Trubisky or Watson?

napo55 · Sep 30, 2017

As a Bear fan, I'm rooting for Trubisky all the way. But before the draft, I was hoping the Bears would pick Deshaun Watson. I see Trubisky as a better pure passer, but admire Watson's leadership qualities. What were others thinking on draft day?

Aesopian · Sep 30, 2017

Mitchell Trubisky has done a good job at getting the locker room behind him like Victor Cruz said "He has moxy".

I really wanted DeShone Kizer but he's 3 TD, 7 Int right now.

dentfan · Sep 30, 2017

I was all in on Trubisky. I've yet to be disappointed...

JordanHoward24 · Sep 30, 2017

I liked them both. But I thought Watson was the pick at the time.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Toast88 · Sep 30, 2017

With the caveat of it’s still extremely early...

Watson looks pretty solid, but I’d stick with Trubisky. Trubisky appears to be a lot more accurate probably (lots of lunging for catches in Houston). And he appears to have more upside.

But Watson looks better than Kizer. Who knows with Mahomes? Had a very impressive preseason game. Coaches here in KC keep calling him raw, though, and he appears to have accuracy issues (threw what should have been 3 INTs in that same preseason game that everyone went gaga over.)

DavidH · Sep 30, 2017

napo55 said:
As a Bear fan, I'm rooting for Trubisky all the way. But before the draft, I was hoping the Bears would pick Deshaun Watson. I see Trubisky as a better pure passer, but admire Watson's leadership qualities. What were others thinking on draft day?

i was going to renounce my fandom (ok not really) if they picked watson at #3 like was starting to be rumored by our local beat guys. i don't think he's going to be very good.
i wasn't expecting a qb but i liked mitch, so i was happy with the pick.

Wintermute · Sep 30, 2017

I said before I would be skipping in the damn street if they drafted either.

Need to get Fleecebiscuit in the game. Lets see what the kid can do.

Mjiton · Sep 30, 2017

I have been all in on Mitch from the get go. He is exactly what the Bears need.
Watson is a gunslinger who will throw Bomb TDs & Ints. He has lower accuracy and doesn't see the field the way Biscuit does.
Watson will excel on a team with quality WRs & a Deep threat WR. Meaning he is useless on the Bears.

Mitch is more of a technician who will dissect defenses & take his shots when he sees them.
Mitch will require more play time in order to face more elaborate defenses. So he can learn them on the field rather than a play book.
I see Mitch as a Peyton Manning, Tom Brady type. Who will make lemonade from the lemon WRs we have.

That has been my opinion for a while. Until he starts 3-5 games I won't know if I was wrong or not.

WindyCity · Sep 30, 2017

I love Watson. He is a leader.

But Trubisky's accuracy is special and his accuracy on the move is unique. I think accuracy is the single most important trait for a QB.

PrideisBears · Sep 30, 2017

DezBears said:
Mitchell Trubisky has done a good job at getting the locker room behind him like Victor Cruz said "He has moxy".

I really wanted DeShone Kizer but he's 3 TD, 7 Int right now.

Sadly that is statistically better than glennon

Milky · Sep 30, 2017

Trubs was my #1 prospect in the whole draft due to position so I was crazy happy when we got him.

Hopefully all the rumors are true and we get to see him Monday night.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bearly · Sep 30, 2017

I was thinking long term and had Watson as my 3rd QB. Mitch was my man and like Milky, would have taken him at one.

Aquineas · Sep 30, 2017

I don't get much into pre-draft prognostications anymore. They so-called draft pundits are usually so far off the market it's comical. That being said, I honestly wanted a receiver and hadn't paid much attention to Mitchell Trubisky.

wisconsinbearsfan · Sep 30, 2017

Before the draft for me was

Watson = bust
Trubisky = maybe special (top ceiling)
Mahomes = Brett Favre 2.0?

Milky · Sep 30, 2017

Bearly said:
I was thinking long term and had Watson as my 3rd QB. Mitch was my man and like Milky, would have taken him at one.

Funny thing is I had the top 4 QBs in the order they went which is rare for me. But I also thought there was almost no chance Kizer would get out of the 1st, I think he went 56th?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PickSix · Sep 30, 2017

I preferred Watson, but priority one was drafting a QB in the first which many didn't want to do.....because they were all gonna be busts and we had holes on the D. Priorty one was accomplished and look forward to enjoying Pace's genius and MT dominating the North.

DaaBears · Sep 30, 2017

Time machine - we are back visiting April 2017

ZOMBIE@CTESPN · Sep 30, 2017

This is irrelevant trubisky is our qb get on the band wagon unless you have a thing for giraffes whatever floats your boat

policeman · Sep 30, 2017

I will back whomever is the most successful and then insist I always wanted that guy.

xer0h0ur · Sep 30, 2017

Wanted Watson but said from the get go I didn't give a shit who Pace took but he absolutely had to take a quarterback in the 2017 draft. I would have been calling for his head on a silver platter if he went 3 years without drafting a starting caliber quarterback. I got behind Mitch from the moment they moved up to #2 and picked him. When they moved up I was like holy shit they're taking a QB but had no idea who. I was as happy as a pig in shit.

Trubisky or Watson?

Well-known member

Hooters Waitress

My favorite teams

No gods! No Masters!

Active member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

CCS Hall of Fame

Bully Mod

CCS Donator

Dissed membered

My favorite teams

CCS Donator

Active member

CCS Donator

Well-known member

CCS Donator

Well-known member

Son of beech

HS Referee HoF

My favorite teams