Would the board be pleased with/ this:

ryneteem23

Member
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
139
Liked Posts:
49
1. Kevin White: WR
2. Byron Jones: CB/S
3. Garrett Grayson: QB
4. Xavier Cooper: DT (5 tech)
5. Max Garcia: C
6. Lynden Trail: DE

I think this would be a solid draft class
 

Omeletpants

Save America
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,619
Liked Posts:
-1,619
My favorite teams
  1. Colorado Rockies
  1. Atlanta United FC
  1. Los Angeles Lakers
  2. Orlando Magic
  3. Phoenix Suns
  4. Sacramento Kings
  1. Columbus Blue Jackets
Cause our run defense is so good that we dont need a DT/NT until the 4th round
 

CanadianBears

New member
Joined:
Nov 5, 2012
Posts:
17
Liked Posts:
2
Yeah because our wideouts, corners and quarterback are so good we don't even need to sweat them either... Good response...

We have so many holes in the team the Bears can go any direction BPA dictates.
 

truthbedamned

I don't have a party
Donator
Joined:
Aug 31, 2014
Posts:
15,362
Liked Posts:
10,517
Location:
Socialist Republic of California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
No.....
 

Omeletpants

Save America
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,619
Liked Posts:
-1,619
My favorite teams
  1. Colorado Rockies
  1. Atlanta United FC
  1. Los Angeles Lakers
  2. Orlando Magic
  3. Phoenix Suns
  4. Sacramento Kings
  1. Columbus Blue Jackets
Yeah because our wideouts, corners and quarterback are so good we don't even need to sweat them either... Good response...

We have so many holes in the team the Bears can go any direction BPA dictates.
Nonsense. Possibly the worst defensive front 7 in the NFL last year doesnt need a DL till the 4th round, especially as we transition to the 3-4
 

strobiwan

Active member
Joined:
May 27, 2014
Posts:
464
Liked Posts:
213
Location:
lakeview
Nonsense. Possibly the worst defensive front 7 in the NFL last year doesnt need a DL till the 4th round, especially as we transition to the 3-4

but we signed a bunch of 1 year prove it guys, that nobody else wanted. don't you know that equals a fixed defense?????
but yeah lets draft a WR in the 1st, so we can be the Jags of the north.
 
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
189
Liked Posts:
79
Location:
Seattle
Yeah because our wideouts, corners and quarterback are so good we don't even need to sweat them either... Good response...

We have so many holes in the team the Bears can go any direction BPA dictates.

Don't worry about that dude, he hasn't ever liked a single thing proposed on this forum. I think he's a Jets fan that trolls the board and only seems content when the Bears suck. I'm surprised he didn't at least give you props for not reading down though.
 

ryneteem23

Member
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
139
Liked Posts:
49
Mario Edwards could be an option in the second round...Omelet Pants posts are irrelevant to anything discussed here
 

Xplosive

In the Land of the Blind the One Eyed Fan Is Neggd
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
4,238
Liked Posts:
1,749
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
1. Kevin White: WR
2. Byron Jones: CB/S
3. Garrett Grayson: QB
4. Xavier Cooper: DT (5 tech)
5. Max Garcia: C
6. Lynden Trail: DE

I think this would be a solid draft class
You're wasting your time if you think a world record setting DB with great size and speed is going to slip to the second round.
 
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
189
Liked Posts:
79
Location:
Seattle
We have alshon and royal.
we don't NEED another WR.

Yes. Yes we do. It might not be the top need on our ball club, but Royal is our slot and Marquess is unproven. Also, injuries happen. Lastly, AJ *might* not resign with us.
 

strobiwan

Active member
Joined:
May 27, 2014
Posts:
464
Liked Posts:
213
Location:
lakeview
yep every team needs 2 probowl WR's to be successful.......lol
 
Joined:
Mar 12, 2013
Posts:
189
Liked Posts:
79
Location:
Seattle
yep every team needs 2 probowl WR's to be successful.......lol

? What... Pretty sure I didn't say that. Nor am I saying we have to take a WR at 7. Glad to see your snarkiness is matched by your inability to read or, for that matter, think. Carry on...
 

gallagher

Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
6,360
Liked Posts:
5,608
Location:
Semi-Nomadic
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
Yes. Yes we do. It might not be the top need on our ball club, but Royal is our slot and Marquess is unproven. Also, injuries happen. Lastly, AJ *might* not resign with us.

That is called desire, not need. We have enough receiving options that we can wait until later in the draft to grab more competition. We may finally have coaches that can return our defense to glory, but they are tasked with fixing a historically bad unit. At the very least, our first pick should be on a guy who can start day one on this defense
 

strobiwan

Active member
Joined:
May 27, 2014
Posts:
464
Liked Posts:
213
Location:
lakeview
? What... Pretty sure I didn't say that. Nor am I saying we have to take a WR at 7. Glad to see your snarkiness is matched by your inability to read or, for that matter, think. Carry on...

my bad. I thought you were implying that we need a WR at 7
 

JIMMY MAC FAN

New member
Joined:
Jan 25, 2014
Posts:
310
Liked Posts:
159
That is called desire, not need. We have enough receiving options that we can wait until later in the draft to grab more competition. We may finally have coaches that can return our defense to glory, but they are tasked with fixing a historically bad unit. At the very least, our first pick should be on a guy who can start day one on this defense

You take BPA that high in the draft. If it is a WR, so be it.
 

Top