2017 draft do over.

Starion

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 29, 2012
Posts:
4,220
Liked Posts:
2,669
Location:
Fort Myers, FL
Doing just a Bears re-draft:

RD1[3] Mahommes
RD2[45] Juju
RD3[67] Kamara
RD4[112] Jackson
RD 4[119] Kittle

That draft along with the Mack trade would’ve made this team a dynasty.

This is assuming Bears are the only ones with the phone booth time machine & knowledge of future.

1589409474679.png

With that, they could kill it in FA and NOT re-up Leno & Massie too. Major additions by subtraction there in $$ saved & talent gained in their places.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
33,989
Liked Posts:
-962
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
So how far does Trubisky fall?

3rd round for a bottom five starter and good back up?

That's a good question and i'd actually be pretty curious to see where he would go to see if another team saw enough in him to think he could be a starting QB in the NFL. Nagy doesn't want to use him as a starting QB that could get shit done with his legs as well as throwing while on the run but maybe other head coaches would.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
44,471
Liked Posts:
39,018
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
With hindsight in a re-draft Jackson gets taken before both Adams and Lattimore IMO.


Doing just a Bears re-draft:

RD1[3] Mahommes
RD2[45] Juju
RD3[67] Kamara
RD4[112] Jackson
RD 4[119] Kittle

That draft along with the Mack trade would’ve made this team a dynasty.
So which Jackson is picked at #112?

Also, love the idea that in hindsight Jackson is the first safety gone, but in hindsight Kittle still goes #119.

Pick a lane partner.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
17,975
Liked Posts:
19,685
Location:
MICHIGAN
With hindsight in a re-draft Jackson gets taken before both Adams and Lattimore IMO.


Doing just a Bears re-draft:

RD1[3] Mahommes
RD2[45] Juju
RD3[67] Kamara
RD4[112] Jackson
RD 4[119] Kittle

That draft along with the Mack trade would’ve made this team a dynasty.

I was going by op criteria. One things for sure allot of stars came out of this draft and it was dubbed a shitty draft at the time especially qb position lol
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,816
Liked Posts:
35,721
I am going to go a little outside the box here...

Mitch Trubisky, QB, UNC
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,445
Liked Posts:
17,163
Myles Garrett could have murdered Mason Rudolph and I would have still picked him in that scenario.

I'm drafting John Ross.

Imagine what nagy could do with that speed!
 

PrideisBears

Bully Mod
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Jun 20, 2010
Posts:
38,289
Liked Posts:
32,934
Location:
In the mod forum planning your ban
Both mahomes and watson are gone? Only one thing left to do









Cry
 

wazzupi

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 9, 2016
Posts:
4,393
Liked Posts:
1,621
That doesn't make much sense. If it's a redraft then the teams know how the players turn out. So San Francisco would probably stay with Garoppolo. Which means Watson falls to us. Then do as Milky suggests. Boom - super bowl.
watson will never win a superbowl.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
17,635
Liked Posts:
3,582
Simple question, if it is a do-over for 2017, does that mean we can NOT sign Glennon as well?

Save the 18 mil on Glennon...roll it over
Pick CMc,
trade second rounder for Jimmy G.
still sign Mack in 2018.
 

coolio

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 4, 2019
Posts:
705
Liked Posts:
514
Simple question, if it is a do-over for 2017, does that mean we can NOT sign Glennon as well?

Save the 18 mil on Glennon...roll it over
Pick CMc,
trade second rounder for Jimmy G.
still sign Mack in 2018.
Or draft myles garrett save the two first round picks trade a 2nd for jimmy g and draft josh jacobs in 2018
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
17,635
Liked Posts:
3,582
Or draft myles garrett save the two first round picks trade a 2nd for jimmy g and draft josh jacobs in 2018
It's a draft do-over for 2017 not a draft do-over for 2017 and 2018.
 

Natedogg8023

Active member
Joined:
Nov 5, 2012
Posts:
365
Liked Posts:
121
Location:
Formerly WV now Colorado Springs
This would of been the new Last Dance type documentary in 20 yrs....


QUOTE="Milky, post: 3369973, member: 8758"]
With hindsight in a re-draft Jackson gets taken before both Adams and Lattimore IMO.


Doing just a Bears re-draft:

RD1[3] Mahommes
RD2[45] Juju
RD3[67] Kamara
RD4[112] Jackson
RD 4[119] Kittle

That draft along with the Mack trade would’ve made this team a dynasty.
[/QUOTE]
 

Chicago Staleys

Realist
Joined:
Sep 24, 2012
Posts:
12,885
Liked Posts:
8,602
Simple question, if it is a do-over for 2017, does that mean we can NOT sign Glennon as well?

Save the 18 mil on Glennon...roll it over
Pick CMc,
trade second rounder for Jimmy G.
still sign Mack in 2018.

We???

When did you become a Bears fan??
 

Milky

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
3,371
Liked Posts:
3,643
So which Jackson is picked at #112?

Also, love the idea that in hindsight Jackson is the first safety gone, but in hindsight Kittle still goes #119.

Pick a lane partner.

I suppose that’s a little confusing

In a complete re-draft Eddie Jackson is the 1st DB taken IMO.

After I made that statement I purposed a Bears only re-draft. Not the entire league but what the Bears could’ve done with their picks with who was still available at each pick.

Two different scenarios each with one lane.
 
Last edited:

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
33,989
Liked Posts:
-962
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
It's a draft do-over for 2017 not a draft do-over for 2017 and 2018.

Actually it started as a draft do over for who the Bears would pick with the 3rd pick if Mahomes and Watson went 1 and 2, but it's been made into much more of course which is fine cause it gives us more to talk about.
 

Top