Well you have Trump and the crazy guy agreeing with you. That’s about right.
Let me know when teams in other sports can win a championship by winning three games.
When Jordan was playing in the NBA there were multiple teams that had two and in some cases three dominant/hall of fame type players.
Also, do you really think it’s tougher to win a title in Football than Baseball?
Um, cool? You have no one agreeing with you, which sounds about right. You seem to be confusing historical franchise success with actual dynasties. If that's what we're talking about, then Yankees win hands down. Hell, Patriots aren't even the greatest franchise in their own sport. But it isn't. We're talking about periods of dominance. And if you take the time to look up any recent articles on the subject, the consensus tends to have the exact same opinion as I.
And as far as baseball, it is much tougher now that the league has been trying to add parity, which is why the Yankees have only won once since the late 90s/00 when they were able to simply stack their teams with the best players by outspending everyone. If they added a hard cap like the NFL, I doubt you see the type of maintained dominance as the patriots have had. And before you bother, I know the Yankees built a great farm system in that time. It's nice that baseball allows teams to develop players without actual detriment to the major League team. Imagine being able to do that in football.
Going to college. You get to recruit the best players, and the best schools tend to have an advantage with that. Imagine if Belichick could go out and recruit the best players for his NFL squad, as opposed to being on the back end of the draft for 20 seasons.
As for the bulls, it lasted eight seasons. We're talking almost twenty years of outright dominance by the patriots with constant roster turnover. One of the players when they started their run is now a coach. The Bulls had a great run, one of the best, but once they turned over the roster, it was over. And basketball is ridiculous anyway. You can look at every few years and watch teams dominate for a decent period, and the second three peat for the Bulls really was against a watered down league with the expansion. That said, this is the dynasty I think challenges the Patriots most, simply because they never lost, and it was more of a modern era. But, for one, it's basketball, and two, the Patriots are doing it in a league and era that is designed to prevent this very thing from happening.
And finally, if you ever gave belichick a best of 5-7 game series to prepare for a team, which completely would eliminate any kind of luck factor, I seriously doubt they'd ever lose. Do you honestly think one and done is more beneficial than a seven game series? If basketball were one and done, the Bulls win two championships.