I can't evaluate talent for shit (for example I thought Matt Forte looked slow on tape). So I won't commit to saying yes or no. But there are people out there who are not dummies who would say no based on poor performance against top teams and for similar reasons to Fields - ball security and...
Just heard him interviewed by Marvez and Davis on Late Hits.
They asked about the ninth pick and he said they will narrow it down to the five or six highest rated across positions then take the best one left on the board. He said all the off-season acquisitions would allow them to be flexible...
I won't be mad if they take Nabers or Odunze if they are there at nine. I won't be mad if they take a can't miss edge or OT or trade back either.
The problem is the drop off after Moore and Allen is pretty bad. Guys like Jones and Scott would barely make it as depth on a lot of teams.
I don't remember anyone being okay with not getting Fields any weapons. I do remember saying BPA makes a certain amount of sense on a team so historically bad that virtually every position was a position of need.
Despite my generally distrustful nature and some questionable recent moves on Poles' part I decide to trust him on this one. If he trades down a couple spots for Daniels I won't criticize him and if he runs to the podium to take Williams I won't criticize him. We won't actually know what the...
Seems like the obvious answer is staring at us but no one seems to see it?
Just cause Fields isn't already gone doesn't mean Poles isn't drafting a QB and Fields isn't getting traded. Maybe he won't take pennies on the dollar even if the league has decided Fields is a career backup.
Most...