nope. True champs tend to actually defend the title. Now, of course she'll challenge for the title again because the women's division is weak and she's clearly a good boxer. Wait a sec, weren't you talking about boxers being superior to mma fighters in a thread? No fucking wonder you're going all remy on this.
Sent from my bathroom using toilet talk
Your argument contradicts itself. Because the women's division is so weak, it means Holm doesn't get to make title defenses against scrubs. She went from taking down the No 1 women's fighter to taking on the No 3.
Again not that complicated. If Holly stays on her feet, she will likely win. If she doesn't then she will be in trouble. That's all that played out here.
I mean I am listening to Tate's press conference right now and even she is saying she knew she had to submit her in the 5th round because she knew she was down big enough that only a submission would win it. She also admitted that her takedown in the 5th was not even planned and it was just chaos which again is MMA. Shit happens.
So again, saying Holm's a fluke is dumb. She fought like a warrior. She didn't tap out.