If you could take any player

PrideisBears

PrideisBears

Bully Mod
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
38,267
Liked Posts:
32,919
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
Johnny said:
Fucking gay
Click to expand...

Im sure you have a reason or are you still waiting to copy one from the folks you follow here. Everyone was going to say QB, so I went with the current best RB. Why so much butthurt?
 
Hbkrusso

Hbkrusso

Objective Fanboy
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
17,627
Liked Posts:
13,260
Location:
wv
bearmick said:
Yes because Rodgers is better than Luck.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I don't think he is by a whole lot and your gonna get 10 more years or more out of luck be lucky to get 5 outta rodgers
 
bearmick

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,895
Liked Posts:
43,086
Hbkrusso said:
I don't think he is by a whole lot and your gonna get 10 more years or more out of luck be lucky to get 5 outta rodgers
Click to expand...

Well when you asked who I'd take if I could have any player in the league, I assumed you meant to help a team win now. I didn't realize we were talking about a 6+ year rebuilding process. So if I'm being asked who I want on my team to help me win, my answer is going to be the best player at the most important position on the field. And right now that's Rodgers. And I don't think it's all that close. Luck is great and can get the offense down the field but Rodgers is just in a league by himself.
 
Hbkrusso

Hbkrusso

Objective Fanboy
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
17,627
Liked Posts:
13,260
Location:
wv
bearmick said:
Well when you asked who I'd take if I could have any player in the league, I assumed you meant to help a team win now. I didn't realize we were talking about a 6+ year rebuilding process. So if I'm being asked who I want on my team to help me win, my answer is going to be the best player at the most important position on the field. And right now that's Rodgers. And I don't think it's all that close. Luck is great and can get the offense down the field but Rodgers is just in a league by himself.
Click to expand...

I agree Rodgers is most likely the best in the game atm so if it was win now I can see where your coming from there but in the win now scenario for the bears id prolly look for a stud defensive leader for the bears
 
SlickWilly

SlickWilly

Team Ignore Member #2
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2013
Posts:
5,053
Liked Posts:
4,495
Location:
Dakotaland
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. Detroit Pistons
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. North Carolina Tar Heels
Hbkrusso said:
I agree Rodgers is most likely the best in the game atm so if it was win now I can see where your coming from there but in the win now scenario for the bears id prolly look for a stud defensive leader for the bears
Click to expand...

Rodgers gets us a lot closer to winning a SB than JJ Watt does. Taking Rodgers also gets rid of the turnover prone QB we have now.
 
botfly10

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,872
Liked Posts:
26,846
With Luck, there is still a little bit of gamble. Yeah, the payoff is a lot more time with him.

But Rodgers is proven. The way he has cycled through WRs, shitty OL's, shitty D's, dude has always held up his end.
 
Warrior Spirit

Warrior Spirit

The Truth
Donator
Joined:
Sep 12, 2010
Posts:
41,571
Liked Posts:
13,618
I'd say QB is the key position and Rodgers is the very best. You should have made this more challenging, HBGay
 
Escobar's Army

Escobar's Army

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 14, 2013
Posts:
2,587
Liked Posts:
1,370
You have to go QB in today's NFL. Luck is the obvious choice, but I'd go Rodgers for just one year as well.
 
botfly10

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,872
Liked Posts:
26,846
People know Rodgers is only 31 right?

I mean shit,

Drew Brees is 36
Brady is 37
Manning is 39
Favre retired at 41

Its depressing as fuck, but Rodgers is gon be around for a lot more years.
 
Last edited:
nc0gnet0

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
17,576
Liked Posts:
3,584
Escobar's Army said:
You have to go QB in today's NFL. Luck is the obvious choice, but I'd go Rodgers for just one year as well.
Click to expand...

If anyone were to choose Luck, we would still have to play GB with an Aaron Rodgers lead offense for the next 6+ years.

The choice is obvious, you take Rodgers, immediately pick up two conference wins against a Rodgers less GB, and your in the playoffs for at least the next 6+ years. The answer to this question is so blatantly obvious it isn't funny.

As much as I like J.J. Watt, choosing him, or any defensive player for that matter, would be ridiculous within the context of how the question was asked. It would make for a better question if the OP would have allowed us to pick two players, one offensive and one defensive.
 
Bearly

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
41,295
Liked Posts:
23,610
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
bearmick said:
Well when you asked who I'd take if I could have any player in the league, I assumed you meant to help a team win now. I didn't realize we were talking about a 6+ year rebuilding process. So if I'm being asked who I want on my team to help me win, my answer is going to be the best player at the most important position on the field. And right now that's Rodgers. And I don't think it's all that close. Luck is great and can get the offense down the field but Rodgers is just in a league by himself.
Click to expand...

This and these convos should always refer to one contract cycle which Rodgers can still fulfill.
 
iueyedoc

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
20,787
Liked Posts:
29,507
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
botfly10 said:
With Luck, there is still a little bit of gamble. Yeah, the payoff is a lot more time with him.

But Rodgers is proven. The way he has cycled through WRs, shitty OL's, shitty D's, dude has always held up his end.
Click to expand...
I see what you did there.:lol:
 
Raskolnikov

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,241
Liked Posts:
7,739
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
its funny cuz when you say the gay guy you all mean the one 2 hours north dating a fox and not the one dating a tranny
 
1COBearsfan

1COBearsfan

Equinsu ocha
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,503
Liked Posts:
1,875
Location:
Denver, Co
Pegger said:
I would love to see Rodgers be in a Bears uni. The haters would slowly turn from being jaded, closet homophobes to his biggest fan. It would be extremely comical from an outsiders point of view.
Click to expand...

It would be comical from an insiders view as well
 
1COBearsfan

1COBearsfan

Equinsu ocha
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,503
Liked Posts:
1,875
Location:
Denver, Co
We could pick up Rodgers and keep Jay as a backup. Then Jay could finally get some love from the fans
 
1COBearsfan

1COBearsfan

Equinsu ocha
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
3,503
Liked Posts:
1,875
Location:
Denver, Co
nc0gnet0 said:
Shit, I was hoping we could ship Jay to GB, another win for the bears!
Click to expand...

As much as I love Jay, the gb roster and Jay vs our roster and Rodgers would be otherworldly unfair
 
Raskolnikov

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,241
Liked Posts:
7,739
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
nc0gnet0 said:
If anyone were to choose Luck, we would still have to play GB with an Aaron Rodgers lead offense for the next 6+ years.

The choice is obvious, you take Rodgers, immediately pick up two conference wins against a Rodgers less GB, and your in the playoffs for at least the next 6+ years. The answer to this question is so blatantly obvious it isn't funny.

As much as I like J.J. Watt, choosing him, or any defensive player for that matter, would be ridiculous within the context of how the question was asked. It would make for a better question if the OP would have allowed us to pick two players, one offensive and one defensive.
Click to expand...

How is that more challenging? Is someone taking Von Miller over Watt? Revis island?

Watt is so far above normal its not challenging either.
 
Raskolnikov

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,241
Liked Posts:
7,739
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
nc0gnet0 said:
If anyone were to choose Luck, we would still have to play GB with an Aaron Rodgers lead offense for the next 6+ years.

The choice is obvious, you take Rodgers, immediately pick up two conference wins against a Rodgers less GB, and your in the playoffs for at least the next 6+ years. The answer to this question is so blatantly obvious it isn't funny.

As much as I like J.J. Watt, choosing him, or any defensive player for that matter, would be ridiculous within the context of how the question was asked. It would make for a better question if the OP would have allowed us to pick two players, one offensive and one defensive.
Click to expand...

How is that more challenging? Is someone taking Von Miller over Watt? Revis island?

Watt is so far above normal its not challenging either.
 
Hbkrusso

Hbkrusso

Objective Fanboy
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
17,627
Liked Posts:
13,260
Location:
wv
Raskolnikov said:
How is that more challenging? Is someone taking Von Miller over Watt? Revis island?

Watt is so far above normal its not challenging either.
Click to expand...

watt is fucking ridiculous for sure that dudes in a league of his own if he doesn't end up a first ballot hof'er I dunno who the fuck would be
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,879members
92,988threads
4,371,805posts
529online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 529 (members: 12, guests: 517)

Staff online NOW

Top