- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 18,644
- Liked Posts:
- 7,652
- Location:
- Forest Park
My favorite teams
Discuss Cubs-related trade stuff in here:
Realistically they won't contend in 2022Swear I call it like it is. This team is not in the same situation at 2012. It was so obvious that anyone could have seen it.
But no. burn it. Trash it all. Etc etc.
The Cubs generate 500M per year. They can support a 200M team. The only reason why payroll went down was COVID killing the revenues. That is why Darvish was traded. It was not to bring back 2012 baby. It was to make the team fiscally responsible.
I would call it conservative values. Other teams figured short term loss means long term gain and plowed ahead. Those team are getting pay off for their aggressive behavior.
So in view of this lets call a spade a spade.
They will sell short term players.
They will reload.
They will contend in 2022.
End of story.
Why not?Realistically they won't contend in 2022
You do realize that none of this will ever happen and they likely will have some metrics telling them who to sign that can be held, if they are good, and flipped if they are bad.Why not?
Cubs tax:
2021: 173,065,000 (#11)
2020: 216,269,251 (#3)
2019 237,199,519 (#2)
2018 193,316,649 ((#5)
2017 183,310,943 (#9)
2016 205,917,980 (#4)
2015 154,907,624 (10)
So if we have learned anything about the Ricketts is they will spend because they are cash cows.
2022 58,125,000 in tax hits.
Amazing how that works.
So Jed has money to burn. Like 142Mil to be exact. And from what we have seen from above 200M is by no means the spending limit. No it is a bit higher.
But to just be fair with this lets say 140M will be spent towards a reload and that includes retention. 120M is a fair statement here.
Now they will need a SS.
A 3B
a 1B
2 SP
Some will come internal. Some will come external.
Now lets play with the Lynn and Rondon idea for argument sake.
Lynn made 10M and is putting up cy-young levels at 35. He may want a bit of security from 36- so I could see him wanting a 3 year deal. He is a bit of a work horse so he will most likely at worse be a innings soaker. At best a TOR.
Rondon is a bit of a risk going in and I would have innings clauses going in. bonus and guarantee opt years. Give him a opt out after 2 because if he stays the coarse he could get a better offer.
Long story short they will cost 15M each. 30 Mil invested. Might have some perks that pop it up to 40M.
80M to play with. Hmmm need a SS. Seager looks pretty sexy right now there. 25M spent.
55M to invest.
1B well a few ways to go about this.
#1 internal. Let Wisdom take over. 43% SO rate and a late bloomer? Pass.
Outside of the box? Sign Conforto to play LF and move Joc to 1B. Platoon with Wisdom. Maybe.
Safe pick: Resign Rizzo. 22M AAV
23M left to spend. Need a 3B.
Internal Wisdom see above.
Cheap: Duffy. Not a bad option at all. 5-6M
Kyle Seager just for the Seager brothers on the left side fun. 14M
If it gets Seager it would be worth it IMO and invest the rest into the pen. Start Lynn, Hendricks, Rondon, Mills and Alzolay. Last guy really needs to figure out that 2nd pitch vs lefties before I get feel goods on him. But they have 3 guys that can start MLB ready.
You do realize that none of this will ever happen and they likely will have some metrics telling them who to sign that can be held, if they are good, and flipped if they are bad.
I could see them signing one or two big free agents because they have the money. But the rest will likely be guys we aren't even thinking of right now.
Yeah I think this is not 2012 means it won't take 4 years and the team won't be an absolute dumpster fire, but next year in all likelihood will still be a transition year. Bringing in solid players that are short term fillers that can be flipped (Verlander, Lynn, Greinke, Scherzer, Kluber) and maybe one or two long term pieces but I expect more long term money to be spent in 23 and 24 to fill in holes as the next wave of kids is filtering up.If you read what Jed said.
This is not 2012. Which means we are not signing guys to flip.
So I get what peeps want. But sorry have to hit it with the nope stick.
I wouldn’t let Hoyer spend any money just look at the track record he and Theo had during the contending years. Not very pretty.
Yeah I think this is not 2012 means it won't take 4 years and the team won't be an absolute dumpster fire, but next year in all likelihood will still be a transition year. Bringing in solid players that are short term fillers that can be flipped (Verlander, Lynn, Greinke, Scherzer, Kluber) and maybe one or two long term pieces but I expect more long term money to be spent in 23 and 24 to fill in holes as the next wave of kids is filtering up.
That quote fits what I said. More of a retool than rebuild. Still could have some down time though
I think Davies will be gone for whatever they can get to someone who needs rotation depth, maybe even SD. Chafin will undoubtedly pique interest. Maybe Tepera or Winkler. Someone would have to blow them away for Hendricks, like a quintana level offer. Contreras I would imagine would be looking at an even bigger offer to get him. I don't think anyone is off the table though. Hoerner would be the closest to untouchable.I would take it at face value.
How about this:
Cubs trade Bryant and Kimbrel to the Sox for Vaughn and 2 pitchers, Eloy is starting a rehab assignment right now. I would expect a bit of DH for him. Bryant replaces Vaughn in LF.
Cubs also pick up Matthew Thompson and Andrew Dalquist. Both are A ball or lower RHP.
Vaughn fixes the 1B problem going forward, Pitching is always needed.
With 1B filled Jed shops Rizzo. Red Sox seem like a potential spot for him. Red sox are RH dominate. Rizzo would be a upgrade for a contender.
Chris Murphy. LHP as a return.
Baez would be a hard sale. He is a bit of a reach and 2nd fiddle to Trevor Story. The losers in that battle might knock on Jed's door then.
That is what I would expect out of the deadline. The draft will come first and is far more interesting on what direction they go.