- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,073
- Liked Posts:
- 12,197
- Location:
- Richmond, VA
My favorite teams
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/josh-gordon-and-the-nfls-drug-problem/
I thought I remember seeing a Josh Gordon thread, I searched but couldn't find it...Mods if I missed it can you merge please.
A couple highlights from the article:
While I may feel marijuana should be legalized and find it silly to suspend a player for a year over weed...Josh Gordon knew he what the consequences were and even if his second hand smoke claim is 100% true, he should have known better than to be in a situation that could have questioned whether he was breaking any NFL rules. Still a very dumb move by Gordon, but I do feel a year long ban over an inconclusive failed drug test is a bit much. And yes I know the year long ban is because this isn't the first time he failed a drug test but he didn't test for PED's which I would feel is a little more deserving of a year long suspension.
I thought I remember seeing a Josh Gordon thread, I searched but couldn't find it...Mods if I missed it can you merge please.
A couple highlights from the article:
But once you look at the details of the case, the questions get bigger than whether a wide receiver smoked weed. For instance: Why does this sport need to test people using a standard along the same lines as the U.S. military’s? Why is Josh Gordon treated like a paroled criminal for his entire career after testing positive twice? Do they really test him 10 times a month? Does it make sense to treat marijuana users the same way we treat PED users? Is there anyone at the NFL who saw the positive test and thought it might be too inconclusive to publicly ban a star player for an entire year? Does it make sense for the NFL to be testing players for marijuana at all? What does the league gain from prosecuting people like this?
Some of that’s genuine confusion from me, not just a bunch of rhetorical questions. My guess on the last one is that the NFL increases its control over players with testing like this — over what players do in their downtime, where they hang out, whom they associate with — and that kind of authority matters to owners. It reminds the players that they’re employees of the NFL, and that playing this sport is a privilege, not a right. It has to be something like that.
It can’t possibly be that the league is so concerned with marijuana that it thinks it’s smart to fight public battles against star players over it. Marijuana isn’t a player safety concern; marijuana isn’t a public safety concern. There’s plenty of evidence that it’s actually healthier than a lot of the painkillers players ingest every week.
While I may feel marijuana should be legalized and find it silly to suspend a player for a year over weed...Josh Gordon knew he what the consequences were and even if his second hand smoke claim is 100% true, he should have known better than to be in a situation that could have questioned whether he was breaking any NFL rules. Still a very dumb move by Gordon, but I do feel a year long ban over an inconclusive failed drug test is a bit much. And yes I know the year long ban is because this isn't the first time he failed a drug test but he didn't test for PED's which I would feel is a little more deserving of a year long suspension.