Bears agree with Steltz and McCray

pseudonym

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
6,671
Liked Posts:
4,049
Location:
Chicago
i know we have to go Donald at #14, but maybe we really do go safety in the 2nd AND 3rd now.
 

ijustposthere

Message Board Hero
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
33,374
Liked Posts:
27,841
Location:
Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Purdue Boilermakers
And people who likes Steltz and think he is a solid backup/ST player could say the same thing about the people who dont like him too much.

I'll tell you right now. He's not a solid backup nor solid ST player. That's my problem. He serves no decent purpose on this team.
 

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,241
Liked Posts:
7,739
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
I'll tell you right now. He's not a solid backup nor solid ST player. That's my problem. He serves no decent purpose on this team.

he is a nice guy in the locker room?

no...but seriously he has shown a nose for the ball. He scraps and is a good safety in the film room. He isn't that bad. I don't mind our depth chart right now if in training camp it looks like this....


1) Rookie first or second round pick
2) Mundy
3) Conte
4) Steltz vs an additional draft pick
5) long shot UFA or two


that is probably our best case scenario, and while still concerning there are at least potential answers
 

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,241
Liked Posts:
7,739
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
it's possible we could get Donald at #14 and still get Ward / Bucannon in the 2nd and Brooks in the 3rd. i'd be pretty okay with that.

very ok
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,856
Liked Posts:
10,180
"who are these fuckin' guys?" -Major League, 1989 (wrong sport, proper concept)
 

Top