JimJohnson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,190
- Liked Posts:
- 884
Agreed but it seems like DMelt is siding with the women who claim rape against Kane, even when there is no evidence.
Agreed but it seems like DMelt is siding with the women who claim rape against Kane, even when there is no evidence.
ClydeLee
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts:
- 14,829
- Liked Posts:
- 4,113
- Location:
- The OP
well to dbldrew, what's being argued about... the posts in this thread were merely about Grim.
And that comment just doesn't even make sense so okay.
And that comment just doesn't even make sense so okay.
JimJohnson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,190
- Liked Posts:
- 884
DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
I sided with no one.
JimJohnson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,190
- Liked Posts:
- 884
You said it's tough to side with anyone which is ridiculous since there is no evidence against Kane (your team's top player). You should side with him until he's proven guilty. That's how this whole thing works.
DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
This isn't a court of law.
JimJohnson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,190
- Liked Posts:
- 884
Nonetheless Kane is your guy so why not side with him until there is one fucking shred of evidence against him? What's the harm in it?
ClydeLee
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts:
- 14,829
- Liked Posts:
- 4,113
- Location:
- The OP
DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
Kane's not my guy. I can separate the player on the ice from the player off of it. He hasn't been convicted of anything so I'm not going to sit here and tell you that you have to hate him.
JimJohnson
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 5,190
- Liked Posts:
- 884
In this particular case it means the MVP of the NHL who happens to be on the Blackhawks. In other words, Hawks don't win shit if Kane isn't on this team. There is no evidence of rape or anything at this point in time so why would someone not defend Kane?
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,241
- Liked Posts:
- 7,739
- Location:
- Enemy Territory via southern C
well, in the court of public opinion Kane was on an airplane during the second very literary STORY. (what I mean by literary is a rape victim doesn't usually include writing elements of foreshadowing and suspense devices of repetition, etc)
In the first one her dad was a lawyer and her mom tried to forge an evidence tampering scenario, because of evidence that found multiple semens that weren't Kanes.
In the first one her dad was a lawyer and her mom tried to forge an evidence tampering scenario, because of evidence that found multiple semens that weren't Kanes.
DMelt36
Bolland > You
- Joined:
- May 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 13,969
- Liked Posts:
- 8,434
Because what he does on the ice means nothing off the ice. If I was on the same team as Kane, then maybe I'd feel compelled to defend him.
Either way, this story has since had so many holes punched in it that I don't give it much merit. And as I said in my first post in this thread, it's possible this thing was intended to be a fictional piece. Who knows. I'm done talking about this one unless something changes drastically.
Mattia
New member
- Joined:
- Dec 16, 2015
- Posts:
- 117
- Liked Posts:
- 13
- Location:
- Lugano (CH) and Milan (Italy)
In any case, they were right this past summer on Patrick Kane's story
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up -
PrideisBearsBully Mod
