๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿˆ OFFICIAL ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿˆ NFL WEEK 1 IGT

aaronitout

Active member
3,746
-509
30
But he doesnโ€™t and Rodgers has been a failure the majority of his career. Sure his individual stats are great and he will be a HOF QB but rings are more important.

So you admit that if Rodgers had Brady-shaw's teams he would have even more rings by now. Thank you. This means Rodgers is better.

Rings are a team measure..who would rather have the lesser QB who only has more rings because he is on better teams? Playing better while on significantly worse teams is even more proof that the better player is better lol.

Playing the best means you are the best, even if your team doesn't do the same /discussion
 

aaronitout

Active member
3,746
-509
30
if I'm understanding this correctly, you're saying the Packers defense was good, but Tom Brady scored more points to win the game?

@aaronitout .. your arguments, please stop. and go away.

No.

The Buccaners defense was significantly better then the Packers and bailed out Brady's vastly inferior QB play.

Brady scored 21 points, just like Rodgers. But Brady had THREE picks to Rodgers ONE.

Math is good.
 

mecha

Well-known member
7,598
4,588
70
who fucking cares? they not only beat the Packers, they squashed the vaunted Mahomes offense too. they won the Super Bowl. your commentary on the subject is irrelevant. Rodgers has been touted as the greatest ever at the position for over a decade, if he was so vastly superior to the competition he'd have more than 1 ring. oh that's right, he just kept taking giant contracts while Brady let the team spread the money around to produce a balanced team.

do you comprehend the vast contrast between the two players? the Bears don't play the Packers for awhile, go to your home now.
 

Chicagosports89

Well-known member
5,014
4,952
70
I think the difference is Brady motivates and coaches up teammates because he gives a shit. Rodgers is busy moping around, he's basically a cutler personality that drags the morale down. But at least @aaronitout agrees the packers are a shit organization that failed Rodgers and Favre.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
5,101
3,329
70
So you admit that if Rodgers had Brady-shaw's teams he would have even more rings by now. Thank you. This means Rodgers is better.

Rings are a team measure..who would rather have the lesser QB who only has more rings because he is on better teams? Playing better while on significantly worse teams is even more proof that the better player is better lol.

Playing the best means you are the best, even if your team doesn't do the same /discussion
No Iโ€™m not admitting that. Would he have a better chance, sure but we have no idea what the outcome would be. And Rodgers isnโ€™t better based on hypotheticals. Hahaha thatโ€™s the stupidest comment Iโ€™ve ever heard.

Justin Fields is better than Aaron Rodgers because he has a chance to win more Super Bowls than Rodgers.
 

JesusHalasChrist

Neg it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Donator
7,454
10,529
70
How funny would it be if an embittered Aaron Rodgers was actively sabotaging Green Bay's season but still made the playoffs because he is in the same division as the Lions and Bears?
 

DaaBears

CCS Donator
Donator
8,751
8,796
70
Aaron Rodgers 14 years as a starter, has been to the same amount of Super Bowls as Rex Grossman. You can make excuses for a game or a season, but not 14 seasons. That's math and common sense.
 

Chicagosports89

Well-known member
5,014
4,952
70
Aaron Rodgers 14 years as a starter, has been to the same amount of Super Bowls as Rex Grossman. You can make excuses for a game or a season, but not 14 seasons. That's math and common sense.
Weather mustve happened in the other 13 seasons. Brady has never had weather to deal with though
 

Top