jts1207
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,412
- Liked Posts:
- 1,692
Trade time!
I believe that's why they signed Ross. That gives them cover to retool. Hiring Girardi would have been a win now mode.If you trade Bryant, might as well blow this thing up.
Pretty sure Theo is gonna give him one more shot at an extension. With his injury history lately and not technically being in a free agent year, its worth a shot.
I thought more of not finishing the Javy extension or giving Tony one was hoping Bryant will still accept the deal. Nothing about trading him for more now that the other team needs to give up more for 2 years, he is still going to cost them 24 next year.
But then again, if Theo chooses he wants to start building again, maybe they are all gone.
I already think 25 is his last arby number regardless of what he does this year, which is why this whole grievance was a moot point. I am pretty sure Harper is going to feel underpaid his last 3 years and if he is worried about Rizzo declining then he needs to add an opt out.Ya when Boras says sure. 300 mil. How do you think that will go over?
I believe that he is 25 AAV age wise at the deal makes it a 8 year offer. 200 mil is a fair market value. But with Boras he will over shoot that to 30 AAV and try to get 10 years out of a chump team owner.
Bryant is a nice kid. But he lacks the Chramatic appeal that a player like Baez brings. That is why you invest into Baez. He is already the face of the team and has become a icon in baseball.
End of the day it is more about marketing vs numbers. Baez gives the Cubs head lines. Bryant is more of a behind the scenes guy with a pending over payment.
Not sure I agree with this. If you're saying blow it up for 2020 then yeah probably. But there's a difference between blowing it up and going multiple year rebuild and blowing it up for 1-2 years cutting dead weight salary as you can. In particular, it's interesting that reports have come out about Arenado loving the idea of playing for the cubs. Admittedly it's a tough needle to thread but there's a scenario where the cubs get a haul for Bryant in prospects and pay less back to get Arenado because at this point Arenado is in a Stanton situation. He can dictate where he goes and they already have frayed the relationship with him.If you trade Bryant, might as well blow this thing up.
I already think 25 is his last arby number regardless of what he does this year, which is why this whole grievance was a moot point. I am pretty sure Harper is going to feel underpaid his last 3 years and if he is worried about Rizzo declining then he needs to add an opt out.
The other thing, you get KB extended, where his number stays at 18 this year, 25 next year, you can probably start Nico day 1 stating the slate of games he got in september. I dont know who's call nico at center the last game was, did not seem like Joe paid much attention to what anyone else wanted at that point, but that was after he said he did not want to come back.
If KB has a deal, no reason not to start Nico, if he does not, then no way Nico starts the season here unless there is no chance, and if its no chance, he is probably gone.
Not sure I agree with this. If you're saying blow it up for 2020 then yeah probably. But there's a difference between blowing it up and going multiple year rebuild and blowing it up for 1-2 years cutting dead weight salary as you can. In particular, it's interesting that reports have come out about Arenado loving the idea of playing for the cubs. Admittedly it's a tough needle to thread but there's a scenario where the cubs get a haul for Bryant in prospects and pay less back to get Arenado because at this point Arenado is in a Stanton situation. He can dictate where he goes and they already have frayed the relationship with him.
Biggest issue there is the grievance is so late in the offseason that pulling all the pieces together is going to be tough. But I think you could semi-realistically get like several big moves done and go into 2020 with holes. Just as an example here, let's say they do trade bryant for idk like Waters and pitching from the braves and then subsequently package heyward with other bits to Colorado for Arenado. You might very well go into 2020 with a giant hole in the outfield both at CF and RF just because they don't have the parts left anymore to sign. However, Waters will likely be ready by midseason if you're lucky and almost certainly 2021 if you're not and you will have moved around the parts to be closer to say the 2015 cubs than the 2016 cubs where if shit falls right you add guys at the deadline.
Grevance was a moot point....
Real talk. This is about age. Bryant would be a year younger when he hit FA.
He turns 30 1/4/2022.
So 29 vs 30. That is a big deal when teams negotiate.
So the motivation was greed.
IMO this is what it has been about. The Cubs had to deal with 2 injuries which left 3B open. That is it. Bryant ran with it. If he struggled he would have been demoted. That has been the status que.
So this is about a dick head agent looking for another pay day. Nothing more or less.
Locker room cancerPUIG for right field!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is available, reasonable and licks bats in the locker room.
If Heyward goes away I could deal with Puig. Hell, we had our Puig in Soler, second chance.
PUIG for right field!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is available, reasonable and licks bats in the locker room.
If Heyward goes away I could deal with Puig. Hell, we had our Puig in Soler, second chance.