satchice
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,720
- Liked Posts:
- 1,463
- Location:
- Schaumburg
My favorite teams
The one's where he wasn't named Watson.
now that is some funny shit!
The one's where he wasn't named Watson.
Wow... lmao at getting ahead of yourself. Someone should save this.When Niners add some weapons and a couple impact players, Jimmy Garoppolo will make Niners fans think guys like Montana and Young were just slightly above average.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
one team is 1-10, the other is 3-8.............
scratching my head over that one.
The one's where he wasn't named Watson.
No need to get pissy. Even if Mitch had already sat for several years and the Bears just put in a new system that he only had a few weeks to learn and their receivers were worse and shorter than they are now, you wouldn’t stop using those things as excuses for the rest of the year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They both got good QBs.. But Pace identified his guy and took him .. Lynch waited and got lucky.
How did Hundley look in his first game?
Whoops..........
Funny how every Bears' opponent's receivers are always wide open, even teams with miserable WR corps, while ours never are.
It's just more excuses for Bears QBs. We've seen many all 22s this year where Mitch hasn't seen open receivers. Knowing when to release the ball and having your mechanics set to do it well reasonably consistently is half the battle. Mitch looks lost in the pocket a lot of the time.
Jimmy's field awareness, pocket presence and general command of the game around him is simply way more advanced than Mitch's. There's absolutely no point in arguing with anyone who doesn't acknowledge this. It's clear as day.
Or he completely outclassed Pace by using superior strategy. Take your pick...
That's the second time today you've applied something to me that I never said. Usually you're a decent poster but you turn into a cock when Trubisky is the topic. I don't care if you disagree with me about the QB play, but don't make up shit I never even said. Nobody has mentioned Watson for weeks.
Good lord ur dense...how many different offenses are there in the league? Routes? According to u having 3.5 years of NFL exp is nothing. How about different terminology and verbiage....thats the hurdle he had. Running a ton of the same plays with different verbiage....Not speed of game, not being coached poorly and game plans being a joke....but have fun. Oh by the way from a actual NFL QB
Learning a new offense is just like learning a new language. If I say, 'hello, my name is Jordan,' or 'hola, me llamo Jordan,' I'm saying the exact same thing," Palmer says. "I might call it Dot Right Two Jet Holt Bronco, or I might call it Divide Right 22 Hoss 678 Hook Flat. Those are the exact same thing, just using the language of two different systems.
Another excerpt: Not entirely, but as a rule of thumb, 80% of what NFL teams do on offense (or defense, really too) is extremely straightforward to the point where every team runs the same stuff. And the list is not that long. In an appendix at the bottom, I have cataloged basically the entire set. Most notably, the whole NFL's entire run game amounts to about four or five plays: the inside zone (also known as the "tight zone"), the outside zone (also known as the "stretch play" or the "wide zone"), power, counter, and some kind of draw, particularly the lead draw. No matter what cosmetic deceptions you see when you watch an NFL game (and remember, these cosmetics are supposed to be good enough to fool the opposing coaches who have studied film all week), you're seeing the same plays over, and over, and over again. There is some admitted monotony to this. Indeed, after today, having sketched out a great deal of this 80% of the NFL's offense, there won't be much need for me to come back to what a specific NFL teams do.
are those the same excuses you are using for JG terrible TD/INT rate this year?
You spent the first half the season being Watson's personal fluffer....
You reap what you sow.
I don’t think much of sitting. Hands on is the way to learn. And, ok, you don’t put as much emphasis on going from system to system as others do but there is a bit of time to get acclimated with the new playbook, lingo and what not. Sure you heard the excuse of different systems and different coordinators used here throughout the Cutler years just as often as I did.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is Jimmy Garoppolo after being in the league for 4 years better at this point than rookie Mitch Trubisky? Sure.
But I tell you what, I don't think it's by much and Mitch 3-4 years will be better than Jimmy G is right now.
2) Call me a homer, but I was on Cloud Nine yesterday. It didn't escape my attention that the Bears the Niners were playing weren't exactly the '85 Bears, but the SPEED at which Jimmy made decisions and got the ball out was what had my head spinning. The Niners have 2 very good tackles (Staley, Brown) but the interior 3 are trash. I watched poor CJ Beathard get beaten to a pulp for a month. Some of what you all are saying about no pressure and he had all day really isn't that accurate. A number of his throws where under duress and often he avoided pressure with his quick release. He is just more decisive and gets the ball out faster than I've seen in decades in SF.
Peace.
Holy hell whats next Tom Savage? JG is far more talented then Hundley so dont know what u point is. Also DOWELL greater than McCarthy and Shannahan as a play caller now too