Defensive Depth (Update: Clendening traded for Vancouver prospect Gustav Forsling

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,654
they have a better chance at turning Brad Richards into the team enforcer.

I'd be happy if they just turned him into someone that occasionally finishes a check.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
Well they just traded Clendening for an 18year old Swedish Defensivemen(shocked) but what is shocking is that it seems like awful return value if it's just straight up player for player.
 

biscuit_in_the_basket

Gigacore Fan!
Joined:
Jan 25, 2015
Posts:
495
Liked Posts:
240
Location:
200 Level
Well they just traded Clendening for an 18year old Swedish Defensivemen(shocked) but what is shocking is that it seems like awful return value if it's just straight up player for player.


Yea I just saw that tweet. Not sure about the trade just yet, but interesting. Maybe Stan is building a complete team of Swedes around Toews, Kane, and Keith. Crawford will be traded for MAF..book it!
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,108
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I texted that to a close friend (die hard Canucks fan) and he was mad because apparently Forsling was their best D prospect.


neither could hit, but I liked Clandening. Seems like all of our good defensemen go to Vancouver.
 

Pez68

Fire Quenneville
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
4,693
Liked Posts:
260
I texted that to a close friend (die hard Canucks fan) and he was mad because apparently Forsling was their best D prospect.


neither could hit, but I liked Clandening. Seems like all of our good defensemen go to Vancouver.

Such as......who?
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I'm shocked we trade Clendening who seemed to be not that far off from playing for a spot.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
Don't really get this trade. They aren't going to need d-men later on down the road, they're going to need them next season. Hell, they need one this season.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Thing is, would he have been able to get a full-time stop here?

Having great defensive depth is a luxury in the NHL and we've got it well. In short, I think acquiring Forsling helps this out, as I don't think Clendening would have made the roster at all until likely next season.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Word on the street is the Hawks weren't sure Clendening could compete as a top 4 defensemen. Plus the Hawks view TVR, Runblad, Johns, Pokka, and Dahlbeck all a head of him.




Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I'm also not 100% sold on TVR. When he played, I didn't think he was really that good, nor really that bad. I guess just being average as a 3rd pairing is fine, but I don't see what all the fuss was.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

winos5

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 19, 2013
Posts:
7,956
Liked Posts:
829
Location:
Wish You Were Here
So Clendening will get a shot at cracking an NHL line-up and we get someone to develop? Doesn't seem like a wash to me. Time will tell.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
So Clendening will get a shot at cracking an NHL line-up and we get someone to develop? Doesn't seem like a wash to me. Time will tell.

It's also a waiver related move. If Clendening gets called up at any point next season (which he more than likely would during training camp) he would need to pass through waivers if he were to get sent back down, which we would get nothing for. At this point, we get an 18 year old prospect who has 4+ years a head of him for development that the Hawks won't have to worry about.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Word on the street is the Hawks weren't sure Clendening could compete as a top 4 defensemen. Plus the Hawks view TVR, Runblad, Johns, Pokka, and Dahlbeck all a head of him.

Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

According to what I've been reading on Twitter, all three of those players had surpassed Clendening on the depth chart in Rockford. Pokka, especially, has been impressing with his play of late.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
Don't really get this trade. They aren't going to need d-men later on down the road, they're going to need them next season. Hell, they need one this season.

That's not really true, they have 5 young D-men that are basically able to play next season for some NHL time. Out of all of them, which one is it likely the coach doesn't like most. The purest offensive D-man of the group and that's Clendening. He doesn't really have the best chance out of multiple guys fighting for next years D spots. Sure if they could of somehow got Ryan Stanton back he'd help be a now depth option to play but it's not easy to fit a new player onto the Hawks cap.

Supposedly Gustav is also an offensive leaning guy. But he's only 18, and Swedish which in itself is a positive attribute in the eyes of Stan it appears. It's essentially an age swap, initially it seemed off putting from him just being a 5th round pick but his WJC performance boosted his reputation and developing expectations.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
Don't really get this trade. They aren't going to need d-men later on down the road, they're going to need them next season. Hell, they need one this season.

1) That wasn't going to be Clandening
2) We weren't going to get a top 4 defensemen for Clandening.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
That's not really true, they have 5 young D-men that are basically able to play next season for some NHL time. Out of all of them, which one is it likely the coach doesn't like most. The purest offensive D-man of the group and that's Clendening. He doesn't really have the best chance out of multiple guys fighting for next years D spots. Sure if they could of somehow got Ryan Stanton back he'd help be a now depth option to play but it's not easy to fit a new player onto the Hawks cap.

Supposedly Gustav is also an offensive leaning guy. But he's only 18, and Swedish which in itself is a positive attribute in the eyes of Stan it appears. It's essentially an age swap, initially it seemed off putting from him just being a 5th round pick but his WJC performance boosted his reputation and developing expectations.

Sweden has been phenomenal in developing hockey players due to their development model. You don't see many coming from there with out a good solid structure on the 5 major hockey skills. Despite being an offensively labeled defensemen, I'm sure his defensive side is pretty good.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,233
Liked Posts:
6,640
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Watching some U-tube clips of Forsling and he appears to be a prototypical Blackhawk dman....can skate, decent stickwork, can handle the puck but doesn't hit much. His strong suit looks to be on the PP...big shot, with great timing on one timers from the point. Off the clips I saw, he has a bit more upside than Clendening.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Hawks must of seen something they liked as he plays on the same team as 2013 #2nd rounder Carl Dahlstrom.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Top