IST: Cubs @ Kansas City

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
a) OBA/OBP is a component of OPS. If they look at OPS, Javy ranks well, in spite of the OBP.

b) He doesn't enough GG consideration because he plays multiple positions, but he is great at all of them.

c) Pitching IS in consideration for MVP - and I think they already have that award, so I wish it wasn't.

OBA and SLG are not equal values so OPS is a faulty bench mark. If you want to have conversations on metrics is starts with wOBA and gets deeper with wRC+
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Not disagreeing with your prognosis, just the way the award is perceived. It's not just an offensive award or at least it shouldn't be. It should be an all around award where offense, defense and baserunning have equal parts. While both Goldy and Freeman are good fielders, they do not change games with their defense and they certainly don't with their baserunning. Baez has won games on all three parts and has done it multiple times on each. The season he's having is very unique and something that neither Goldy or Freeman are in any way capable of.

Don’t get me wrong. I love Javy’s game and even Hamels said that he had a Hall of fame 3B for years and Javy is bordering that territory.

But there are 2 things working against him.

1. Doesn’t take walks. Even 8% would be acceptable. It shows too agressive. (Under 4% current)

2. Not a set position. Making great plays is fantastic. But when compared to his peers well what is he?
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,265
Liked Posts:
6,685
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Don’t get me wrong. I love Javy’s game and even Hamels said that he had a Hall of fame 3B for years and Javy is bordering that territory.

But there are 2 things working against him.

1. Doesn’t take walks. Even 8% would be acceptable. It shows too agressive.

2. Not a set position. Making great plays is fantastic. But when compared to his peers well what is he?

Ahhh, but once again this makes him more "valuable". How many positions can Goldy or Freeman play? Plus they are always 2, 3 or 4 on the lineup card where Baez bats seemingly everywhere. What's wrong with aggressive? How many times has Baez taken a pitch out of the strike zone and drove it down the line to drive in runs? He takes a walk in those situations and it falls on someone else to do the job....that's not what MVPs do.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
Ahhh, but once again this makes him more "valuable". How many positions can Goldy or Freeman play? Plus they are always 2, 3 or 4 on the lineup card where Baez bats seemingly everywhere. What's wrong with aggressive? How many times has Baez taken a pitch out of the strike zone and drove it down the line to drive in runs? He takes a walk in those situations and it falls on someone else to do the job....that's not what MVPs do.

More valuable to Joe’s method. Joe doesn’t hold a vote.

Again don’t get me wrong. I love the guy. But...
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,173
Liked Posts:
12,172
OBA and SLG are not equal values so OPS is a faulty bench mark. If you want to have conversations on metrics is starts with wOBA and gets deeper with wRC+

wRC+ is a much better stat, IMO. It's easier to understand; 100 is an average player and 110 is 10% better than average, etc. With wOBA you have to remember arbitrary ranges that don't make much sense. It also takes park factors into account, while wOBA doesn't.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,924
Bote Ball continues

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
34,072
Liked Posts:
34,121
Location:
Cumming
San Diego up 7-5 in top 7th over Brew Crew.
Is it San Degan or San Diegoite?
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
wRC+ is a much better stat, IMO. It's easier to understand; 100 is an average player and 110 is 10% better than average, etc. With wOBA you have to remember arbitrary ranges that don't make much sense. It also takes park factors into account, while wOBA doesn't.

Fair enough
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
But using wRC+ as a gauge:

1. Carpenter: 160
2. Suarez: 154
3. Yelich: 147
4. Freeman: 146
5. Arenado: 143
6. Aguilar: 142
7. Baez: 141
8. Goldscmidt: 140

I really think it is hard to argue against Matt right now.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
34,072
Liked Posts:
34,121
Location:
Cumming
San Diego's leadoff hitter with 5RBI as SD scores 11 runs from innings 3 thru 9 after giving up a 4spot in the first
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
34,072
Liked Posts:
34,121
Location:
Cumming
But using wRC+ as a gauge:

1. Carpenter: 160
2. Suarez: 154
3. Yelich: 147
4. Freeman: 146
5. Arenado: 143
6. Aguilar: 142
7. Baez: 141
8. Goldscmidt: 140

I really think it is hard to argue against Matt right now.

The amazing part is that he started off so freaking terrible this year until about mid-May
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,924
But using wRC+ as a gauge:

1. Carpenter: 160
2. Suarez: 154
3. Yelich: 147
4. Freeman: 146
5. Arenado: 143
6. Aguilar: 142
7. Baez: 141
8. Goldscmidt: 140

I really think it is hard to argue against Matt right now.
The argument i heard against Carpenter was that he struggled bad his first 2 months, so they may use that against him...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
32,576
Liked Posts:
18,975
Womp womp.

Next time, pick a hill to die on that can't be disproved with two minutes of research.

Your research is to use a stat, WAR, that only recently became available to compare players’ seasons from decades ago.

Nobody had Arky Vaughn’s WAR when they voted.

That being said, WAR is still an imperfect measurement. Baez is better than Matt Capenter defensively and as a baserunner and it’s not remotely close. But Carpenter has a higher WAR due greatly to walls.

I get the obp importance, but there is no way he has been more valuable when he is so flawed in so many categories: glove, arm, baserunning.
 

anotheridiot

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2016
Posts:
5,935
Liked Posts:
799
The argument i heard against Carpenter was that he struggled bad his first 2 months, so they may use that against him...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

So Baez and Carpenter struggled, Freeman will split votes with his Atlanta team mate, I guess that leaves Suarez.
 

fatbeard

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 25, 2013
Posts:
13,173
Liked Posts:
12,172
Your research is to use a stat, WAR, that only recently became available to compare players’ seasons from decades ago.

Nobody had Arky Vaughn’s WAR when they voted.

Irrelevant; Vaughn still beat Hartnett on the all counting stats that were available at the time. AVG, H, HR, R, RBI, OBP, SLG...pick your poison.

That being said, WAR is still an imperfect measurement. Baez is better than Matt Capenter defensively and as a baserunner and it’s not remotely close. But Carpenter has a higher WAR due greatly to walls.

I get the obp importance, but there is no way he has been more valuable when he is so flawed in so many categories: glove, arm, baserunning.

All stats that aren't counting stats are imperfect, it's just a question of how imperfect they are. WAR is pretty good, but has flaws (bWAR has Cain as the NL MVP!) But this makes my point: When you have a cluster of players with similar WARs, it's fine to look at other factors that might differentiate their seasons when considering the MVP.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
17,960
Liked Posts:
2,775
Location:
San Diego
The argument i heard against Carpenter was that he struggled bad his first 2 months, so they may use that against him...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Means little. What factors is how the team does imo. Dawson was a exception to the rule because he was clearly better then the rest. But when you look at a group of 5 guys then you start nit picking. Like are they a contender or not. Is that player the main cog or a product of a strong support cast.

Baez has a strong arguement here. Carpenter may be the correct choice today but the Cards blow and Carpenter is not producing at Trout’s level that supersedes any team concideration.
 

Top