Is anyone optimistic about next season?

Aquineas

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
7,022
Liked Posts:
6,113
Location:
Montgomery, TX
I generally try to remain optimistic and hopeful about this team, but so far I don't have confidence in the early coaching moves.
  • I didn't want to lose Helfrich- I would have much rather seen some games where he called plays. Now granted, I don't know for certain that he didn't call plays, but it sure seemed like every time on offense it was always Nagy who was speaking into the QB radio. You know with some teams, there are offensive systems that you know have game-planned well and you know their scripted plays, usually the first 8-10 offensive plays, are going to lead to an efficient opening drive with a possible score. New Orleans is one of those teams- you always know they're going to at least move the ball on their first drive. With the Bears, the opposite is true. You could almost always assume that the Bears would open their first several drives with 3 and outs. These coaches could not put an effective offensive game-plan together to save their lives. So my questions around the OC position are: is Nagy the problem? Will he insist on calling the plays when a new OC comes in? And will his insistence on calling plays deter a quality OC from coming in?
  • I'm not yet sold on Juan Castillo.
  • Pace and Nagy seemed to have doubled down on their previous decisions. Committing to Mitch as the starter? Why do that now? Mitch has not consistently played like an NFL starter. Now I get the part about the running game generally sucking for much of the year and the offensive line not playing well, but at the end of the 2018 season, my feeling about Mitch was I saw some good things by Mitch and plenty of "WTF was that moments?" where his footwork led to wildly inaccurate passes with no ability to hit anyone deep downfield. "Give him another year in the system, and he'll improve." Well he's had another year in the system, and we still see occasional good moments but still far too many wildly inaccurate passes (again, mostly due to inconsistent footwork) and too many "WTF moments."
  • When Nagy defiantly stated in an interview this season, "I didn't come here to run the I-formation" (or something along those lines), well, my question is, if it's working, why the heck not? Don't try to be the "cute" genius that can't adjust your play calling to your team's strengths and weakness. Actually, that's my biggest criticism of Nagy- he does exactly that. Nagy seems to think he's still in Kansas City and has world class speed all over his roster. He does not. And if your offensive line is happy because they're knocking mother-fuckers off the ball in the I-formation and you're moving the ball (albeit slowly), then dammit beat the living crap out of that defense.
  • Harry Hiestand coached a helluva college offensive line. Yeah, this line sucked. But how much of that was because of system, players
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
5,696
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Absolutely
 

Aquineas

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
7,022
Liked Posts:
6,113
Location:
Montgomery, TX
I didn’t read all that but my answer to thread title as of right now is ask me after the draft it’s way too early at this time
IMHO, after the draft is the worst time to gauge a team. Way too much optimism for unproven 23 year-olds and their ability to impact a team. On the Bears anyway, very rarely has hype about draft picks translated to decent play.
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
35,551
Liked Posts:
43,517
Hard to say right now. Gotta see how FA/draft goes. All I know is you cannot make a couple assistant coach changes and think this team as currently constructed will turn it around in ‘20.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
17,958
Liked Posts:
19,656
Location:
MICHIGAN
IMHO, after the draft is the worst time to gauge a team. Way too much optimism for unproven 23 year-olds and their ability to impact a team. On the Bears anyway, very rarely has hype about draft picks translated to decent play.
True but it’s really the culmination of free agency and cap cuts that happen after the draft that I’m also figuring into the equation.

so if you’re asking should I be optimistic going into next season with the 2019 squad progressing I’m saying fuck no. I have to see the final masterpiece to give a real evaluation of things.
 

BigTom

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
1,077
Liked Posts:
970
It's the NFL, there should always be optimism in the off season. Teams move in and out of the playoffs every year. The Bears have enough proven talent that they can be competitive and go 8-8 in a year where the offense was atrocious. Get some actual production from the offense and a few more turnovers to go the defenses way and they're right back to an 11-13 win team and in the playoffs. Of course it could just as easily go the opposite direction and turn into a 4-12 season but might as well be optimistic for now.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
32,458
Liked Posts:
18,911
I generally try to remain optimistic and hopeful about this team, but so far I don't have confidence in the early coaching moves.
  • I didn't want to lose Helfrich- I would have much rather seen some games where he called plays. Now granted, I don't know for certain that he didn't call plays, but it sure seemed like every time on offense it was always Nagy who was speaking into the QB radio. You know with some teams, there are offensive systems that you know have game-planned well and you know their scripted plays, usually the first 8-10 offensive plays, are going to lead to an efficient opening drive with a possible score. New Orleans is one of those teams- you always know they're going to at least move the ball on their first drive. With the Bears, the opposite is true. You could almost always assume that the Bears would open their first several drives with 3 and outs. These coaches could not put an effective offensive game-plan together to save their lives. So my questions around the OC position are: is Nagy the problem? Will he insist on calling the plays when a new OC comes in? And will his insistence on calling plays deter a quality OC from coming in?
  • I'm not yet sold on Juan Castillo.
  • Pace and Nagy seemed to have doubled down on their previous decisions. Committing to Mitch as the starter? Why do that now? Mitch has not consistently played like an NFL starter. Now I get the part about the running game generally sucking for much of the year and the offensive line not playing well, but at the end of the 2018 season, my feeling about Mitch was I saw some good things by Mitch and plenty of "WTF was that moments?" where his footwork led to wildly inaccurate passes with no ability to hit anyone deep downfield. "Give him another year in the system, and he'll improve." Well he's had another year in the system, and we still see occasional good moments but still far too many wildly inaccurate passes (again, mostly due to inconsistent footwork) and too many "WTF moments."
  • When Nagy defiantly stated in an interview this season, "I didn't come here to run the I-formation" (or something along those lines), well, my question is, if it's working, why the heck not? Don't try to be the "cute" genius that can't adjust your play calling to your team's strengths and weakness. Actually, that's my biggest criticism of Nagy- he does exactly that. Nagy seems to think he's still in Kansas City and has world class speed all over his roster. He does not. And if your offensive line is happy because they're knocking mother-fuckers off the ball in the I-formation and you're moving the ball (albeit slowly), then dammit beat the living crap out of that defense.
  • Harry Hiestand coached a helluva college offensive line. Yeah, this line sucked. But how much of that was because of system, players
Nobody on the Bears' offensive line can knock anyone off the ball.
 

westcoast bear fanatic

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 11, 2014
Posts:
4,514
Liked Posts:
3,069
Not with Mitch at the helm. He will Blake Bortles us into oblivion. Wake me up when he is replaced.
 

Bears4Ever_34

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
13,530
Liked Posts:
10,012
It honestly all depends on who the quarterback is. Hard to get enthused if they're just going to run this whole thing back again with Mitch under center. Problem is, outside of the pipe dream of getting Tom Brady or maybe Nick Foles at a discount, I'm not sure who else is out there in free agency that I'd rather have right now. It certainly wouldn't be Marcus Mariota or Andy Dalton.
 

Black Rainbow

ChatGPT Created Account
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
17,440
Liked Posts:
8,141
Most important thing is bringing in a veteran QB to backup Trubisky.

If they bring in no one, completely skip the preseason, and try to sell me, "Mitch looks like he graduated to level 300 in our closed, simulated game." Get ready for a long season.
 

Southside

Active member
Joined:
Sep 27, 2018
Posts:
268
Liked Posts:
294
Im not optimisitc at all with Trubisky at QB, in fact the moment that killed me was the press conference. Especially when George McCaskey said that we need to score more points on defense. If you draft a QB #2 overall, he's supposed to be a difference maker who elevates your team, not a guy who gets masked by his defense.

That entire press conference was disappointing, and it feels like the team is more concerned with making Trubisky look good than winning games. Trubisky is so far behind that you can't develope him AND win 10+ game simutaneously. Bears have to make a choice and they are chosing Trubisky over the best interest of the rest of the team, wasting primes. They are also disrespecting the fanbase who already know that Mitch sucks, we've watched him for 41 games. It's about to be year 4. For them to feed us this, "we need more time to evaluate him" narrative is an insult to our intelligence. When/if he still sucks after 50 games, then what?

We averaged 18.6 ppg against on defense whch was good enough for 4th in the league, and yet we barely eeked our way to .500 record. But none of the guys at the top seem to want to hold Trubisky accountable for wasting an entire season, if he cant make the playoffs with the 4th ranked defense then how will he carry the Bears in the future as we get older on defense? I wouldnt be shocked if we were under .500 next year. Could you imagine if we had no defense or our defense had been ranked 25th or lower, how bad our record would have been this season with Mitch? We seriously may have only won 5/6 games.
 

Jack Lantern

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 27, 2019
Posts:
2,574
Liked Posts:
1,912
Think positive Southside!

If Nagy sends Mitch out week after week and he continues to struggle, he'll just end up losing the locker room which will just equate to more losses which in a way may be a good thing cause it'll just accelerate Nagy and Pace's walking papers.
 

Top