner when one of the middle can do both. Produce and play D. Reason why I didn't agree with them tying up Castro and should have sold high. D sux and doesn't hit for power. Barney fits the D up the middle but the rest of the team is broken.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
There are your reading skills at its finest. Arms are very easy to acquire, the quality is the real question. Free Agency is packed full of both good decent and bad arms none the less there are far more to acquire then a power hitting first baseman.

You are dumb.

There are plenty of guys available in FA who put up league average numbers at 1b which is all Rizzo has done since joining the Cubs.

League average at best.
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
You are underselling Villanueva a bit. His defense is stellar and he projects to be a .260-.280 hitter with 15HR power. Also not ready to write off a 19 year old at A ball that has shown pretty good plate discipline. Geiger isn't a 3B as evident by his awful defensive metrics at the position.

Oh prospect :fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap:

Oh god, he is in the minor leagues :fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap::fap:

You have never said one bad thing about any minor league prospect and go on and on and on about how bad signing every quality proven major league player would be.

You cry about Villanueva is being undersold but went on and on and on about how bad Fielder will be in a couple years.

Flat out dumb.
 

kchicub08

New member
Joined:
May 20, 2013
Posts:
79
Liked Posts:
79
Get Dionner Navarro an infield mit...... Might have to put at 3b...lol
 

X

When one letter is enough
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
24,664
Liked Posts:
7,785
Out of curiosity, what do you all think the braintrust does w/ T.Wood and Feldman? I think we sell off Feldman, but may try to sign Wood to a 3-4 year deal. If we do want to extend Wood, I think negotiating before the end of the season would be a good idea...
 

KBisBack!

New member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
1,497
Liked Posts:
1,424
I think Feldman probably gets dealt and the return will be less than people think it will be.

I think it would be a mistake to extend Wood right now because I still don't think this is the true Travis Wood. He doesn't strike out a lot of hitters and I also think it is very unlikely he can sustain his low number of hits allowed. He is allow almost 2 hits less per 9 innings than his career totals while striking out .5 less batters per 9 innings as well. Those numbers don't seem sustainable to be both striking out less hitters and allowing less hits. His BAbip number is about 40 under his career numbers. I will be surprised if he ends the seasons with an ERA under 3.5

On a really quality staff he should be about a #4 starter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top