What If

Dec 12, 2017

• #1

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

So....who would be ok with keeping Fox and Fangio if we brought in a better OC to help develop Trubisky. My fear is that wholesale changes would set us back a few years. We have a better than average defense and an OC with better plays and play calling ability could mask Fox’s shortcomings. That’s my thought. What are yours ?

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #2

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie

Joined:

Apr 25, 2014

Posts:

10,507

Liked Posts:

11,929

Location:

Tennessee

My favorite teams

1. 

1. 

1. 
2. 

Gocrazy79 said:

So....who would be ok with keeping Fox and Fangio if we brought in a better OC to help develop Trubisky. My fear is that wholesale changes would set us back a few years. We have a better than average defense and an OC with better plays and play calling ability could mask Fox’s shortcomings. That’s my thought. What are yours ?

Click to expand...

Fox is the offensive problems. Loggains does alright from time to time. Loggains and Trubisky have both hinted towards Fox holding them back

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #3

dweebs19

CCS Donator

Donator

Joined:

Aug 16, 2011

Posts:

9,049

Liked Posts:

5,569

rather keep Loggains over Fox. Fox is actually the problem

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #4

BradyJay

Well-known member

Joined:

Sep 4, 2012

Posts:

2,082

Liked Posts:

1,386

Location:

WI Dells, WI

No. The Bears have talent, they need coaching...

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #5

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie

Joined:

Apr 25, 2014

Posts:

10,507

Liked Posts:

11,929

Location:

Tennessee

My favorite teams

1. 

1. 

1. 
2. 

I'd rather give the keys to Dave Ragone than let Fox retain his position

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #6

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

Does Fox not have confidence in Loggains playcalling? That would cause him to hold him back. Can’t discount Fox and his experience with the game and having high level success in the NFL. So is Fox a better coach with a better OC?

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #7

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

Would we be ok with:

HC: Fox
OC: Kubiak
DC: Fangio

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #8

legendxofxlink

Whistle Dixie

Joined:

Apr 25, 2014

Posts:

10,507

Liked Posts:

11,929

Location:

Tennessee

My favorite teams

1. 

1. 

1. 
2. 

Gocrazy79 said:

Does Fox not have confidence in Loggains playcalling? That would cause him to hold him back. Can’t discount Fox and his experience with the game and having high level success in the NFL. So is Fox a better coach with a better OC?

Click to expand...

Everywhere Fox has been, the team got better when he left. . .

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #9

Teddy KGB

Cultural Icon

Joined:

Apr 25, 2011

Posts:

7,801

Liked Posts:

4,579

Gocrazy79 said:

So....who would be ok with keeping Fox and Fangio if we brought in a better OC to help develop Trubisky. My fear is that wholesale changes would set us back a few years. We have a better than average defense and an OC with better plays and play calling ability could mask Fox’s shortcomings. That’s my thought. What are yours ?

Click to expand...

Your fears are unfounded and doing it your way would set the franchise back. It's not as if we are getting rid of a very good offensive play caller.

Trust me, they will get the right coach and all will be well

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #10

TheeUndyingFan

Dragon of Dojima

Joined:

Aug 23, 2012

Posts:

1,117

Liked Posts:

999

Location:

Illinois

My favorite teams

1. 

1. 

Gocrazy79 said:

Would we be ok with:

HC: Fox
OC: Kubiak
DC: Fangio

Click to expand...

LMAO, this is never happening.

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #11

freddylamar

Well-known member

Joined:

Sep 22, 2012

Posts:

797

Liked Posts:

1,063

Is OP John Fox's alt account?

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #12

Foreign Banana

New member

Joined:

Dec 5, 2017

Posts:

40

Liked Posts:

18

Where I was born people often say, "Do not burn hogs of dreaming calendars".

(it reads very nice in native language)

It means never only do part of something, do all of something.

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #13

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

Nope! Just wondering the impact of starting all over with new staff

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #14

Les Grossman

Well-known member

Joined:

Jun 22, 2011

Posts:

13,820

Liked Posts:

12,607

Gocrazy79 said:

Would we be ok with:

HC: Fox
OC: Kubiak
DC: Fangio

Click to expand...

LMAO, you do know that Kubiak was the one that replaced Fox when he was fired from DEN and then won a SB there, right?

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #15

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

Good point.

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #16

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

I like the logic, but what if an entirely new staff doesn’t net the results we ALL want?

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #17

Gocrazy79

New member

Joined:

Mar 22, 2016

Posts:

13

Liked Posts:

1

Defense suffers as well with staff overhaul

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #18

Noonthirtyjoe

Well-known member

Joined:

Jul 22, 2013

Posts:

7,346

Liked Posts:

3,561

Fox has got to go. I like our oc dc.

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #19

bearmick

Captain Objectivity

Donator

CCS Hall of Fame '19

Joined:

Aug 20, 2012

Posts:

37,895

Liked Posts:

43,086

They'll be getting an entirely new coaching staff and it's for the best.

 

Dec 12, 2017

• #20

Bearly

Dissed membered

Donator

Joined:

Aug 17, 2011

Posts:

41,365

Liked Posts:

23,651

Location:

Palatine, IL

My favorite teams

1. 

1. 

1. 

1. 

You crazy.