- Joined:
- Nov 29, 2014
- Posts:
- 15,547
- Liked Posts:
- 18,434
- Location:
- Texas
his foot is clearly on the goal line, his own momentum is going backwards should have been 2 points. Oh and check out Quinn blowing up that line.
Right, which his own momentum trying to run away from Nichols was in the end zone.
When he's first contacted the ball is outside the goal line. That's all that matters.
Right, which his own momentum trying to run away from Nichols was in the end zone.
When he's first contacted the ball is outside the goal line. That's all that matters.
Ball on the goal line = not a safety. It has to be 100% behind at the forward progress spot for it to be a safety.To me it looks like he's stepping back and trying to break away from Nichols and the ball crosses the goal line. Even 'in the grasp rule' his back foot is in the end zone and the ball is on the goal line. Look at 75 doing his best Charles Leno impersonation
View attachment 7739
Refs are going to give him a lot of leeway over a single "step" - for all you know he was trying to brace his fall from being sacked. With that said, they got a pretty generous spot with the ball - it shouldn't have been a safety but it should have been marked at "inches" away from goal line. Those shit refs marked the ball like 1 and a half yards out of the endzone though.
Because the ball was over the goal line when his forward momentum was stopped. It's the ball, not the foot.-
his foot is clearly on the goal line, his own momentum is going backwards should have been 2 points. Oh and check out Quinn blowing up that line.
To me it looks like he's stepping back and trying to break away from Nichols and the ball crosses the goal line. Even 'in the grasp rule' his back foot is in the end zone and the ball is on the goal line. Look at 75 doing his best Charles Leno impersonation
View attachment 7739