Move Seabrook to Forward? Rockford?

Raskolnikov · Jul 17, 2019

If you don't trade Gus,

and KK outperforms Seabrook,

perhaps its time to see how long before Seabrook waives the NMC from the press box or from Rockford. Call his bluff.

Or...is it time to move Seabrook into your fourth line with Smith/Carpenter? Real heavy line.

ZOMBIE@CTESPN · Jul 17, 2019

Based on Bowman’s comments it’s not seabrook fault but it’s the talent he is playing with fault

Imo he should be getting the huet treatment

MassHavoc · Jul 17, 2019

Stop with this stupidity. He's not going to forward. They'd eat his salary in the box before he goes to forward. If he can't beat KK for defensive time, what in the hell makes you think he could beat any of our true 4th line forwards for playing time.

anotheridiot · Jul 17, 2019

MassHavoc said:
Stop with this stupidity. He's not going to forward. They'd eat his salary in the box before he goes to forward. If he can't beat KK for defensive time, what in the hell makes you think he could beat any of our true 4th line forwards for playing time.

6.8 million dollars a year.

MassHavoc · Jul 17, 2019

anotheridiot said:
6.8 million dollars a year.

So? If you can't trade it, and you can't play it. what else you going to do? You can't put a player out there who is hurting the team and there are better players just becuase you made the stupid move of signing him for 30 years.

mikita's helmet · Jul 17, 2019

Now, noe

MassHavoc said:
So? If you can't trade it, and you can't play it. what else you going to do? You can't put a player out there who is hurting the team and there are better players just becuase you made the stupid move of signing him for 30 years.

now, now it was only 20, enough of the hyperbole.

anotheridiot · Jul 17, 2019

MassHavoc said:
So? If you can't trade it, and you can't play it. what else you going to do? You can't put a player out there who is hurting the team and there are better players just becuase you made the stupid move of signing him for 30 years.

you dont have to argue with me over it, I think he deserves to get the A ripped off and let Kane have it for good. Now they are talking about how they got a real leader from Ottawa. The fuck do we need more leaders for? They claimed Kunitz was a leader last year. Toews, Keith, Kane, Seabroke, get to the point you need followers too.

I kind of find it funny that after two years of saying FU to waiving the no move clause, AA gets shipped to Ottawa. What hell could they send Broke to?

ZOMBIE@CTESPN · Jul 17, 2019

MassHavoc said:
So? If you can't trade it, and you can't play it. what else you going to do? You can't put a player out there who is hurting the team and there are better players just becuase you made the stupid move of signing him for 30 years.

You hide it like we did to the other disaster huet

BlackHawkPaul · Jul 18, 2019

anotheridiot said:
you dont have to argue with me over it, I think he deserves to get the A ripped off and let Kane have it for good. Now they are talking about how they got a real leader from Ottawa. The fuck do we need more leaders for? They claimed Kunitz was a leader last year. Toews, Keith, Kane, Seabroke, get to the point you need followers too.

I kind of find it funny that after two years of saying FU to waiving the no move clause, AA gets shipped to Ottawa. What hell could they send Broke to?

He would have to go to a team that is trying to meet the cap floor, but a team he agrees to go to. You have to look at it all ways. 7 is on the decline, but why would he want to go to an Arizona type team just to accidentally make the playoffs before retirement? The Blackhawks gave him this nutbag contract with the hope the salary cap was going to be 100 million before 2017.
Plus the whole idea of pulling a Buff isn't going to work for Seabs.
The plus side is that I don't see a removal of the A, just because if 19 wasn't here, 7 would be the captain hands down. His leadership alone counts for something.

ZOMBIE@CTESPN · Jul 18, 2019

BlackHawkPaul said:
He would have to go to a team that is trying to meet the cap floor, but a team he agrees to go to. You have to look at it all ways. 7 is on the decline, but why would he want to go to an Arizona type team just to accidentally make the playoffs before retirement? The Blackhawks gave him this nutbag contract with the hope the salary cap was going to be 100 million before 2017.
Plus the whole idea of pulling a Buff isn't going to work for Seabs.
The plus side is that I don't see a removal of the A, just because if 19 wasn't here, 7 would be the captain hands down. His leadership alone counts for something.

He would save money in income taxes maybe lol

Raskolnikov · Jul 18, 2019

BEARZOMBIE said:
He would save money in income taxes maybe lol

Yeah, send him to the Florida Panthers or Dallas Stars to save millions in taxes, and he will waive that NMC quick...

mikita's helmet · Jul 19, 2019

anotheridiot said:
I kind of find it funny that after two years of saying FU to waiving the no move clause, AA gets shipped to Ottawa. What hell could they send Broke to?

Maybe Vancouver or Seattle.

Sure he wouldn't mind retiring in his hometown if a deal can be made that works for both teams.

No state income tax in Washington, close to Vancouver. They could leave him available for the draft. Not sure how that would work with a no-trade clause (may not have been addressed/discussed/considered in his K, a possible loophole), and Seattle's new GM, Ron Francis, might want a veteran with Cup experience. ...maybe not.

Raskolnikov · Jul 19, 2019

I guess, I was just curious for discussion. I didn't want to disrespect the guy, its actually a testament to his offensive skills that I wanted to consider

Carpenter-Smith-Seabrook

as a potential thing. Hahaha

I'm sorry. The dope probably went a bad way there. Head down. Walk of shame.

bamainatlanta · Jul 20, 2019

Gotta love stupid off-season threads.

MassHavoc · Jul 20, 2019

Move Crawford to center. If Toews can play with concussions there so can he.

ytsejam · Jul 20, 2019

MassHavoc said:
Move Crawford to center. If Toews can play with concussions there so can he.

Ice crew girl with the biggest tits goes in net.

LordKOTL · Jul 22, 2019

BEARZOMBIE said:
You hide it like we did to the other disaster huet

Can't do that anymore. If Seabrook goes to the A or overseas we still got almost 5.8M in dead cap--and since his NMC is an NMC, he can't be demoted as such without his consent.

I think Seabs and Keith are virtually untouchable in this regard, even though Keith's also a recapture. They'll play as long as they want to play and as long as the coach/GM lets them. Since Keith's recapture goes up to about 4M max I seriously doubt the 'hawks will eat it. While with Seabrook the question will be potential compliance buy-out, vs. him retiring and leaving cash on the table, vs. going on LTIR. I doubt any GM with a brain goes normal buy-out and having 6.7M in dead cap next season (especially with the looking Debrincat deal) and in 2023...not to mention 5 years of his buyout cap (even if it's sub-1M) on the books until 2029.

If I was a betting man, I'd be going the Compliance Buy-out or LTIR as a way to get him off the balance sheet.

mikita's helmet · Jul 23, 2019

ytsejam said:
Ice crew girl with the biggest tits goes in net.

Can't wait to eat her five hole!

Raskolnikov · Jul 23, 2019

mikita's helmet said:
Can't wait to eat her five hole!

and her 6

MassHavoc · Jul 24, 2019

Well that went weird fast

Move Seabrook to Forward? Rockford?

CCS Donator

Well-known member

Moderator

Well-known member

Moderator

CCS Donator

Well-known member

Well-known member

Fartbarf

Well-known member

CCS Donator

CCS Donator

CCS Donator

You wake him up, you keep him up

Moderator

CCS Donator

Scratched for Vorobiev

My favorite teams

CCS Donator

CCS Donator

Moderator