Welp, Notre Dame just got fucked by the refs..

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
44,439
Liked Posts:
38,983
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
You say that like its no big deal. They would have had 3 shots at the endzone from the 8.5 yard line.

No, I say that as a guy who did not see the game. Only the replay in question.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,163
If their arms didn't lock up with the DBs they would have gotten away with it.
You're blind.

B0R_xSPIEAAOkDD.jpg

B0SLefbIAAEBAlK.jpg:large


There's Prosise "engaged"..his arms are at his side. He's clearly being held.

Fuller ran into Darby bc Darby was standing there like an idiot.

The sum of that play is the officials missed two obvious penalties on FSU and called a questionable call on ND.

That would have just most likely offset the pass interference calll. It may have helped ND, may have not.
:obama: I would think a first and goal from the 8 would have helped a lot rather than being 4th and goal from the 18.
No, I say that as a guy who did not see the game. Only the replay in question.
You didn't view the play very well.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,790
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
You're blind.

B0R_xSPIEAAOkDD.jpg

B0SLefbIAAEBAlK.jpg:large


There's Prosise "engaged"..his arms are at his side. He's clearly being held.

Fuller ran into Darby bc Darby was standing there like an idiot.

The sum of that play is the officials missed two obvious penalties on FSU and called a questionable call on ND.


:obama: I would think a first and goal from the 8 would have helped a lot rather than being 4th and goal from the 18.

You didn't view the play very well.

It is very clear you do not know what pass interference is on the offensive side. Sad that you can't seem to grasp that. You pictures do nothing but prove my point. Guess the rule explanation went over your head too smh.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,163
It is very clear you do not know what pass interference is on the offensive side.

:obama:

What I've just shown you is defensive holding. Even if you want to say Fuller committed OPI the refs still missed two penalties on FSU on that one play. The defensive holding offsets the OPI, the FSU player removing his helmet gives ND 1st and Goal at the 8 yard line.

What's your point?
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,790
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
:obama:

What I've just shown you is defensive holding. Even if you want to say Fuller committed OPI the refs still missed two penalties on FSU on that one play. The defensive holding offsets the OPI, the FSU player removing his helmet gives ND 1st and Goal at the 8 yard line.

What's your point?

Didn't see the player take off his helmet.

The receiver didn't try to fight off whether he was held or since it was an obvious pick play. When two players are engaged there is going to be holding on both parts. If anything no flag.

Now I would not have called the penalty because FSU gave up on the play because they left open and they also didn't fight off. But I can understand why it was called.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,163
Didn't see the player take off his helmet.
mc3-1024x550.png


The receiver didn't try to fight off whether he was held or since it was an obvious pick play.
Not what the play calls for Prosise to do. He was held.


When two players are engaged there is going to be holding on both parts.
I just showed you two pictures with the ND players hands down by his side.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,790
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
mc3-1024x550.png



Not what the play calls for Prosise to do. He was held.

Apparently because he did


I just showed you two pictures with the ND players hands down by his side.

Those pictures didn't show the whole play


[video=youtube;vlX8EhpzwO4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlX8EhpzwO4[/video]
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,163
Those pictures didn't show the whole play


[video=youtube;vlX8EhpzwO4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlX8EhpzwO4[/video]
Yep and he's still clearly being held. Thanks.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
44,439
Liked Posts:
38,983
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Video confirms my suspicion that the penalty should have been called on #7.
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,790
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
LOL. ACC confirmed they called it on #20

Are you blind? The ACC confirmed they called it on #20.

No you are and obnoxiously can't read. Both receivers interfered. But your are taking about defensive holding lol
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
33,974
Liked Posts:
34,024
Location:
Cumming
First Timer, its no big deal. Once Notre Dame runs the table and FSU loses to Louisville, Notre Dame will be in the playoff and FSU wont.
This bullshit OPI won't matter by then. When that happens, FSU fans will be crying like the girl Jameis raped.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,163
Those pictures didn't show it. The video proved my point.

The video doesn't prove your point because it's just moving pictures of Prosise getting held.
 

Top