Let's talk about the article. It mentioned that the sneak has a higher percentage chance of success than a running play (87.5% vs 68.75). They did have some commentary form Steeler OC Randy Fichtner that he doesn't like doing it in obvious situations, but then again the Pats always end up beating the Steelers when it matters and they have no issues with getting their 40 year old to do it, so maybe Fichtner should adjust a bit?
Anyway, I find it ironic that people are surprised that high end QBs get hurt and pretend this injury is so much different than Rodgers, Brady, Watson, etc.. of the previous years. It was a low percentage injury to his kneecap (which again I remind people that it's related to his hurt ankle).
If he was too hurt to play, then don't play him. If he's good to go, then let him play. Granted there are some things, like a sprint out naked boot that you probably don't want to run, but the reason why you don't is that his ankle has limited his ability to execute the play. In this situation he did convert, so he was able to execute, so there is no argument there.
People are making a big deal because they feel Mahomes' ankle injury should have prevented Reid from calling a successful 4th and 1 play that also ended in an unrelated injury. It was a good play call. Bad result for Mahomes, but would it have been better if he got hurt in the pocket where he's been already hurt numerous times this season?
Anyway, people were excited to see Mahomes and now they will have to wait. That frustration is coming out in a period-laced rage that the successful play call wasn't right? Okay. Whatever.