- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 58,090
- Liked Posts:
- 38,102
So by your logic all offense can be judged based soley on total yards and points meaning you consider the 2013 Bears, the only one you credit Kromer for coordinating, as being better than the Redskins during the Gibbs Hogs era, many of the Walsh/Siefert 49ers, all of the Bradshaw Steelers teams, the Johnson era Cowboys and better than or near identical to every New England SB championship offense? I simply have no way to respond to that.
This has got to be the single stupidest post I have every seen, besting your already champion Trubisky had the advantage in learning fundamentals over Watson by not getting to play or getting practice reps for 3 years mind number.
No I am saying trying to bridge the gap between eras is problematic. I expect we will just argue over how much of an adjustment to make. I think the substance of the point being made is that Kromer's O was pretty good as evidenced by your inability to find any examples in the same era.
It is also evidence by his 2013 season besting Nagy's in terms of points and yards but I know you will continue to run from that fact because it doesn't help your point. I will repeat again. 2013 Kromer had more points and yards and 2018 Nagy.
Also, when you asked, I said we can include 2014 hence my question about finding 2 years of other Bears Offenses that match up to 2013 and 2014. It is like you want to relitigate things I already conceded for purposes of debate which just speaks to your saltiness. As does you trying to bring up unrelated shit from 2 years ago.
Yeah with him going completely 13 Monkeys ape shit crazy essentially saying Kromer led a better offense than historical dynasties basing every thing on raw yards and points , I am going to pass the baton. You up?
This was never said. Nice strawman.