In-Depth Trubisky Breakdown And Possible Scheme Fit

Adipost

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
8,618
Liked Posts:
10,236
Location:
Chicago, IL
The Chicago Bears wasted no time in moving from one franchise quarterback to the next. Jay Cutler, who was originally drafted by the Denver Broncos in 2006, spent the last eight years as the Bears’ starting quarterback. It was an emotional roller coaster, filled with stunning passes and equally as many frustrating interceptions. Although he battled constant injuries during his time as a Bear, Cutler was the most reliable player in Chicago for the better part of a decade. For better or for worse, the Bears always knew what they had at quarterback with Cutler at the helm.

A new era in Chicago has begun. Cutler finished the 2016 season with just five starts, the lowest mark in his career, due to a thumb injury and, later on, a torn labrum in his throwing shoulder. With a 34th birthday approaching and the uncertainty of a throwing shoulder injury, the Bears decided Cutler’s time was up and cut him on March 9th, 2017.

On that same day, former Tampa Bay Buccaneers backup quarterback Mike Glennon signed a three-year, $45 million contract with the Bears. Granted, there is a relatively cheap $6 million out that allows the Bears to cut Glennon after 2017, but regardless, it is a lucrative contract.

For six weeks, it was assumed the Bears would move forward with Glennon, as they retooled their franchise, similar to what the Kansas City Chiefs did with Alex Smith from 2013 to now. But then the NFL Draft rolled around on April 27th and the Bears pulled the first head-scratching move of the night. The Bears shipped off their third overall selection, a 2017 third-round pick, a 2017 fourth-round pick, and a 2018 third-round pick to swap picks with the San Francisco 49ers, who sat one spot above the Bears.

While the Bears were on the clock, chaos ensued. Were they moving up for Solomon Thomas? A quarterback? If so, which quarterback? It was the most suspenseful moment for the draft. Once the clock dwindled down, the Bears selected Mitchell Trubisky, quarterback, North Carolina. The Bears, unforeseen by most everyone, gave up half a draft’s worth of picks in order to jump one team and draft a quarterback who started for one season in college. It was an outrageous move in itself, never mind that Glennon was already on the roster.

Nevertheless, this is where the Bears are at now. They have two viable options at the quarterback position, both of whom are new to the team and required overspending in order to acquire them. They have different skill sets, but Bears offensive coordinator Dowell Loggains already dealt with that problem last year when it was Brian Hoyer and Matt Barkley who replaced an injured Cutler. If (or when, who knows with this franchise) Trubisky gets to play, molding the offense to his skill set and familiarities will be necessary. Let’s break down the move and see how Trubisky fits in Chicago…

Chicago’s Offense

Trubisky ran a shotgun-exclusive spread attack at North Carolina. The Tar Heels offense largely operated in 11 or 10 personnel (1 RB and 1 TE, 1 RB and 0 TE, respectively). On the ground, various zone concepts, including read-option, were the foundation of the Tar Heels’ offense. The passing attack was based around Run-Pass Options (RPOs), two-man route concepts in the quick game, and play-action to attack the intermediate and deep sections of the field. Structurally, it was similar to what other spread teams like Clemson were running.

Integrating more RPOs into the Bears offense would be a great benefit to Trubisky. The Oakland Raiders took that approach with Derek Carr, and the Tennessee Titans followed suit by doing the same with Marcus Mariota. RPOs give the quarterback the option to give the ball to the back for a run play or pull the ball and throw it, generally to a one-man route on the back side or to a screen on the boundary. It is a way to give the quarterback easy, familiar reads and help him adjust to the NFL.

Trubisky12.gif


Plays like this one were common for Trubisky’s North Carolina offense. In this instance, Trubisky is reading the drop safety, who is lined up about eight yards deep in between the left tackle and the wide receiver to that side of the field. As Trubisky reaches the ball into the running back’s belly, he has to determine whether or not that safety is crashing the run play or moving back into coverage. Trubisky reads the safety playing the run, pulls the ball, and fires a strike to his wide receiver

CHIO6.gif


The Bears ran a similar concept last season, though this is a pre-snap read rather than a post-snap read. With the tight end shifting before the snap, the quarterback is able to read that the defense is staying in a one-high coverage shell and loading the box with a safety, giving his wide receiver on the back side a 1-on-1 situation. The Bears would only have six blockers versus seven box defenders, making it extremely tough to run the ball. After processing all the information pre-snap, the quarterback is able to see that his best option is the back side 1-on-1. He fakes the hand off, pulls the ball, and hits the window between the cornerback and the safety. Incorporating a blend of these types of RPOs, as well as the ones Trubisky is more familiar with, would be ideal.

Luckily for Trubisky, the Bears offense ran a fair amount of the same passing concepts and formations that he did at North Carolina. Of course, Chicago was under center more often and ran some heavier personnel sets than Trubisky is used to, but what Chicago did out of shotgun should feel a bit familiar for the rookie.

CHIO1.gif


North Carolina ran concepts like this one while Trubisky was at the helm. Two of the same route being ran right next to each other versus zone coverage means that one of the receivers will influence a defender out of the way for the other receiver to be open. In this case, the Texans rotate to a Cover 2 look at the snap, giving the two receivers on the front side matched up against one shallow defender. The defender hangs tight to the inside receiver, leaving a weak spot in zone coverage for the outside receiver to get open near the boundary.

Trubisky is familiar with concepts like this one, where he is mostly just reading one section of the field post-snap. Trubisky has a good arm, a speedy release, and a quick enough trigger to be able to consistently make these concepts work.

CHIO3.gif


Isolating and catering to slot receivers is something Trubisky is also used to. North Carolina had a pair of solid slot receivers in Ryan Switzer (now a Dallas Cowboy) and Austin Proehl, and they made a point to isolate them and get those two into space. Here, Chicago motions an outside receiver into a tight doubles set with the slot receiver. As the outside receiver trots toward the slot receiver, the cornerback on that side backs off of the line of scrimmage and prepares to play vertical. The cornerback’s adjustment leaves a ten-yard weak spot outside of the numbers for the quarterback to throw into.

At North Carolina, Trubisky became well-versed in understanding if and when the slot receiver would be open on concepts like this one. Sometimes, the defense will bite hard on the short corner route and leave the ‘spot’ route over the middle wide open. Trubisky showed a proficiency to read half-field concepts like this one in order to make a quick decision and place an accurate throw.

There are some concepts that will be more difficult, though, and it will be interesting to see how Trubisky handles them. Chicago ran a number of option routes, play-action passes without a safety valve, and crowded middle of the field concepts. More of these concepts were ran when Cutler was the quarterback than they were when his backups were playing, but they were still apart of the offense to some degree for all of the quarterbacks.

CHIO4.gif


CHIO5.gif


This is the same play ran back-to-back. Pre-snap, the only difference is the alignment of the tight end. He is lined up with his hand in the dirt as an in-line player for the first play, while he is lined up just off the line in the second play. The tight end ran the same route on both plays, as did every other eligible receiver except for the wide receiver split out wide to the right.

The receiver on the right has an option route. Depending on the coverage and/or alignment of the cornerback, he will run one of a handful of different route options that are built into the play. Both the receiver and the quarterback have to read the same thing and be on page. It will take time for a rookie quarterback to build comfort and chemistry throwing option routes.

In the first play, the cornerback backs off of the receiver right before the snap and continues to drop into a ‘bail’ technique, where he is playing over the top and protecting a vertical push from the wide receiver. The receiver and the quarterback read the cornerback, allowing for the receiver to stop at about 12 yards and work back to the boundary near the first down marker.

The following play went differently. The cornerback is again playing the receiver outside-in, but he does not bail immediately. He hop steps with the receiver and tries to read his route on the fly. After a few steps, the receiver saw he had the inside track on the cornerback. Once he got even, he was leavin’. The receiver turned on the jets and booked it down the outside of the numbers. Although the receiver got a couple of steps on the cornerback, the quarterback was not able to fit the throw. The play design worked as planned, though.

Surrounding Talent

The Bears roster is not currently stocked to be able to throw effectively. Left tackle Charles Leno and right tackle Bobby Massie are replacement level tackles who aren’t going to be able to provide good protection on the outside. There also isn’t a true WR1 on the roster, seeing as Alshon Jeffrey left in free agency. Nobody on the roster can attract the type of attention Jeffrey did, nor can anyone on the roster provide Jeffery’s security blanket-type presence.

Kevin White is the best receiver on the roster right now. White, after missing his rookie season due to injury, played well in a WR2 role last year. He looked to be a solid vertical threat, though it’s tough to envision him evolving into a truly dynamic and game-changing player. Behind White is the trio of Eddie Royal, Kendall Wright, and Cameron Meredith. Much like White, they are all quality role players, but none of them really provide a dynamic presence that a quarterback can rely on.

At tight end, the Bears have Zach Miller, Dion Sims, and the newly drafted Adam Shaheen. None of those players are more than average receivers and they do not provide the type of vertical/horizontal threat that guys like Jordan Reed, Travis Kelce, and Delanie Walker can provide. The Bears tight ends are fine options in the short game and can double as solid blockers in the run game, but they are limited in what they can do as pass catchers.

On the other hand, running the ball won’t be a problem for Chicago. Left guard Josh Sitton, center Cody Whitehair, and right guard Kyle Long makes for a nasty interior offensive line. Now entering a second year together, the group should be even more in sync and provide rushing lanes for running back Jordan Howard. Howard, a day three pick in the 2016 NFL Draft, exploded onto the scene last season and finished as the second leading rusher in the NFL with 1,313 yards, trailing only Ezekiel Elliott. Jeremy Langford and Ka’Deem Carey remain on the roster as similar players to Howard, and Benny Cunningham and Tarik Cohen were recently acquired via free agency and the draft, respectively, to be ‘scat’ back weapons out of the backfield in the passing game. It’s unlikely all five stick on the roster, but regardless of who gets the boot, the Bears will have a thunder/lightning dynamic at running back.

Personnel has to play a part in putting together an offensive scheme. Coaches know they can’t run what their players can’t execute. For the Bears, that likely means fewer vertical plays. Jeffrey was the one dynamic receiver the Bears had and the lack of his presence will force OC Loggains to play “small ball” more than he may want. Again, Loggains already sort of did this when Hoyer and Barkley played, but Trubisky has a skill set closer to Cutler’s, so it’s frustrating the Bears don’t really have the personnel to play like they did with Cutler.

More than likely, the Bears will look to the ground game more, as well as try to do more bunch sets and quick game concepts to get the ball out quickly into space. They are going to have to sacrifice explosivity for efficiency, at least until Trubisky settles in and/or until the Bears can acquire a dynamic receiver again.

The Quarterback Himself

The second overall selection was a bit early for a player of Trubisky’s skill set and profile, but he was a fine prospect and the NFL’s infatuation with him wasn’t surprising. Trubisky, who will be a 23-year-old rookie with a lone year of collegiate starting experience under his belt, is an athletic, strong-armed passer who has a skill set that can be useful both inside and outside of the pocket. He has the athletic ability to be a scrambler, a designed runner, and be put on the move for rollouts, sprint outs, and boot-actions. Likewise, Trubisky has a strong arm that is amplified by a quick, malleable release. Trubisky has shown that he can make most any throw on the field, and do so from a number of different platforms.

Mechanically and mentally, Trubisky is a project. His footwork is often disjointed and sloppy when moving around in the pocket. At the top of his drop, Trubisky tends to “hop” and slowly widen his hips away from his target, leading him to have to make throws with his arm alone. Trubisky also tends to plant with an oddly wide base and, as a result, the ball ends up coming out a bit behind the rest of his torso.

Trubisky18.gif


Trubisky will have to show more purpose in his footwork than this. He made a poised, timely decision to move away from the interior pressure, but his feet were skipping around and getting tangled up throughout his slide away from the defender. Once he decided to throw, he hopped into a wide throwing platform instead of collecting himself and properly stepping into the throw. As a result of his loose footwork, Trubisky’s plant (front) foot landed wide of his midline, which makes his hip come around too early and leaves the ball to trail behind the rest of the body.

Trubisky13.gif


Pressure destroys Trubisky’s footwork. In fairness to him, every quarterback is more likely to falter under pressure, and Trubisky’s release is so compact and smooth that it allows him to throw off platform, but Trubisky too often abandons his feet in the pocket when he doesn’t need to. He has a wonderful feel for evading pass rushers, but he shows little comfort in throwing with defenders in his vicinity.

This should be a completion. The running back running the wheel route gets plenty of separation down the sideline and a throw in stride may have been enough to lead him into the end zone. Trubisky’s reaction to the defensive end pressuring his left tackle derailed the opportunity. Instead of shuffling his feet as the defensive end crept closer, Trubisky should have slid a bit to his right, reset, and ripped it down the field to the running back. Alas, Trubisky let the pressure frazzle him and he ended up trying to lob the throw off of his back foot.

As mentioned above, Trubisky does have a nice feel for getting away from pass rushers and making plays outside of the pocket, both as a mobile passer and as a runner. He is not scared to dance around the pocket and find the open play. Pass rushers may rattle Trubisky the Passer, but Trubisky the Runner is fearless.

Trubisky15.gif


The best way to utilize Trubisky is to let him get the ball out quickly or get him out of the pocket. Trubisky is most valuable as a short and intermediate passer, one who can be put on the move and be used as a legitimate part of the running game. He can throw strikes at the intermediate level, both to the boundary and over the middle of the field. Tight coverage does not force Trubisky to shy away. With his caliber of arm and confidence as a passer, Trubisky has the baseline skill set to be one of the better intermediate passers in the league.

Trubisky is not an impressive deep passer, unfortunately. His mechanics are too porous and balls beyond 20 yards often sail on him. North Carolina took a step back in 2016, partly due to Trubisky’s inability to push the ball down the field the same way Marquise Williams did before him. Without the ability to push the ball down the field, the Bears offense could become stagnant in a hurry, too.

Trubisky doesn’t have the mental prowess to be a dominant short and intermediate passer. He’s not a complete disaster, but he misses blatant pre-snap reads and is a tick too late in going through his progressions more often than would be desired of a top-three draft pick. Likewise, Trubisky’s progression style is rigid. He has moments where he will snap from one read to the next and, without thinking or reading the new progression, he will throw the ball without caution into coverage. Sometimes this works out for him, especially with the caliber of arm that he possesses, but the NFL won’t be so generous.

Trubisky17.gif


This is a careless pass that should have been intercepted. Trubisky could have thrown to the inside receiver who sat down in the middle of the Duke logo, but instead, he turned and fired at the outside receiver without taking inventory of that receiver being crowded by defenders. This throw either needs to happen sooner, to a different receiver, or not at all.

Granted, plenty of good quarterbacks have had similar tendencies in college. Jameis Winston, for instance, would trust what he saw pre-snap and make similar mistakes to the one above. The difference for Winston was that he was tasked with more from a mental processing standpoint than Trubisky was and Winston was right far more often than not. Winston’s aggression and stubbornness was a double-edged sword, but it benefited him in a way that Trubisky failed to match.

End Game

Having both Glennon and Trubisky on the roster is a gift and a curse. They have options at quarterback, but they either overpaid for a contingency plan (Glennon) or spent a handful of premium picks on a quarterback who wasn’t worth the price (Trubisky). If either quarterback turns out, the wasted value may not matter much. However, envisioning either player as a quarterback who can elevate the Bears offense is not easy.

Trubisky would have been better off being a secnd-round pick, like Derek Carr and Andy Dalton. Both of those quarterbacks fell to the second round, allowing their teams to grab elite players with their first round picks (Khalil Mack and A.J. Green, respectively). Trubisky’s skill set suggests he is a quarterback who will require a great deal of catering, patience, and personnel support. He feels more like a quarterback who a team can win with, not because of. Quarterbacks like that have value in the NFL, there is no doubt about that, but the value of that type of player does not align with the value it took to secure him.

Hopefully the Bears can find a way to restock the offense after the 2017 season. Trubisky, like any young quarterback, will need all the help he can get. If this works out for the Bears, they will be one of only a few lucky franchises who gets to transition immediately from one franchise quarterback to another.

http://twoqbs.com/qb-profiles/finding-the-fit-mitchell-trubisky-chicago-bears/
 

Da Coach

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
2,338
Liked Posts:
1,466
Location:
Helena MT
We did not give up "half of a drafts worth picks" for Trubisky.

The Bears shipped off their third overall selection, a 2017 third-round pick, a 2017 fourth-round pick, and a 2018 third-round pick to swap picks with the San Francisco 49ers, who sat one spot above the Bears.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,872
Liked Posts:
26,846
I get so tired of the "best way to use him as a passer is to get him out of the pocket" bullshit we sometimes hear about different QBs.

Its fucking dumb. How about just creating a pocket the QB can step into and WRs getting open on time?

The idea that rolling a QB out is the best way to use him is just dumb. It lines him to to take big shots, takes away his throwing base, and cuts the field in half. Sure, if your QB can roll out well, it can be a great asset to sprinkle in. But if you depend on that shit for success, you're in trouble.
 

Adipost

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
8,618
Liked Posts:
10,236
Location:
Chicago, IL
I get so tired of the "best way to use him as a passer is to get him out of the pocket" bullshit we sometimes hear about different QBs.

Its fucking dumb. How about just creating a pocket the QB can step into and WRs getting open on time?

The idea that rolling a QB out is the best way to use him is just dumb. It lines him to to take big shots, takes away his throwing base, and cuts the field in half. Sure, if your QB can roll out well, it can be a great asset to sprinkle in. But if you depend on that shit for success, you're in trouble.

I disagree as well. Trubisky has shown that he can maneuver and pass within a congested pocket.

https://mobile.twitter.com/cianaf/status/851071030462484480?lang=en
 

westcoast bear fanatic

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 11, 2014
Posts:
4,514
Liked Posts:
3,069
Trubisky looks like he could fit in a WC or Patriots type system. Bears run sort of a hybrid between the two. He has good accuracy, a strong enough arm, and a decent pair of wheels. The only system that wouldn't suit his strengths are a Pittsburgh/Cardinals deep ball Coryell type system.
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,721
I said a couple of times during the draft that based on what Loggains was running Trubisky was the best fit.

I think his ability to throw with timing and accuracy is what our system demands. There are a lot of intermediate option routes and quick throws.

If you can throw those with a little anticipation the oppurtunity to YAC yards is there.
 

BearsFan51

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 13, 2013
Posts:
9,247
Liked Posts:
4,727
It amuses me how entirely critical this article is of Trubisky and the Bears. This type of hit piece has been done already but in a much shorter form.

These types are always the most pathetic because you so clearly have a NFL draft media narrative of what a prospect should be and where he should be selected and when the actual experts disagrees with the media and draft that prospect later or earlier than anticipated the media launches into wildly defensive and critical articles of said prospect.

They give draft grades then start in with two bit analysis of a kid as if they're still the experts. It's a half assed attempt to still look smart despite being so wildly wrong.

Here's how easily wrong this article is. I posted early on a clip that came from the Twitter world that showed Trubisky throw a 40-yard pass on a rope to a receiver. Very little arc in the pass a straight bullet. The ability to do that shows Trubisky has tremendous arm strength. More than enough to succeed.

Secondly the idea that Trubisky struggles under pressure. PFF kept this stat and Trubisky had the highest completion percentage under pressure than any QB in the country from a year ago.

Additionally Trubisky had the highest rate of success on third down of any QB in the country. Success under pressure and success on third down are huge.
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
20,851
Liked Posts:
29,625
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
Realized this article lost all meaning after:
Cutler was the most reliable player in Chicago for the better part of a decade.
and
Kevin White is the best receiver on the roster right now. White, after missing his rookie season due to injury, played well in a WR2 role last year.

with more nonsense
The Bears shipped off their third overall selection, a 2017 third-round pick, a 2017 fourth-round pick, and a 2018 third-round pick to swap picks with the San Francisco 49ers, who sat one spot above the Bears.

It was an outrageous move in itself, never mind that Glennon was already on the roster.


Left tackle Charles Leno and right tackle Bobby Massie are replacement level tackles who aren’t going to be able to provide good protection on the outside.
 

Adipost

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
8,618
Liked Posts:
10,236
Location:
Chicago, IL
Realized this article lost all meaning after:

and


with more nonsense

Yeah, he went back and watched Bears games to see the type of offense they run. I'm assuming he did not watch all the games. Or he was impressed with White in the few games he played.
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,086
Liked Posts:
12,652
Realized this article lost all meaning after:

and


with more nonsense

Yeah, this article was not only elementary in an attempt to appear knowledgeable, but falls pretty fucking short of reality in many aspects.

I read the whole thing, gleamed nothing. Wouldn't advise others to read.
 

EL ROCKSTEADY

CBMB Refugee
Joined:
May 2, 2012
Posts:
880
Liked Posts:
206
Location:
Behind Enemy Lines
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
im going to make it much easier on everyone and say, west coast, run first offense.
 

Adipost

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2014
Posts:
8,618
Liked Posts:
10,236
Location:
Chicago, IL
Yeah, this article was not only elementary in an attempt to appear knowledgeable, but falls pretty fucking short of reality in many aspects.

I read the whole thing, gleamed nothing. Wouldn't advise others to read.

Aaron Leming tweeted out the link to this article. I don't agree with all of it, but there are some interesting tidbits.
 

iueyedoc

Variant Also Negotiates
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
20,851
Liked Posts:
29,625
Location:
Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
Calling Cutler reliable is as stupid as Trumps tweet that he is saving Americans money by vacationing in Bedminster. It's just opposite of factual.

I was never a Cutler hater, but please, he was probably the single most hot/cold QB in the NFL the past decade and he played in 16 games only 1 of 8 seasons in Chicago, so whatever aspect of him the author was referencing as reliable is just plain false, that isn't even opinion, it is a numerically verifiable fact.

re·li·a·ble
rəˈlīəb(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: reliable

1.
consistently good in quality or performance; able to be trusted.
"a reliable source of information"
synonyms: dependable,

What part of that definition reflects Cutler in the least. Hell, if he was constantly awful he could be called reliably bad, he was just all over the map, game to game quarter to quarter.
 

Mongo_76

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2013
Posts:
9,959
Liked Posts:
4,804
So much wrong with this article...

Including his breakdowns.
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,721
Charles Leno is better than replacment level.

For a 2nd straight year he gave the Bears consistent, not dominant, play at LT. He is going to give up a couple of sacks, but he is rarely beat clean off the edge.

He is closer to getting a contract extension than he is cut.
 

smilebit

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 16, 2012
Posts:
872
Liked Posts:
595
This article is full of shit really. I mean, who would believe that the Bears would've moved up one spot to get Solomon Thomas, who doesn't fit Fangio's 3-4 scheme at all. Everything I read on this guy points that he should've been taken in the mid rounds. I don't get the hype on Thomas. Secondly, if you're moving up one spot in the draft, you're definitely going for a qb. There wasn't a player worth moving up for that wasn't a qb, the only question was: was it going to be Trubisky or Watson. I'm honestly surprised the 49ers didn't take a qb with the qb's they have now. Also stated was that Trubisky should've been taken in the 2nd round, while that may be true, there was no way Watson or Trubisky were making it to the 2nd round. I'm not sure that many on this board believed that the Bears were going to roll out with Glennon as the starter with nobody in the reigns behind him. After getting rid of Cutler, Barkley and Hoyer there was no way he wasn't picking up someone in the draft.

It's frustrating to see these guys get all butt hurt that their mocks got messed up because the Bears moved up a spot and screwed up all their hard guess work, out of sheer boredom ffs, so they put this spin on it that the Bears gave up so much draft picks for a qb. No first or second round picks were given up to get Trubisky which is amazing when you look back at how many teams have given up so much for a qb. Pace knew who he wanted, got him and there isn't a price you can't pay for a qb if you believe he's going to be the one to define your career as a gm.
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
1,682
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Thanks for that post. It pretty much validates what I have been talking about regarding the decision to sign Glennon while drafting Trubisky. I just do not understand what in the hell Pace/Fox/Loggains et al are thinking about what kind of an offense they were planning to have. Glennon has NO SKILLS to run the kind of offense that the author alludes to in this piece. So what will the BEars do. Put in one offense for Glennon which entails a lot of ground pounding, screens, and dump-offs to keep Glennon upright, and another "future" set for Trubisky down the road?

My problem BTW is not Trubisky per se. My problem is the round peg in a square hoe approach by Pace and company. He makes no sense whatsoever.
 

The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2014
Posts:
18,007
Liked Posts:
1,682
Location:
Southern California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Charles Leno is better than replacment level.

For a 2nd straight year he gave the Bears consistent, not dominant, play at LT. He is going to give up a couple of sacks, but he is rarely beat clean off the edge.

He is closer to getting a contract extension than he is cut.


He is worse than replacement level and gets beat clean off of the edge by any lineman better than average. He is not strong enough to hold against power rushers and he constantly gets off balance against the speed guys.
 

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
37,895
Liked Posts:
43,086
For six weeks, it was assumed the Bears would move forward with Glennon, as they retooled their franchise, similar to what the Kansas City Chiefs did with Alex Smith from 2013 to now.

I like how they keep reporting this. It was only the clueless national media, who rarely have their finger of the pulse of specific teams to any degree of detail, that were assuming this. A significant portion of Bears fans figured Glennon to be a bridge QB, with the acquisition of a high draft pick imminent either this year or next.

The Alex Smith comparison is a bit crazy too. Smith was a seven year starter on a strong upswing coming off a career best season with a triple digit passer rating.
 

Top