didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,326
- Liked Posts:
- 9,922
And I agree on all of that basically.No I acknowledge you think he isn't that good. I simply am saying no knows that for sure and Bears aren't good enough to be unwilling to take that risk. I also think the downside is small as they will still make money and they are already a laughing stock so they aren't really going to sink much lower if it fails.
Furthermore, 2:1 60% and 7 ypa is good enough to get it done if your D is elite. That is the point. He may not work for a team with a shitty D but he has already proven he can take a team with an elite D to the SB. Again there is no guarantee he can replicate it but there is also no guarantee he cannot so the question for me is less about Kap and more about whether the Bears are good enough to not take that chance or if they have a better solution. I think the answer to both questions is no at this present time.
And quite frankly 2018 Trubs if he didn't stop running is good enough to win with. The issue with Trubs is once he stopped running after the shoulder injury he became less effective. But if you have a QB that is a decent enough passing who also ran for 507 yards and 4 TDs in 6 career playoff games, that is more than enough to win with. At his best and healthiest he was in fact Lamar Jackson lite and with 3 years to recover, I think there is enough of a chance he can be again to take the risk. I understand if others disagree but just trying to make clear that it is very much debatable rather than a forgone conclusion that there is zero chance of him being a productive QB still.
Where you and I disagree is if the NFL basically ORDERED teams not to sign him. No, I think teams made their own decision and in some cases it was the wrong decision. The league might have encouraged teams not to sign him, but I don't think they prohibited them.
I also don't think he has the desire to play from the reasons I already said.