- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 33,374
- Liked Posts:
- 27,841
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
they are citing what Vince Lombardi did to justify this move......
Yeah, seemed like a giant puff piece.
they are citing what Vince Lombardi did to justify this move......
Who gives a shit about the Lombardi vs. Thompson comparison.
Actually having a guy that knows the history of the franchise of the team he's covering is refreshing enough. It shows this guy actually did research before writing the piece and he had input from other personnel directors around the league aka guys who know the game (which so many desperately say is necessary in order to have an opinion on this board) about his decline in play.
You never get historical type of coverage by Bears beat writers.
As an example no one knew what to make of the Marc Trestman hire and merely pointed to his CFL experience.
No shit, because that isn't what a beat writer is supposed to be doing.
Biff your world is small.
You don't recall anyone discussing Trestman's previous NFL experience.......you moron
And what the fuck does releasing a pro-bowl OG have to do with Packer's history.......wtf is wrong with you
Yeah a beat writer isn't supposed to bring context or precedent to his articles.... What?
Nope, I think Modo was right. You're fucking Special person.Your stupidity makes me giggle. Everyone who pointed to Trestman's previous NFL experience all pointed to the statistical rankings of the teams he coached which is what the people on this board pointed to. When you have beat writers who do as thorough of a job as you and v your intellect it's a problem.
No one did the research on Trestman and then Jerry Rice makes a negative statement against the hire and the entire board comes unglued at one of the greatest receivers of all time and says his opinion doesn't matter.
If just for once you took off your Homer goggles and actually looked at a story in depth enough that you might realize there could be major concerns with a good signing.
Thank you. I was wondering what the hell 51 was talking about. They are going to justify the cut anyway they can in order to keep up the illusion of genius in the Packers front office. Truth is we got stronger, packers got weaker. Fuck the packers.
The packers have the most overrated FO in the league.
The only thing that you can tip their hat to is getting back to back HOF quarterbacks. In fact, I think the Packers may have the best history on QBs in the league. Getting two super bowls out of back to back HOF quarterbacks is not impressive.
The packers have the most overrated FO in the league.
The only thing that you can tip their hat to is getting back to back HOF quarterbacks. In fact, I think the Packers may have the best history on QBs in the league. Getting two super bowls out of back to back HOF quarterbacks is not impressive.
Your stupidity makes me giggle. Everyone who pointed to Trestman's previous NFL experience all pointed to the statistical rankings of the teams he coached which is what the people on this board pointed to. When you have beat writers who do as thorough of a job as you and v your intellect it's a problem.
No one did the research on Trestman and then Jerry Rice makes a negative statement against the hire and the entire board comes unglued at one of the greatest receivers of all time and says his opinion doesn't matter.
If just for once you took off your Homer goggles and actually looked at a story in depth enough that you might realize there could be major concerns with a good signing.