Thats arguable. They had more production in college.
That still doesn't explain why you believe he can't do what they do in this scheme, other than him being drafted by the bears.
If he got drafted by the Packers everyone would be saying he's the next great TE. Its a double standard.
The guy is still an athletic freak for his size, and has shown to have great hands. Yea, he's raw, but he's got heavy potential.
No I already explained it.
Kelce flat out better prosepct.
Ertz was a more polished route runner and got in and out of routes quicker. Kmet is almost a half second slower in 3 cone.
Now Kmet has tools to develop but now I would put his ceiling at a Mertellus Bennet level not Kelce or Ertz.
Ertz was a better route runner. Your link says he struggles getting into routes but once he gets up to speed he is good. That is also evident in his 3 cone.
Kelce and Ertz were both better and smoother route runners. That is evident in as I said Ertz running the 3 cone almost a half second faster.
In short, Kelce and Ertz were both smooth runners with good change of direction. Kmet is a bit more of a lumber athlete which makes sense as he has anywhere from 10-20 pounds on then.
Put another way Kelce and Ertz were move TEs good enough to play inline. Kmet is a inline TE good enough to play some move TE.
Not sure what more you want me to say or you just trying to be argumentative.