TheRivalry
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 1, 2012
- Posts:
- 303
- Liked Posts:
- 72
yep
The REAL reason why Da Bears will beat the packers at soldier field...
- Thread starter SouthSida773
- Start date
- Status
yep
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,819
- Liked Posts:
- 3,527
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,819
- Liked Posts:
- 3,527
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
Sooooo.....again changing the topic to what may be more relevant instead of addressing the issue and facts at hand. You are just too much of a homer. Sad really. Newsflash...the Bears haven't been a winning team for a bit now so tell me what the relevance is again when Rodgers loses to winning away teams???
anyways....survey says...look at that cool chart and accept it instead of babbling
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
Are you really still stewing from the thread where the whole board was laughing at another one of your ridiculous posts that you have resorted to straight up lying now? Lmao Please find me one post where I blame the D on Cutler's bad play.
You are a pretty sad individual to even attempt such a fabricated post but luckily it can just as easily expose what an ass you are. Thank you:yep:
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 12,071
- Liked Posts:
- 12,185
- Location:
- Richmond, VA
My favorite teams
Sooooo.....again changing the topic to what may be more relevant instead of addressing the issue and facts at hand. You are just too much of a homer. Sad really. Newsflash...the Bears haven't been a winning team for a bit now so tell me what the relevance is again when Rodgers loses to winning away teams???
1) that cool chart was used as evidence as the op's loose reasoning as to why the Bears would win week 1, so me pointing out that the more relevant stat is the Bears record against Rodgers isn't changing the subject. As much as you say I changed the subject I didn't, I pointed out the fact that Rodgers record against winning teams doesn't change the fact the Bears haven't been able to beat a Rodgers led team.
2) you are grasping at any straw to keep a blind eye that Rodgers owns the Bears...It's sad, it's frustrating, and as much as I wish it was the other way around the reality is the Bears have sucked against GB since his arrival...So accepting that chart doesn't nullify how bad the Bears have been against him.
3) do you honestly believe that the op's chart will have any bearing on the outcome of week 1?
Mongo_76
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 2, 2013
- Posts:
- 9,959
- Liked Posts:
- 4,804
For the record,has anyone looked up thePackers record when facing .500 teams (or near .500) on the road?
Based on PFR, he is 4-0.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,325
- Liked Posts:
- 9,922
For the next billion years, one thing is a guarantee. We have to play the Packers twice a year.
I think the best opportunity to beat them is at home on a non-prime time game in week 1. It's the closest thing to an advantage we have. I kinda look at it like the Texans first game against the Cowboys in 2002. The Cowboys had no tape on them at all and nothing to expect. They probably overlooked them a bit. Obviously, this is different in we are not an expansion team. But a brand new system with every major coach being new. If the Packers are ever going to take us lightly, this is the game after that shitfest last year.
Not saying we will win. But I think if we can stay with them in the first half, we have a chance.
I think the best opportunity to beat them is at home on a non-prime time game in week 1. It's the closest thing to an advantage we have. I kinda look at it like the Texans first game against the Cowboys in 2002. The Cowboys had no tape on them at all and nothing to expect. They probably overlooked them a bit. Obviously, this is different in we are not an expansion team. But a brand new system with every major coach being new. If the Packers are ever going to take us lightly, this is the game after that shitfest last year.
Not saying we will win. But I think if we can stay with them in the first half, we have a chance.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,819
- Liked Posts:
- 3,527
You are so full of shit I'm surprised you can stay off the can long enough to post on a message board at all.
ptisme
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 10, 2014
- Posts:
- 153
- Liked Posts:
- 32
I'll counter with a much shorter version: Rodgers throws six touchdowns... The Bears are overmatched but there are signs in this game that these Bears are better coached and good things may be coming once this young team has some games to gel together. 49-13 Pack.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,325
- Liked Posts:
- 9,922
No one has even been blown out by 5 touchdowns at the NFL level and came out of the game thinking that "good things may be coming". Maybe if South East Appalachian State played Alabama...
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,819
- Liked Posts:
- 3,527
Beating the Packers is a big deal!! A better start might be trying to figure out a way to end our 2 year losing streak against the Lions! Just sayin.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,819
- Liked Posts:
- 3,527
I've revised that to 1-10 on the L Guapo hot air baloon.
ptisme
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 10, 2014
- Posts:
- 153
- Liked Posts:
- 32
1989 Dallas Cowboys
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,167
- Liked Posts:
- 21,820
- Location:
- Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
I miss the "Kick Six" Aaron Rodgers. 
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,564
- Liked Posts:
- 3,583
It's Guano
Guano (via Spanish, ultimately from the Quechua wanu) is the excrement of seabirds, cave-dwelling bats, pinnipeds(or in this case pinheads), or (in English usage) birds in general.[1] As a manure, guano is a highly effective fertilizer due to its exceptionally high content of nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium, three nutrients essential for plant growth.
Poppasmurf
New member
- Joined:
- Sep 1, 2012
- Posts:
- 971
- Liked Posts:
- 651
It's always funnier when you post a joke for the 3rd time
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
Again...you are still trying to buy your way out of the first homer post on this thread...created by you. The OP put up the facts...and they are facts...that your boy Rodgers has done really bad vs winning teams on the road. Accept it and move on.
Newsflash....again. The Bears haven't been a winning team and 0 & 0 is not a winning record hence the question as the last line in the OP topic. You are really trying way too hard to buy yourself out of this one. We all k ow you are a Rodgers homer but do it in another thread rather than one that shows his recent failures vs WINNING....key word winning....teams, not da Bears. Funny stuff
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
Soooo I take that as you were talking out your ass yet again and just admit to the whole board that you are so sad and pathetic that you just got called out on a blatant lie and couldn't back it up. What grade are you in again and thanks for showing that you are a really bad liar...:lmao: well played
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
Between Detoilet homers...you and ngknowzero about football...you guys together have the Gump factor that represents Detroit so well. We have a sad little grade school liar that was exposed in you as well as agknownothing about football who got beaten down by everyone for thinking Alshon's TDs in the first quarter vs the Lions were in garbage time!
You guys are almost as perfect as Detoilets perfect 16 & 0 season.....16 losses that is (in case you get that stat wrong as usual)
- Status
