NO, what I am saying is the end result was exactly what it should have been, loss of down, and possession by the Bears at the original line of scrimmage. Not Eagles ball, not a completed pass and possession by the Bears at the spot of the fumble. So, as long as the net result was what I believe it should have been, no harm, no foul (my opinion).
I then went on to say how I believe wording should be added (my opinion) to the rules to address exactly what happened, and make it a little clearer in the future, while preserving the intent of the rule.
I don't believe the rule needs to be changed to give possession to the offense on an uncontested fumble, in this particular case, because in (again my opinion) the ball was being contested before Robinson completed the catch. Logic dictates that if the catch is being contested, it is not a catch, at least not before the player is down by contact.
Of course, if the catch wasn't being contested, and Robinson still fumbled the ball after making a football move, and the ball still had no clear recovery, that is a different can of worms. However, under those circumstances, I don't ever see that happening.
Are you (and Sculpt) trying to say that logic dictates it should have been Bears ball on that specific play at the spot of the fumble, and the rules should be changed so that if that ever happened again, that would be the case? I don't agree with this.