dabears70
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 31, 2013
- Posts:
- 33,792
- Liked Posts:
- -1,055
- Location:
- Orlando
Confused. Watson is 4 on this list. I was told that he was going to bust in the NFL or was at the very least not ready to start.
It's like that one crack pot that argues against the scientific experts and mountains of evidence that climate change is not real. Just because he types it doesn't make it suddenly true.Confused. Watson is 4 on this list. I was told that he was going to bust in the NFL or was at the very least not ready to start.
It's like that one crack pot that argues against the scientific experts and mountains of evidence that climate change is not real. Just because he types it doesn't make it suddenly true.
Michael Lombardi is an American football executive and media analyst. Until 2016 he was an assistant to the coaching staff of the New England Patriots and is a former analyst for the NFL Network and sportswriter at NFL.com.[1][2] Lombardi also previously served as an NFL executive with the San Francisco 49ers, Cleveland Browns, Philadelphia Eagles, and Oakland Raiders.[3] He currently works for Bill Simmons' website The Ringer.[4]
Confused. Watson is 4 on this list. I was told that he was going to bust in the NFL or was at the very least not ready to start.
I've read several different people say he's the most ready of the QBs.
It's fairly logical, imo. Kizer certainly needs time, Mahomes needs his mechanics reworked, and Trubisky, while probably the most polished of the group in terms of technique, didn't start until his last year (sitting and learning as long as he did is probably partly why he's the most polished).
I think if there's any QB as or more ready to play right away it might be Peterman; he's just not at the talent level of these others.
I've read several different people say he's the most ready of the QBs.
It's fairly logical, imo. Kizer certainly needs time, Mahomes needs his mechanics reworked, and Trubisky, while probably the most polished of the group in terms of technique, didn't start until his last year (sitting and learning as long as he did is probably partly why he's the most polished).
I think if there's any QB as or more ready to play right away it might be Peterman; he's just not at the talent level of these others.
I guess it comes back to, why are people so against taking a QB at 3?
if Glennon really blows next year we could put Watson in there at the half way point or at whatever point and not have to worry as much as we would with Trubisky, Mahomes or Kizer.
This is what it sounds like when Ommy Cries.Why waste a first-round pick (and first-round money) on one of those 14–15 prospects if you believe you can land one later and land another asset?
I think he is the most ready to play of the QB's in a certain sense. I think his ability to create with his legs make him instantly an NFL average QB, I also think he has the longest distance to go of the top 4 in the areas of arm talent and reads. Actually, I don't see his arm talent ever being NFL great or above average, so I think he is not far from his finished project. So in that twisted way I agree he is the most ready, but not in a good way. If the Bears draft him, I hope I am wrong.He has some credentials.
This is the simple truth. Listing any QB short of P Manning or A Luck as top 4 NFL ready as a rookie is just a clickbait lie.No QB is a most ready to play prospect. RBs, Gs and DL should be filling that list.
This is the simple truth. Listing any QB short of P Manning or A Luck as top 4 NFL ready as a rookie is just a clickbait lie.
I think he is the most ready to play of the QB's in a certain sense. I think his ability to create with his legs make him instantly an NFL average QB, I also think he has the longest distance to go of the top 4 in the areas of arm talent and reads. Actually, I don't see his arm talent ever being NFL great or above average, so I think he is not far from his finished project. So in that twisted way I agree he is the most ready, but not in a good way. If the Bears draft him, I hope I am wrong.
3. Malik Hooker, S, Ohio State
physical safeties can almost become liabilities if they can’t channel their headhunting. I believe Hooker is an ideal “modern” safety: long, athletic, fast, rangy, and instinctive to the ball.
Oh damn, this could be bad if we draft him.5. Solomon Thomas, DE/DT, Stanford
Just don’t put him in a 3–4 as he couldn’t use a five-technique or play nose.
Adams is exceptionally good but people need to be honest about his coverage skills versus those of Hooker.6. Jamal Adams, S, LSU
Only his lack of pure man-to-man coverage skills kept him from receiving a higher grade than Hooker.