dabears70
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 31, 2013
- Posts:
- 33,925
- Liked Posts:
- -987
- Location:
- Orlando
My favorite teams
That's gotta be the dumbest shit i've ever seen...........you being from Any-Town,USA....geesh.
That's gotta be the dumbest shit i've ever seen...........you being from Any-Town,USA....geesh.
BearDen
High Ranking Member
- Joined:
- May 18, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,730
- Liked Posts:
- 4,511
I believe you just got trolled, sir.
Bears4Ever_34
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,530
- Liked Posts:
- 10,013
Wtf? He should be at LT, not wasted on the right side. He's the best athlete on the offensive line.
Bearshomer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,517
- Liked Posts:
- 1,502
I'm guessing that it is because he has played all three interior positions, comes cheap, and is well liked in the organization. That and he was injured in the first game last year, which could have effected his play.
I would have let him walk, but that might be what the Bears are thinking.
The Hawk
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2014
- Posts:
- 18,007
- Liked Posts:
- 1,682
- Location:
- Southern California
My favorite teams
Garz has got to go. Long had to work triple time last year trying to cover for both Garza and Mills or whoever they put next to him at RT.
TheDane
New member
- Joined:
- Jan 9, 2014
- Posts:
- 1,129
- Liked Posts:
- 632
- Location:
- Denmark
No, Garza didn't have a great year. Nobody said he did. But why would you cut a guy right now without having a realistic replacement? And why not keep him until training camp? He's a great mentor, and by keeping him around to compete in training camp, we could squeeze the last bit of mentorship and leadership out of him. If he doesn't do enough on the field in training camp to earn a roster spot, THEN cut him.
