Those are your words though, not mine.
I guess I'll have to report your sick threats that you made and repeatedly conceded responsibility for, that you keep spoofing were said by me.
Please keep your sick threats, and homophobic slurs out of this board, thank you.
Preston isn't actually all that good. His PFF grade is 68 and he only has 47 combined pressures. His run blocking (55 grade) and coverage abilities (47) are also actually quite shit. His pass rush grade is 76
By contrast Mack 61 total pressures with a run grade of 82, pass rush of 86 and a coverage grade of 66. So pretty much better than Preston all around with an overall grade of 89.4
You case for Za'Darius is better as he has 72 total pressures with a run grade of 73, pass rush of 87 and coverage grade of 79. His overall grade is also 89 like Mack.
In short, Mack and Za'Darius are elite all around players while Preston just seems to be benefiting from playing with Za'Darius.
The further point is Bears already got 2 years of elite play out of Mack as his overall grade last year was 90. So the 2 Smiths need to prove they can replicate this production next year before you can claim they are on the level of Mack. Based on the numbers, I suspect Za'Darius may be able to replicate this production for a 2nd year but Preston is likely to regress as his raw numbers look good but the underlying data suggests he simply has gotten lucky this year.