WestCoastBearsFan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 25, 2017
- Posts:
- 16,867
- Liked Posts:
- 12,063
My favorite teams
Cole Kmet was on the field for 100% of the offensive snaps!
i wasn’t super fixated on him but he seemed solid enough in the run gameThat's good to see, he didn't get much work yesterday in the passing game (only threw it 21 times anyways) so I can't fan-boy out, but he made some nice blocks and stuff. He's a reliable player.
Excited to see how he progresses in year 2.
He made a key block on the 2nd level on Monty's 2nd TD.i wasn’t super fixated on him but he seemed solid enough in the run game
Tannehill is probably a better runner than Trubisky right now, all things considered. He scores a lot with his legs, one of the more underrated red zone weapons in the NFL today is Ryan Tannehill on the ground.As a general note on the offense: I don't see why they can't play a TEN style, that's basically what they have going now. Derrick Henry and the oline is the engine of the offense, he gets over 20 carries a game, and that really opens up the PA for Tannehill (where he's great and does a lot of damage).
Obviously Mitch doesn't have the kind of deep ball that Tannehill has (he's got beautiful touch), but Trubisky is more mobile and is more of a threat getting on the edge and running (he had 8 rushes yesterday).
I'm not sure why we couldn't just have Monty and the oline continue to serve as the engine of the O (especially if you add another solid lineman in the offseason), while Mitch plays Tannehill's role albeit a bit different.
It would be a lesser version of their O to be sure, as Mitch isn't the QB that Tannehill is, and Monty isn't the RB that Henry is, but I think they could really find sustained success with that style.
Sure but he's not as athletic so on PA he can't get on the edge like Mitch can.Tannehill is probably a better runner than Trubisky right now, all things considered. He scores a lot with his legs, one of the more underrated red zone weapons in the NFL today is Ryan Tannehill on the ground.
As a general note on the offense: I don't see why they can't play a TEN style, that's basically what they have going now.
Obviously Mitch doesn't have the kind of deep ball that Tannehill has (he's got beautiful touch), but Trubisky is more mobile and is more of a threat getting on the edge and running (he had 8 rushes yesterday).
I'm not sure why we couldn't just have Monty and the oline continue to serve as the engine of the O (especially if you add another solid lineman in the offseason), while Mitch plays Tannehill's role albeit a bit different.
Can we see less Eddie Jackson?
Where?I posted all of the vikings runs from Cook if you want to make yourself throw up in your mouth. His play is atrocious.
Amazing what happens when you have a competent person calling plays for your offense.Cole Kmet was on the field for 100% of the offensive snaps!
Lazor has done a great job and deserves a ton of credit. i also believe it wouldn’t have meant jack shit had the HC not been able to keep the team together and playing hard. why can’t both be true?Amazing what happens when you have a competent person calling plays for your offense.
I saw a lot of those live and it was pathetic. His effort on that first long pass to Conklin was god awful. He is 100% all talk and never backs it up.I posted all of the vikings runs from Cook if you want to make yourself throw up in your mouth. His play is atrocious.