Best player available strategy

zabavka

The owls are not what they seem...
Joined:
Nov 4, 2012
Posts:
1,680
Liked Posts:
1,732
I love all you message board heros here thinking the Bears have the luxury of going BPA

That is for successful organizations. They have the LUXURY of doing that cause they have this thing called depth.

The Bears have no depth and a ton of holes on the roster.

Shitty teams like us have to draft for need. Period.

With that said what are our greatest needs in order.

I'm going :
Qb
Ot
S
Te
Wr
Cb
Edge
DL
 

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
20,770
Liked Posts:
7,190
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
I love all you message board heros here thinking the Bears have the luxury of going BPA

That is for successful organizations. They have the LUXURY of doing that cause they have this thing called depth.

The Bears have no depth and a ton of holes on the roster.

Shitty teams like us have to draft for need. Period.

With that said what are our greatest needs in order.

I'm going :
Qb
Ot
S
Te
Wr
Cb
Edge
DL

you won't have depth until you stop the cycle of drafting for need and reaching for the endless QB you can't develop. Its a chicken and egg paradox, and one you must start to be a chicken, if you are ever going to lay an egg.

you gotta be a chicken man...you can't be no egg.
 

hebs

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 1, 2013
Posts:
3,893
Liked Posts:
2,636
Sounds good! I'll get Pace on the phone now and let him know.

Anything else?

Hold on... now he's asking what we should do in Free Agency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: WCL

bearmick

Captain Objectivity
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
36,901
Liked Posts:
41,287
you won't have depth until you stop the cycle of drafting for need and reaching for the endless QB you can't develop.

Reading this board, anyone would think the Bears are a team who have struck out on first round QB busts a half dozen times in the last decade.

Reality is they haven't made a serious effort to draft a franchise QB in 14 years. They are not an overly hasty team when it comes to QB. They are the most extreme of the polar opposite.
 

zabavka

The owls are not what they seem...
Joined:
Nov 4, 2012
Posts:
1,680
Liked Posts:
1,732
you won't have depth until you stop the cycle of drafting for need and reaching for the endless QB you can't develop. Its a chicken and egg paradox, and one you must start to be a chicken, if you are ever going to lay an egg.

you gotta be a chicken man...you can't be no egg.

So what pick is a chicken genius?

The mock draft in your sig?

Does that follow BPA or needs? Looks like needs to me
 

Bearly

Dissed membered
Donator
Joined:
Aug 17, 2011
Posts:
33,363
Liked Posts:
16,710
Location:
Palatine, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If you need good players.
 

bears5150

Active member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
837
Liked Posts:
222
Location:
Colorado
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Its because of people like this that the Bears organization is in soo much trouble. You draft BPA when your team can upgrade at any position. What and how many positions on the Bears can we not get better at. That's right 0. So if you have the third pick you take a player that grades out as the third pick. Not take a player that grades out between 15-20.
 

WindyCity

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Dec 12, 2011
Posts:
30,825
Liked Posts:
35,718
What he says is true, of the QB position.

The Bears have bent themselves over in regards to the QB position. They have left themselves in a must win situation in a draft with QBs that need time to develop.
 

modo

Based
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
25,776
Liked Posts:
20,677
Location:
USA
The draft will be affected by free agency. The still is a potential for bpa at the QB position.
 

Omeletpants

I have an Audi A8 and you don't
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
27,234
Liked Posts:
-1,527
My favorite teams
  1. Colorado Rockies
  1. Atlanta United FC
  1. Los Angeles Lakers
  2. Orlando Magic
  3. Phoenix Suns
  4. Sacramento Kings
  1. Columbus Blue Jackets
65197121.jpg
 

Chicago Staleys

Realist
Joined:
Sep 24, 2012
Posts:
10,357
Liked Posts:
6,646
I love all you message board heros here thinking the Bears have the luxury of going BPA

That is for successful organizations. They have the LUXURY of doing that cause they have this thing called depth.

The Bears have no depth and a ton of holes on the roster.

Shitty teams like us have to draft for need. Period.

With that said what are our greatest needs in order.

I'm going :
Qb
Ot
S
Te
Wr
Cb
Edge
DL

You put OT ahead of S, CB, and TE?!?

WTF
 

Tjodalv

Discoverer of Dragosaurs
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
15,272
Liked Posts:
13,654
OP has a 1:1 condescending name calling to post ratio in this thread. Where does that put him value wise on our long-standing agreement with the Lions board? Half a ham sandwich (no cheese)? Two pickle spears and a slice of rye? Would either of those fill a need?
 

rawdawg

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
6,703
Liked Posts:
4,480
Draft a qb for the future, protect him.

Something most meatballs don't understand

The OL was pretty solid last year. Not great, but they could bring back the same starting 5 and be a top 15 OL again. Their CBs and safeties are in the bottom 5 in the league at both positions. Without Jeffery, WR corps is also among the worst in the league.
 

zabavka

The owls are not what they seem...
Joined:
Nov 4, 2012
Posts:
1,680
Liked Posts:
1,732
The OL was pretty solid last year. Not great, but they could bring back the same starting 5 and be a top 15 OL again. Their CBs and safeties are in the bottom 5 in the league at both positions. Without Jeffery, WR corps is also among the worst in the league.

Cb and S can be shored up via free agency easier than OT

While our starters are ok there is zero depth behind them should an injury occur
 

zabavka

The owls are not what they seem...
Joined:
Nov 4, 2012
Posts:
1,680
Liked Posts:
1,732
So you just changed from "greatest needs in order" to "greatest needs that can't be filled easiest in free agency"? Good talk.

I didn't see you provide your list pal
 

wazzupi

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 9, 2016
Posts:
3,995
Liked Posts:
1,344
Cb and S can be shored up via free agency easier than OT

While our starters are ok there is zero depth behind them should an injury occur

Yep in the worst draft to look for OTs youre so right bears pick up beachum and they are set.
Ill list my order
Qb
Edge(injury concerns and depth)
CB
DL
WR
TE
S
OT
ILB
OG
C
 

botfly10

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 19, 2011
Posts:
32,002
Liked Posts:
25,238
you won't have depth until you stop the cycle of drafting for need and reaching for the endless QB you can't develop. Its a chicken and egg paradox, and one you must start to be a chicken, if you are ever going to lay an egg.

you gotta be a chicken man...you can't be no egg.

Endless reaching for QBs? wtf are you talking about?
 

Top