2/27 IGT: Blackhawks at Lightning

zack54attack

Bears
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
18,638
Liked Posts:
7,649
Location:
Forest Park
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. North Carolina Tar Heels
Chicago Blackhawks 27-28-8 (62 points) AT Tampa Bay Lightning 40-18-5 (85 points
Date: 2/27
Time: 6:00 p.m. CDT
Location: Amalie Arena
4733
 

WesIsaLeo

Member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2019
Posts:
104
Liked Posts:
86
And there it is.

Once again a goalie is burned after making save after tough save after difficult save due to the comical inability of this team to clear the zone (except by accident; puck hops over a stick, etc.)
 

Jack Lantern

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 27, 2019
Posts:
2,574
Liked Posts:
1,912
2-2!

Kubalik's price tag is going up with each goal. Let's hope he doesn't turn into a 1 year wonder like Debrincat...
 

WesIsaLeo

Member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2019
Posts:
104
Liked Posts:
86
Hope this lead holds up. Nice to see Chicago play like they can after keeping things close for so long...despite the usual own-zone follies.

DeBrincat could still notch 20 goals which is a more in-line number for someone who had 15% and 18% shooting stats the last two years.

I don’t see him as a pan-flash; just someone who had an incredible year a-la Karlsson in Vegas who shouldn’t be expected to repeat that crazy success every year afterward.
 

Jack Lantern

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 27, 2019
Posts:
2,574
Liked Posts:
1,912
Hope this lead holds up. Nice to see Chicago play like they can after keeping things close for so long...despite the usual own-zone follies.

DeBrincat could still notch 20 goals which is a more in-line number for someone who had 15% and 18% shooting stats the last two years.

I don’t see him as a pan-flash; just someone who had an incredible year a-la Karlsson in Vegas who shouldn’t be expected to repeat that crazy success every year afterward.

Thing with Cat is he is a one trick pony. He's not good defensively. Not gonna win any board battles with his size and goalies will easily look over him if he tries to screen in front of the net.

Think of it this way. He put up 41 goals last season in a contract year and ended up a PLUS/MINUS ZERO, lol.

You put up that many goals you should be in the PLUS double digit column easy. Just goes to show how much of a liability he is defensively when he's on the ice.
 

zack54attack

Bears
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
18,638
Liked Posts:
7,649
Location:
Forest Park
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. North Carolina Tar Heels
Wow. That was impressive
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,654
Kub's agent must have popped open a couple bottles of champagne.
That win caught me totally off guard after the first two dumpster fires periods.
 

galaxytrash

Member
Joined:
Oct 12, 2019
Posts:
41
Liked Posts:
74
Thing with Cat is he is a one trick pony. He's not good defensively. Not gonna win any board battles with his size and goalies will easily look over him if he tries to screen in front of the net.

Think of it this way. He put up 41 goals last season in a contract year and ended up a PLUS/MINUS ZERO, lol.

You put up that many goals you should be in the PLUS double digit column easy. Just goes to show how much of a liability he is defensively when he's on the ice.

his contract year was supposed to be this year actually. they extended him but he's still on under 900k this year.

i sort've agree with the rest of your post but for his size, i think he's pretty good along the boards.

if he was a defensive juggernaut ....he'd have easily gone top 10, not #39.
 

anotheridiot

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2016
Posts:
5,935
Liked Posts:
799
if this team can find a way to start playing when the game starts they could actually have a shot at winning every game.
First time since 2009 the hawks won in Tampa. First time in a long time the lightning lost after winning going into the third.

Another sensational find by the scouts in europe which should be a great feather in the cap of this organization, guessing Kubalik goes the way of the last few european finds like Panarin and is deemed unaffordable.
 

Granada

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 14, 2019
Posts:
11,439
Liked Posts:
2,751
if this team can find a way to start playing when the game starts they could actually have a shot at winning every game.
First time since 2009 the hawks won in Tampa. First time in a long time the lightning lost after winning going into the third.

Another sensational find by the scouts in europe which should be a great feather in the cap of this organization, guessing Kubalik goes the way of the last few european finds like Panarin and is deemed unaffordable.

Some perspective: it's one win, against a cold team (TB lost 3 in a row heading in), with many of their starting players out, including their best player in Steve Stamkos.

Kubalik won't be lost, if he's not asking for the moon or if the Hawks genuinely want to retain him. All he would have to do essentially is trade Saad this off-season, which shouldn't be all that hard -- he doesn't have a NMC and only has one year left on his contract. Not necessarily advocating that, but just saying: Bowman has options, it's not like his hands are tied with re-signing Kubalik.
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,265
Liked Posts:
6,685
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Some perspective: it's one win, against a cold team (TB lost 3 in a row heading in), with many of their starting players out, including their best player in Steve Stamkos.

Kubalik won't be lost, if he's not asking for the moon or if the Hawks genuinely want to retain him. All he would have to do essentially is trade Saad this off-season, which shouldn't be all that hard -- he doesn't have a NMC and only has one year left on his contract. Not necessarily advocating that, but just saying: Bowman has options, it's not like his hands are tied with re-signing Kubalik.

Not sure what team he's watching but the Hawks were either tied or leading after one period or at least tied at some point in the second period in 10 of their last 11 games. I'm not saying they were playing great hockey but mostly thanks to goaltending, they've had their chances. But that's what usually happens when you are not the better team.....I sincerely hope it's not Bowman making the needed moves, but there is a lot of work to be done. One win vs a good team doesn't mean much.
 

anotheridiot

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2016
Posts:
5,935
Liked Posts:
799
Some perspective: it's one win, against a cold team (TB lost 3 in a row heading in), with many of their starting players out, including their best player in Steve Stamkos.

Kubalik won't be lost, if he's not asking for the moon or if the Hawks genuinely want to retain him. All he would have to do essentially is trade Saad this off-season, which shouldn't be all that hard -- he doesn't have a NMC and only has one year left on his contract. Not necessarily advocating that, but just saying: Bowman has options, it's not like his hands are tied with re-signing Kubalik.

Well, remember when it was time to sign Panarin? They traded Saad to be able to afford him, got Panarin to sign a 2 year 6 million per year dollar deal, and still moved him figuring they could not afford to keep him after that deal or some other made up reason in that head of his. Panarin did not really cost that much more at 6 million since he hit almost all of his performance bonus dollars. The knock was he did not show up in the second year he was in the playoffs with chicago. First year, 7 playoff games 7 points, second year 4 games 1 point -4 rating and he was gone.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,605
Liked Posts:
3,088
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Thing with Cat is he is a one trick pony. He's not good defensively. Not gonna win any board battles with his size and goalies will easily look over him if he tries to screen in front of the net.

Think of it this way. He put up 41 goals last season in a contract year and ended up a PLUS/MINUS ZERO, lol.

You put up that many goals you should be in the PLUS double digit column easy. Just goes to show how much of a liability he is defensively when he's on the ice.
To be fair to Debrincat, his +/- is a combo of line/players iced with him stat in terms of variance from line mates. And Kane/Strome were merely a +2. With Kane putting up 3 more goals and over 20 more points, what's that say about Kane?

He's not good defensively, but really, no one has been on the 'hawks since 2015. They've had to rely on goaltending to save them. When they don't have it things go to shit fast.
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,265
Liked Posts:
6,685
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
To be fair to Debrincat, his +/- is a combo of line/players iced with him stat in terms of variance from line mates. And Kane/Strome were merely a +2. With Kane putting up 3 more goals and over 20 more points, what's that say about Kane?

He's not good defensively, but really, no one has been on the 'hawks since 2015. They've had to rely on goaltending to save them. When they don't have it things go to shit fast.

Excellent point, it's just so true. Besides, anyone who uses +/- as a parameter for player worth either knows nothing about the game or is just a moron. It's such a bogus stat that relies on so many uncontrollable circumstances that it should be removed from all NHL databases.

Example: based on +/- Ryan Graves is the best defender in the NHL and Drew Doughty is one of the worst. What a joke....the "best" defender didn't even make the All-Star team.
 

Granada

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 14, 2019
Posts:
11,439
Liked Posts:
2,751
Well, remember when it was time to sign Panarin? They traded Saad to be able to afford him, got Panarin to sign a 2 year 6 million per year dollar deal, and still moved him figuring they could not afford to keep him after that deal or some other made up reason in that head of his. Panarin did not really cost that much more at 6 million since he hit almost all of his performance bonus dollars. The knock was he did not show up in the second year he was in the playoffs with chicago. First year, 7 playoff games 7 points, second year 4 games 1 point -4 rating and he was gone.

Panarin was already re-signed by the Hawks when Bowman traded him for Saad. Bowman traded him because he's an idiot, it had nothing to do with cap.

Also, the knock on Panarin was that he wasn't a two-way player (whereas Saad was) and couldn't play without Kane on his line. In other words, he was inflexible in the lineup, and Bowman wanted someone who could jump-start Toews in Saad.
 

anotheridiot

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2016
Posts:
5,935
Liked Posts:
799
Panarin was already re-signed by the Hawks when Bowman traded him for Saad. Bowman traded him because he's an idiot, it had nothing to do with cap.

Also, the knock on Panarin was that he wasn't a two-way player (whereas Saad was) and couldn't play without Kane on his line. In other words, he was inflexible in the lineup, and Bowman wanted someone who could jump-start Toews in Saad.
Yeah, that was the point, even when we resigned him for an affordable dollar, he still dealt him, so what would stop him from doing the same stupid mistake with Kubalik?
 

Granada

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 14, 2019
Posts:
11,439
Liked Posts:
2,751
Yeah, that was the point, even when we resigned him for an affordable dollar, he still dealt him, so what would stop him from doing the same stupid mistake with Kubalik?

There's a difference between being "un-affordable," and being affordable (i.e. re-signed) only to be moved. But anyways...

You might as well ask, what's stopping Bowman from being an idiot. The only answer to that, is him being fired by the organization.
 

Jack Lantern

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 27, 2019
Posts:
2,574
Liked Posts:
1,912
Plus Minus is goal differential. Look at all bad NHL teams and look at their differentials...all in the negative column, lol So looks there is a link to that overrated stat in relation to team success.
https://www.espn.com/nhl/standings

Cat is so overrated.
 
Last edited:

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,265
Liked Posts:
6,685
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
"A player is awarded a "plus" each time he is on the ice when his Club scores an even-strength or shorthanded goal. He receives a "minus" if he is on the ice for an even-strength or shorthanded goal scored by the opposing Club. The difference in these numbers is considered the player's "plus-minus" statistic. "

"Goal difference (or points difference) is calculated as the number of goals (or points) scored in all league matches minus the number of goals or points conceded."

Two different things......learn the game or quit pretending that you do.
 

Top