Corey Crawford Appreciation Thread

sth

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
2,851
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Billings, Montana
Very nice return from injury for Corey. That no shutout thing was silly. But now that he has two, even that has been defanged. Not that Emery hasn't been great too, he has. But I'm glad I never gave up on Corey.
 
PatrickShart

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
I'm glad I never gave up on him either



After the pathetic display of goaltending the Hawks had last year, it's good to see him and Emery both rebound to give them a well above average net prescence
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
I bitched about Crow last year I admit it but I always said this year was his put up or shut up year. He put up thus far. Emery, I never thought Emery was bad last year. Frankly I was surprised he resigned, I felt he played good enough to compete for a starting job on a team in need of goaltending. So it tells me Emery is happy with this gig. So right now goaltending in Chicago is solid as a rock. Although I still miss Niemi just because his style was more entertaining than Crow. It is pure entertainment factor.
 
MassHavoc

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,580
Liked Posts:
2,628
They should trade him now for Niemi......
 
Chief Walking Stick

Chief Walking Stick

Heeeh heeeeh he said POLES
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
45,683
Liked Posts:
29,818
Crawford with his 3rd shutout of the season when he only played 1 period.



Monster.
 
MassHavoc

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,580
Liked Posts:
2,628
so why does he get the shutout? what's the rule. or logic? because he started and didn't give up a goal before leaving?
 
Chief Walking Stick

Chief Walking Stick

Heeeh heeeeh he said POLES
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
45,683
Liked Posts:
29,818
MassHavoc said:
so why does he get the shutout? what's the rule. or logic? because he started and didn't give up a goal before leaving?
Click to expand...



He was winning when he left/was taken out. He also had a shutout at the same point.



W and SO go to Craw,
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
You're wrong Grimson. The W goes to Crawford but the SO goes to neither Crawford nor Emery. It is considered a "team" shutout or "bench".
 

PatrickSharpRules

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
1,986
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Southside, Chicago
Grimson said:
'



thats stupid



and so are you
Click to expand...



You are wrong Stu, Yahoo has the shutout scored to nobody. Just traded for Crawford this week in fantasy and did not get the always valuable shutout.



Both have 1.000 SV% and 0.00 GAA, both also got credit for the W, but neither the shutout.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
PSR said:
You are wrong Stu, Yahoo has the shutout scored to nobody. Just traded for Crawford this week in fantasy and did not get the always valuable shutout.



Both have 1.000 SV% and 0.00 GAA, both also got credit for the W, but neither the shutout.
Click to expand...



yah I noticed that too when i checked my fantasy points. Apparently its registered as a "team shut out". Honestly how often does something like this happen. I really think it's the first time I have seen it happen, I can't think of another time. Of course im sure it has happened in the past I just never really paid attention to it. Its def a rare hockey moment. Why am I not surprised it happened with the Hawks this season?
 

PatrickSharpRules

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
1,986
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Southside, Chicago
the canadian dream said:
yah I noticed that too when i checked my fantasy points. Apparently its registered as a "team shut out". Honestly how often does something like this happen. I really think it's the first time I have seen it happen, I can't think of another time. Of course im sure it has happened in the past I just never really paid attention to it. Its def a rare hockey moment. Why am I not surprised it happened with the Hawks this season?
Click to expand...



Happened last year with the Wings, I had Howard and he had to leave the game. He had logged more TOI than the backup MacDonald but they never gave either the shutout.



Guess we'd be more familiar if the 3 shutouts this year didn't equal the entire prior 10 years for the Hawks.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
PSR said:
Happened last year with the Wings, I had Howard and he had to leave the game. He had logged more TOI than the backup MacDonald but they never gave either the shutout.



Guess we'd be more familiar if the 3 shutouts this year didn't equal the entire prior 10 years for the Hawks.
Click to expand...
PSR said:
Happened last year with the Wings, I had Howard and he had to leave the game. He had logged more TOI than the backup MacDonald but they never gave either the shutout.



Guess we'd be more familiar if the 3 shutouts this year didn't equal the entire prior 10 years for the Hawks.
Click to expand...



hahahahaha indeed!!!



it makes sense i guess. I mean you wouldn't give the starting pitcher and the reliever both a perfect game if it happened in baseball. Having to play the entire game for those stats makes sense. But I'll never be able to wrap my head around Craw getting the win tonight and not Emery. Ill certainly take it for fantasy points also but just seems like an odd rule in hockey. Guy icing the most minutes in my opinion should get the win stat.



No big deal anyways the team W is the most important.
 
MassHavoc

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,580
Liked Posts:
2,628
Wait.... they were both credited with a win?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,881members
93,081threads
4,375,403posts
678online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 678 (members: 41, guests: 637)
Top