[A] Player Evaluation: Marcus Kruger

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
After entering his first full season last year, Marcus Kruger has been somewhat of an enigma. In his rookie year, Kruger tallied 9 goals and 17 assists for a total of 26 points and a plus-11 in 71 games. His production helped him finish 11th in rookie scoring, keeping him slightly behind a highly touted prospect in Sean Couturier and ahead of alleged blue chip prospects such as Brayden Schenn and Brett Connolly.



Kruger saw his ice-time allocated anywhere between the 2nd and 4th line, as well as earning ample opportunities on the penalty-kill and the power-play. He's a good two-way player that has a good read on the play. He isn't necessarily eye-popping because he sticks to meat and potatoes hockey, and that is why Joel Quenneville isn't afraid to utilize him in all game situations.



However, at 22 years old, he's far from perfect. His face-off percentage needs to improve, he needs to get stronger on the puck, and he needs to provide more desperation and hunger for the puck offensively on a more consistent basis. He's a little bit undersized for the center position at this point in his career, but he's got a low center of gravity and if he adds some weight he could be hard to knock off the puck. He started to pick up his game towards the end of the season which is a great sign for him moving forward.



After the Blackhawks were eliminated by the Phoenix Coyotes, Kruger dressed for Sweden in the World Championships and had 5 points in 8 games of the tournament -- two of his goals were game winners. Sweden didn't win anything, but it's encouraging to know he had a productive tournament.



[float='left']Related Content



Player Evaluation: Sheldon Brookbank

Ton takes a look at Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Sheldon Brookbank



Player Evaluation: Corey Crawford

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DiCarlo takes a look at the Chicago Blackhawks goaltender Corey Crawford[/font]



Player Evaluation: Michael Frolik

DiCarlo discusses what's in store for Blackhawks forward Michael Frolik



Player Evaluation: Steve Montador

Ton gives his take on Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Steve Montador

[/float]RAISING THE BAR



So what should we expect for Kruger this upcoming season? First off, I think he'll be given every opportunity to fill the center void on the 2nd line and if he can gain some traction on a productive line I don't see any reason why he can't improve on his 26 point rookie season unless someone like Brandon Pirri proves to be more effective and steals his job. At this point there is no indication that the Blackhawks are ready to go that direction so we'll have to assume that Kruger will be in the line-up every night. Other than that, his face-off numbers have to improve and he simply needs to get stronger and build on his 6' 0" frame.



In addition to his physical attributes, I'd like to see more on where he stands mentally. Overall Kruger is a quiet player, he doesn't really get caught up in the media hype and keeps to himself. I don't really expect him to flaunt a shining personality when he's interviewed, but I'd like to see a bit more from him in terms of character and less of the answers he learned in media class. Maybe it's just me, or maybe that's just the type of person he is and he is truly focused on the game, (I get the feeling he's more timid due to the spotlight than focused at times) but it's nice to see the fire every now and then.



I think at times people expected more out of Kruger because they just didn't realize that he was a rookie last season. However, his development has been pretty steady and he improved throughout the year. I think it's just a matter of being patient and recognizing that not everyone is a Jonathan Toews or Patrick Kane as far as producing offense right away. Look at the Detroit Red Wings model and check out Valtteri Filppula. His career has seen a fairly steady upward trend in terms of production and he is among the countless of other players they've developed on their roster that have followed a similar path. If that is any indication of how Kruger is developing, then he'll be fine. The production will come, until then he is more than capable of holding the fort.



*Check out Johan Franzen, Jiri Hudler, and Pavel Datsyuk for more examples of improvement in production. For examples on the Blackhawks, check out Viktor Stalberg, Patrick Sharp, and Duncan Keith.



PREDICTION: 78 GAMES | 12 GOALS | 24 ASSISTS | 36 POINTS | PLUS-14



Click here to view the article
 

sniper

New member
Joined:
Jul 3, 2012
Posts:
29
Liked Posts:
0
you make some good points but id prefer the center position on the 2nd line to be filled with someone that has experience. i dont trust kruger to produce enough but maybe with confidence he will do fine. he is a good twoway player though and wouldnt exactly hurt hossa/sharps production. 36 pts would be a good improvement but not enough for a number two center. i just dont see where he fits in this lineup i think its worth giving pirri a shot if kruger cant cut it midway in the season.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
you make some good points but id prefer the center position on the 2nd line to be filled with someone that has experience. i dont trust kruger to produce enough but maybe with confidence he will do fine. he is a good twoway player though and wouldnt exactly hurt hossa/sharps production. 36 pts would be a good improvement but not enough for a number two center. i just dont see where he fits in this lineup i think its worth giving pirri a shot if kruger cant cut it midway in the season.
36 points between 2 all stars is quite low, but with Q and his line juggling, I think its a fair number.



One thing that stands out to me about Kruger is he's nog afraid to go to the dirty areas on the ice. I remember times watching games and the only forward outside of Toews to sit in front of the net and take a beating was the under sized Kruger.



I could see him topping out as a 2nd line forward in the mold of a Sykora or less flashy Saku koivu.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
Honestly I haven't seen enough of Kruger to really predict anything going forward. Going to need another season to get a better glimpse into his overall game. However as we all know he needs to work on his skating and is why I like others thought he would have been better off with a year on the farm. If he goes into another season without improving his skating it's a joke he plays 2nd line center minutes. HE NEEDS TO IMPROVE HIS SKATING.



He's a Bowman guy through and through and it's not surprising that he got and will get the chances to prove himself. No doubt in my mind either that Q has had very little call on where Kruger plays and why he wasn't in the AHL. Bowmans got his fingers all over Kruger and the decisions made with him. Yah I said it....and I mean it.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Honestly I haven't seen enough of Kruger to really predict anything going forward. Going to need another season to get a better glimpse into his overall game. However as we all know he needs to work on his skating and is why I like others thought he would have been better off with a year on the farm. If he goes into another season without improving his skating it's a joke he plays 2nd line center minutes. HE NEEDS TO IMPROVE HIS SKATING.



He's a Bowman guy through and through and it's not surprising that he got and will get the chances to prove himself. No doubt in my mind either that Q has had very little call on where Kruger plays and why he wasn't in the AHL. Bowmans got his fingers all over Kruger and the decisions made with him. Yah I said it....and I mean it.



I disagree, I think Kruger is a players coach. From what I've seen, Q seems pretty happy with having a player like Kruger on his roster. Not saying he's a 2nd line center but he does everything that is asked of him and plays within the system.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
I disagree, I think Kruger is a players coach. From what I've seen, Q seems pretty happy with having a player like Kruger on his roster. Not saying he's a 2nd line center but he does everything that is asked of him and plays within the system.



Oh I don't deny that. I def see him as a team player and every coach loves that. What I mean is Kruger could be Stans little found gem which could elevate his GM status. I really believe he has had a lot to say about Krugers minutes last season. I don't dislike Kruger but I don't see how he deserved the minutes he got besides the lack of center of course. Bolland deserved a much better look as a 2nd liner than he received. And I know Bolland is built for the 3rd but that 3rd line just did not function last season and when a change was needed by putting Bolland on the 2nd? Didn't happen. I really don't think it was all Q with those decisions.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I disagree, I think Kruger is a players coach. From what I've seen, Q seems pretty happy with having a player like Kruger on his roster. Not saying he's a 2nd line center but he does everything that is asked of him and plays within the system.

A Coaches player...dumb ass
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I disagree, I think Kruger is a players coach. From what I've seen, Q seems pretty happy with having a player like Kruger on his roster. Not saying he's a 2nd line center but he does everything that is asked of him and plays within the system.



Q loved Walker too though.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Kruger was among the many assigned to Rockford today... again, no surprise there.
 

Top