MACK?

Sparks500

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2014
Posts:
2,476
Liked Posts:
2,176
If only we had that money we sent to the TV preacher that was screwing the hockey player....
 

run and shoot

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
15,983
Liked Posts:
3,255
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
You guys are looking at it from a biased point and I'm not sure why. You are mad at the side


that contains the points of the other team and not the side that should be scoring OUR points. They have kept most teams to a minimal score and We have ZERO offense to counter that. Do you expect them to pitch shutouts for 60 minutes so we can be undefeated from FGs?


THIS !!
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
33,787
Liked Posts:
-1,061
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
57,795
Liked Posts:
37,727
Actually, I was the one saying that I doubted we would win in New Orleans even last year after we lost to Philly. You were the one saying we would win.

At the time, yes. Entering year 4, it was a good trade. So I can't fault them for it. We are asked "knowing what we know now". It's a hypothetical argument.

You were saying not to worry about losing because this would be the year to compete. I was saying gotta take advantage while you can which we didn't.

The answer to the hypo is still to take Mack because once again most 1st round picks never reach his level. We are closer to be contenders with him than with 2 unknown draft picks and with the cap we need to take advantage in next few years.

Unless you talking about starting a new rebuild and trading all our good players it makes no sense. Guys like Hicks are not getting any younger.
 

Top